{"id":9158,"date":"2018-09-27T05:00:58","date_gmt":"2018-09-27T09:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.justrightmedia.org\/blog\/?p=9158"},"modified":"2018-11-11T14:15:45","modified_gmt":"2018-11-11T19:15:45","slug":"575-our-godless-morality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/archives\/9158","title":{"rendered":"575 &#8211; Our godless morality"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/575-contemplation-168x100.jpg\" alt=\"Contemplation\" width=\"168\" height=\"100\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-9152\" \/><audio controls preload=\"none\"><source src=\"\/\/www.justrightmedia.org\/BROADCASTS\/20180927-justRIGHT-575-godlessMORALITY.mp3\" type=\"audio\/mpeg\"><\/audio><\/p>\n<p>As faith-based religion continues to lose its monopoly on morality, the source and nature of mankind\u2019s morality is finally being openly questioned and discussed. In fact, that discussion has been drawing unprecedented audiences to both social media and to live venues, where the likes of <strong>Jordan Peterson<\/strong> and <strong>Sam Harris<\/strong> have essentially established the popular \u2013 and incorrect &#8211; framework of this public debate.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not surprising in the least that <strong>these debates have never produced a resolution<\/strong>; one cannot resolve a philosophical dilemma without confining oneself to the discipline of philosophy itself.  <strong>In attempting to resolve issues of \u2018free will\u2019, determinism, choice, and morality, neither \u2018faith\u2019 nor \u2018pragmatism\u2019 offer any solutions.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Morality has but one source and one standard: the preservation of human life itself.  That is the \u2018good.\u2019  The destruction of human life is the \u2018evil.\u2019  Morality has no other application or purpose.  <strong>Like any discipline, the development of an objective moral code is fundamentally a science, and as such, must be based on evidence and reason, not on faith or intuition.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As the third branch in the hierarchy of philosophy (the first two being metaphysics and epistemology), the development of any moral code will necessarily be based on whatever conclusions have been drawn from the first two.  This is why the discussion about morality has largely become hijacked by a needless and meaningless debate over <strong>atheism versus religious faith<\/strong>.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Metaphysics and epistemology deal with two primary concepts that are \u2018axiomatic\u2019 \u2013 meaning that they are not subject to \u2018proof\u2019 \u2013 but must be accepted: <strong>existence<\/strong> and <strong>consciousness<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The idea of Existence, a concept of something that has no beginning and no end, represents a dilemma for many, since it would appear to defy the laws of <strong>causality<\/strong>.  After all, there is no \u2018first cause.\u2019 Who or what \u2018caused\u2019 existence itself?  This, of course, is not a valid question, and the failure to address this epistemological error has \u2018caused\u2019 untold suffering throughout history.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2018Cause\u2019 only properly applies to human action<\/strong> (hence the need for morality), not to metaphysical events where \u2018cause\u2019 becomes an infinite regress of infinite variables (entities and actions), always defined subjectively by the assumptions, needs, or purpose of an observer.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, consciousness, particularly of the self and one\u2019s own identity, is complicated by arguments concerning \u2018free will\u2019 and its apparent conflict with a deterministic universe.  Without free will, it is rightly argued, man cannot be a moral agent.<\/p>\n<p>Yet <strong>free will is acknowledged as a given because it can be observed in practice<\/strong>.  Were it not so, then no one could be held responsible (being the \u2018cause\u2019) for one\u2019s actions, whether resulting in good or evil.  In other words, morality would not be possible.  Nor would justice.  Nor would individual freedom and a free society.<\/p>\n<p>In the attempt to reconcile free will and freedom of choice with a deterministic universe, many resort to a \u2018leap of faith\u2019 suggesting that free will is somehow \u2018divinely endowed\u2019 upon mankind since free will allows man to escape from the determinism of his universe.  Though desired and valued, free will is seen as something \u2018unnatural\u2019 since it appears to reside outside the confines imposed by the deterministic laws of nature.<\/p>\n<p>But this view again arises from an <strong>epistemological error<\/strong>, one that assumes a conflict between the deterministic nature of the universe, and the wonder and beauty of the freedom that is the consequence of possessing free will.<\/p>\n<p>In the proper context, it must be understood that what is meant by \u2018determined\u2019 in a philosophical context are the \u2018laws\u2019 of the universe itself, and in particular, the past; history cannot be changed or altered, and each individual is born into an environment \u2018determined\u2019 by its immediate past.<\/p>\n<p>Free will can only be exercised in the present \u2013 the only possible point of action \u2013 and <strong>actions freely chosen are \u2018determined\u2019 by the free agent\u2019s purpose and code of morality.<\/strong>  Those same actions have consequences that will either enhance life or diminish it.<\/p>\n<p>The undetermined is the future, and it is in navigating that undetermined future that we require morality to guide us. In the act of choosing between actions that we know are good and those that we know are evil, the existence of free will is both revealed and confirmed. <\/p>\n<p><strong>There is no conflict between determinism and free will<\/strong>.  As demonstrated on today\u2019s broadcast, the great irony is that what has been determined is that human beings have free will. <\/p>\n<p>Nor could it be otherwise.  It\u2019s the inescapable conclusion when the issue is resolved in a philosophical way that\u2019s Just Right.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/\/www.justrightmedia.org\/blog\/575-topics\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/\/www.justrightmedia.org\/images\/buttons\/topics.gif\" \/><\/a> <a href=\"\/\/www.justrightmedia.org\/blog\/575-clips-credits\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/\/www.justrightmedia.org\/images\/buttons\/clips_and_credits.gif\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As faith-based religion continues to lose its monopoly on morality, the source and nature of mankind\u2019s morality is finally being openly questioned and discussed. In fact, that discussion has been drawing unprecedented audiences to both social media and to live venues, where the likes of Jordan Peterson and Sam Harris have essentially established the popular <a href='https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/archives\/9158' class='excerpt-more'>[Continue Reading]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":9153,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,5,596,28,3,43,599],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-audio","category-ethics","category-ideas","category-latest","category-reality","category-science","category-science-tech","issues-ethics","issues-god","issues-morality","issues-reality","issues-religion-2","issues-science-2","issues-values","personalities-carl-jung","personalities-jordan-peterson","personalities-sam-harris","category-12-id","category-5-id","category-596-id","category-28-id","category-3-id","category-43-id","category-599-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9158"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9158\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9161,"href":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9158\/revisions\/9161"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9153"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justrightmedia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}