Mar 022023
 


As the world drowns in a sea of mounting evidence demonstrating the destructive harm wrought by the so-called Covid19 “vaccines,” officialdom remains engaged in an act of willful blindness so extreme that it can only be seen to be part of globalism’s agenda to “depopulate” the planet.

Our guest Dr. Jessica Rose is a Canadian researcher whose expertise in immunology and computational biology served as the grounds for her decision to raise the alarm about COVID-19 “vaccines.” Having reviewed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database in conjunction with other sources of information, she arrived at the conclusion “that VAERS is flawed and antiquated.”

The under-reported adverse event factor has been estimated by different studies to be between 20 to 41 times higher than what is being officially reported. No matter which of the estimates are most accurate, even without the under-reported numbers the “vaccines” have been directly associated with millions of deaths globally.

The continuing promotion of the deadly injections in the wake of indisputable evidence of their toxicity has led Dr Rose to conclude that the whole pandemic narrative is a political one, not about viruses or health care. Consequently she is now considering entering the field of politics, “not something I would ever want to engage in” given the nature of those currently in office. But since this is the source of the real pandemic – the political one – it must also be seen to be the solution to end the pandemic.

Dr Rose has already expressed a number of political observations that transcend the official narratives. Joe Biden, she notes, is not competent to serve as America’s president, while Trump was a godsend to America in comparison. Meanwhile, Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is not only “unlikable and not relatable” but also “just gross!” And in recognizing that today’s presidents and prime ministers are globalist puppets, Dr Rose is already off to a solid start on the political front.

In advising others to “run for politics, she has identified the most effective means of ending the pandemic in a way that is Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

798 – Some inconvenient truths—about freedom

 Comments Off on 798 – Some inconvenient truths—about freedom
Feb 162023
 


For most people in the Western world, “freedom” has been taken as a given. Their ability to do so depended upon a fundamental moral principle held in common, one that Professor of Moral Philosophy John Macmurray (1891-1976) described as the “law of freedom.”

“No man can compass his own freedom for himself,” warned Macmurray in his 1949 book Conditions of Freedom. “He must accept it as a free gift from others; and if they will not give it to him he cannot have it. This is the law of freedom.”

The palpable loss of freedom now experienced on a global scale makes visible an inconvenient truth about freedom that few wish to address, but upon which Macmurray conveniently elaborated:

“We flatter ourselves too much when we imagine that we love freedom and strive wholeheartedly towards freedom. On the contrary; there are few things that we fear so much. No doubt we find the ‘idea’ of freedom most attractive; but the reality is another matter. For to act freely is to take a decision and accept the consequences.

“I see history, in its concrete reality, not as Man’s struggle to win his freedom in a world that frustrates his efforts; but as a record of the twists and evasions by which men seek to escape from freedom in a world which thrusts it remorselessly upon them. The determination which oppresses us is not the opposite of freedom; for what is determined is that Man shall be free.”

In other words, the inconvenient truth about freedom is that most people don’t want it. This leaves those who do want freedom obligated to take the initiative by getting involved in politics, both on principle and as guardians committed to the eternal vigilance required in a free society.

In light of the understanding that freedom must be given freely by each individual to other individuals, it turns out that the phrase “Give me liberty or give me death,” apparently describes the nature of freedom in a way that’s Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Feb 152023
 

Dr. Jessica Rose is a Canadian researcher using her expertise in immunology and computational biology to raise the alarm about COVID-19 “vaccines.”

The decision by the Centers For Disease Control (CDC) recommending that COVID-19 “vaccines” be included in the typical regimen of vaccines given to children as young as six months old has her alarmed. This decision, coupled with her research which has shown that as many as 13 million people worldwide may have died as a result of COVID-19 mRNA injections should horrify any parent.

“I don’t even know how to think about this seriously. A six-month-old baby’s immune system, neurological system, cardiovascular system, all of the systems are really in the development phase so we have no idea what the impact of doing this is. Do not put this crap into your babies. Don’t do it.”

(This video banned by YouTube but can be found on our Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee channels.)

Your support is always appreciated and is what makes our programming possible.
🧡 PayPal

787 – The dictatorship of the primitive | Salim Mansur

 Comments Off on 787 – The dictatorship of the primitive | Salim Mansur
Dec 012022
 


In an effort to describe and explain the madness forcing various versions of a “green agenda” upon us, our guest Salim Mansur recently found himself drawn to a series of essays originally compiled in Ayn Rand’s 1971 book “The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution.” (re-released in 1999 as “Return of the Primitive” with additional essays by Peter Schwartz on the enduring legacy of the Left.)

“There is something fundamentally primitive in this malady, this profound sickness that has overtaken Western man,” laments Salim. “It was astounding. Everything that Rand wrote about is what we’re living through. This is not a new debate.”

Drawing upon Rand’s symbolic comparison of the Greek gods Apollo and Dionysus with the Right and Left respectively, Salim is led unavoidably to the conclusion that the making of civilizations is an individual undertaking, not a collective one.

In the light of that reality, the collectivist wave now enveloping the West can itself be understood to be both the cause and symptom of civilization’s collapse. Continue reading »

Aug 252022
 


Apparently, the Left was never adequately immunized against Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), the political virus that infected Democrats, globalists, the deep state, and the fake news media the first time Trump rose to power. Now the latest variant has emerged, a clear sign that Trump must once again be on the rise.

For example, Carleton University professor and journalist Andrew Cohen in an August 19 editorial “Right follows script after Mar-a-Lago search” wrote “The right exploded. They screamed, they seethed, they snarled. The words were not just shrill, they were terrifying. At times, they encouraged violence. These are the new Republican rules of order in public debate. Rush to judgment. Ignore facts. Enter shooting. Empty your arsenal. Deny. Attack. Restraint is no virtue. Insanity is no vice.”

And then there was American philosopher, author, and podcast host Sam Harris, whose TDS infection has exposed a moral vacuum devoid of any principle or values whatever.

While openly citing evidence demonstrating Biden’s corruption (but offering none regarding Trump), Harris argued “Whatever the scope of Joe Biden’s corruption is… it is infinitesimal compared to the corruption we know Trump is involved in.” This, after proudly proclaiming that he “would not have cared” if Hunter Biden had “the corpses of children in his basement.” Continue reading »

771 – It’s biblical—God, politics, and morality

 Comments Off on 771 – It’s biblical—God, politics, and morality
Aug 112022
 


It has long been argued that totalitarian nations and tyrannies are a consequence of the “atheistic” philosophies under which they are ruled. However, this is a serious error. It is based on the mistaken view that “atheism” is some kind of philosophy or doctrine, as is the case with theism. But this is not so.

Consider that, unlike the word “theist” which in a proper context identifies what a person is, “atheist” is a negative concept that defines a person in terms of what he is not. In no way can it be reasonably justified on these grounds to conclude that atheists have some kind of “atheist belief system” or philosophy.

In fact, in philosophical and moral terms “atheism” isn’t even a thing. However, tyranny is. That tyrannies may be “atheistic” is mere association; it is not cause and effect. Totalitarian regimes and tyrannies are caused by collectivist ideologies invariably supported by Leftist theists and atheists alike. Similarly, theists and atheists on the Right support freedom and justice.

In the moral and political gulf between freedom and tyranny, the only polarity that matters is the one that contrasts the values of the Left (collectivism) with those of the Right (individualism).

Thus it is unfortunate that some on the “religious right” have been increasingly disparaging atheists, as if atheism is somehow a causal factor behind the current tyranny. In atheism, theists perceive an absence of morality rather than recognizing the presence of alternative moralities grounded on different principles.

On the one hand are those who cannot conceive of morality without faith in a God and afterlife, while on the other there are those who cannot conceive of morality based on anything but reason exercised within a finite limited lifetime.

Fortunately, experience has demonstrated that these metaphysically opposing views do not preclude a shared morality. Whether theist or atheist, what counts in politics is which side of political polarity holds power – Left or Right. Consequently, those on the side of freedom will of necessity eventually gravitate towards those moral alliances held together in an orbit circling the political polarity that is Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

758 – Man of the people | Maxime Bernier

 Comments Off on 758 – Man of the people | Maxime Bernier
May 122022
 


“We need an ideological revolution,” recommends our guest Maxime Bernier, leader of the People’s Party of Canada (PPC).

As a former member of the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) who narrowly (and suspiciously) lost a CPC leadership bid, Bernier served as Minister of Foreign Affairs and as chairman of the Committee on National Defense. So when he says that the CPC is “intellectually and morally bankrupt,” his observation is based on direct experience.

“It’s not our war,” says Bernier about the situation in Ukraine. Calling for diplomatic negotiation instead of military escalation, he has found that this view has become an unacceptable discussion point in Canada, where the Trudeau government is forcing Canadian taxpayers to fund the very escalation he fears.

Sadly, reaching Canadians with news about the PPC or its take on the issues has become an uphill struggle. In a country whose fourth estate has been transformed into a taxpayer-funded propaganda machine, the odds of any objective reporting about the PPC or its leader from this media are remote indeed.

Because he has wisely refused to take state-mandated injections, Bernier has been prohibited from travelling freely within his own country. Consequently, Bernier has joined with former Newfoundland premier Brian Peckford (one of the original framers of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms) to file a lawsuit against the Trudeau government’s violation of everyone’s constitutional right to travel in Canada.

No one, let alone a leader of a national party, should ever be subject to travel restrictions or injection mandates. In the face of the Left’s contempt for individual freedom, Bernier’s style of “doing politics differently” becomes a necessity. Of course, everyone already knows that being Just Right is about as different from how politics is done today as it gets.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal