Episode 984: U.N.CONSCIONABLE—the post-national agenda
Air Date: September 30, 2026 | Host: Bob Metz
Just Right — broadcasting on WBCQ and Channel 292 shortwave
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this program are those of the participants.
Clip (A Stranger in Town, 1943):
Your Honor. Mayor Connison, it's only right that you should know why I, as stranger, have become involved in your affairs. Believe me, it's not because I am a justice of the Supreme Court. It's because, like all of you here, I am a citizen of this country. That is no little honor. Men have fought revolutions, have died to be called citizen. And as citizens, we carry a burning responsibility. It means that when we elect men to public office, we cannot do it as lightly as we flip a coin. It means that after we've elected them, we can't sit back and say our job is done. What they do now doesn't concern us.
That philosophy of indifference is what the enemies of decent government want. If we allow them to have their way to grow strong and vicious, then the heroic struggle which welded thousands of lovely towns like this into a great nation means nothing. Then we are not citizens, we're traitors.
The great liberties by which we live have been bought with blood. The kind of government we get is the kind of government we want. Government of the people by the people and for the people can mean any kind of government. It's our duty to make it mean only one kind: uncorrupted, free, united.
I believe, Mayor Connison, that I've answered your question.
Bob Metz:
Welcome everyone. It is Wednesday, September 30th, 2026. I'm Bob Metz, and this is Just Right, broadcasting around the world and online. Join us for an hour of discussion that's not right wing. It's just right.
The November 3rd American midterm elections are just around the corner, while the 2026 United Nations General Assembly, which runs from mid-September to the end of the year, continues in session. And you know, for an organization with the word nations in its name, the United Nations is possibly the most anti-national organization on the political face of the planet. In his own speech before the General Assembly, U.S. President Donald Trump certainly didn't hold back on his criticism of the UN, while other voices, like Argentina's Javier Milei, did the same. Yea, at long last, more and more members of the UN are speaking out against the UN globalist agenda and doing so right to their faces. And I say it long last, because the reality of what the UN has been doing to destroy nationhood and to advance global communism is nothing new.
It was identified decades ago, including on this very show. Back then, the term post-national country had yet to be popularized, a contradictory anti-concept repeated by Canada's Liberal Party under both Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney, while hypocritically, they hide behind the very sovereignty of Canada they denied so that they can condemn a real sovereign nation, namely the United States of America.
Fortunately, the voices you'll be hearing today have spoken out to praise nations, not to condemn them, and as far as I'm concerned, this is a very welcome breath of fresh political air, which we can all start breathing in right after our encouraging you to write us at feedback@justrightmedia.org". Hear us on WBCQ and on Channel 292 Shortwave. Follow and like us on your favorite podcast platform, and visit us at justrightmedia.org where you can access all of our social media links, archived broadcasts, and the support button that makes it easy for you to support the show. Because as always, your financial support is appreciated and is what makes this show possible.
To set the tone for today's discussion about the United Nations, allow me to begin by quoting, as we have before so many years ago on the show, the following passage from Ayn Rand's essay, The Anatomy of Compromise, written over half a century ago and significantly at a time when the Soviet Union was seen as the world's main communist threat, and I quote:
"Psychologically, the UN has contributed a great deal to the gray swamp of demoralization, of cynicism, bitterness, hopelessness, fear, and nameless guilt which is swallowing the Western world. But the communist world has gained a moral sanction, a stamp of civilized respectability from the Western world. It has gained the West's assistance in deceiving its victims.
It has gained the status and prestige of an equal partner, thus establishing the notion that the difference between human rights and mass slaughter is merely a difference of political opinion. The declared goal of the communist countries is the conquest of the world. What they stand to gain from a collaboration with the relatively free countries is the latter's material, financial, scientific, and intellectual resources.
The free countries have nothing to gain from the communist countries. Therefore, the only form of common policy or compromise possible between two such parties is the policy of property owners who make piecemeal concessions to an armed thug in exchange for his promise not to rob them.
The UN has delivered a larger part of the globe's surface and population into the power of Soviet Russia than Russia could ever hope to conquer by armed force. The treatment accorded to Katanga versus the treatment accorded to Hungary is a sufficient example of the UN policies.
An institution allegedly formed for the purpose of using the united might of the world to stop an aggressor has become a means of using the united might of the world to force the surrender of one helpless country after another into the aggressor's power. Who but a concrete bound epistemological savage could have expected any other result from such an experiment in collaboration, quote unquote. What would you expect from a crime fighting committee whose board of directors included the leading gangsters of the community."
End quote.
Well, what a perfect metaphor. A criminally organized crime fighting committee. And that's a phrase that sadly would describe a good portion of the world's socialist and communist countries and judiciaries and police.
Because they don't fight crime, they encourage and perpetuate it. So you can well imagine my surprise at hearing Argentina's Javier Milei pretty much say the very same thing during his opening address to the General Assembly, parts of which we'll be hearing on this side of our upcoming bumper. And on the return side, as if to illustrate the depths to which other speakers at the UN will stoop. Matt Walsh cites various third world hellhole leaders, as he calls them, blaming their dystopian uncivilized conditions on America, from whom they now demand something that they're calling restorative justice. Talk about a bunch of losers. But first, here's Javier Milei as heard through the voice of his female English translator.
Clip (U.N. General Assembly, September 23, 2026, Javier Milei via translator):
Mr. President, heads of state, representatives of the peoples of the world. Today I address you for the third time as president of all Argentines. When we took office of a country in ruins on the brink of the worst crisis in its history, one thing was clear to us from the outset. We had to confront our problems with absolute honesty. Lying to ourselves in order to feel better was going to get us nowhere.
It's always preferable to tell an uncomfortable truth than a comforting lie. So believe me when I say that I know what I'm talking about when, in a constructive spirit, I point to the problems facing this organization which purports to guide states and arbitrate between them. Seventy-eight years ago, this house declared that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights, noble words whose spirit I fully share. To that end, it undertook to uphold international law, defend the sovereignty of nations, and provide a forum in which conflicts could be resolved through cooperation, rather than immediately through the force of arms. That was the original purpose, the contract that we all signed. But today, regrettably, it is time to acknowledge that in practice that sacred covenant has been broken. That's to say it's become a useless organization whose only purpose is to sustain a caste of fatally arrogant parasites, masquerading as well-intentioned bureaucrats.
I would remind them of what Mises said. Good people do not think about controlling the lives of their fellow human beings. Those who were supposed to guarantee collective security and human rights failed in their task. Instead, they allowed chaos, violence, and international terrorism to flourish. The alleged defenders of human rights have sheltered bloodthirsty dictatorships and regimes that stone women in the streets. They have systematically voted against Israel while remaining silent in the face of Islamic terrorism and the genocide of Christians in Africa. And as if that were not enough, an organization established to defend the territorial sovereignty of its members decided to look the other way with regard to the situation of the Malvinas Island, South Georgia Islands and South Sandwich Islands and the surrounding maritime areas. There's no shortage of words or resolutions. What is lacking is consequences, because an institution that cannot ensure that its words carry weight in the real world loses the most important thing of all, its authority.
In these circumstances, those who follow the rules receive no reward for doing so, while those who break them suffer no repercussions whatsoever. That's why the Malvinas are not merely an issue between Argentina and the United Kingdom. They also raise a question regarding the ability of this organization to enforce its own resolutions. For far too long, Argentina managed its own decline. We grew accustomed to debating how to divide up what remained rather than asking ourselves how we could grow again, how we could rebuild what we had lost.
That's over. We are advancing in the development of our strategic resources. We've embraced the technological revolution, and we are rebuilding our military capabilities after decades of neglect. We've also made a geopolitical choice. We have unequivocally aligned ourselves with the West, with the United States and with Israel, countries with which we share a deep affinity of values and strategic complementarity. That is why we condemn the attacks by the Iranian regime against the state of Israel.
We have designated the Iranian revolutionary guard as a terrorist organization. We have decided to cooperate with the world, but to do so standing tall, in the understanding that only a nation that is politically relevant, economically influential and militarily respected can truly be a master of its own destiny. Just as I have shown you how the UN failed to do what it was supposed to do, now I want to tell you how it has excelled at what no one asked it to do and what it should never have been doing. Because alongside that failure, they have built a bureaucratic leviathan devoted to deciding how the peoples of the world and their citizens should live. This amounts to a curious mixture of anarchy and tyranny, impotence in the face of those who break the most basic rules such as bloodthirsty dictatorships and terrorist organizations, coupled with Orwellian control and impositions on liberal democracies that abide by the rules. We saw this with the Millennium Agenda, we saw it with the 2030 agenda, with economic regulation, gender agendas, environmental extremism and unchecked immigration. And every time they failed, rather than reviewing the model or apologizing, they doubled down as they are already doing with the 2045 agenda, which I say now will fail.
But perhaps the most serious example, the one that forever should shame this organization, is quite another, that is how they manage the pandemic. During the pandemic, bodies under the auspices of this house put themselves before scientific evidence and the sovereignty of nations and promoted forced lockdown policies throughout the world that ruined jobs, ruined the education of entire generation of children and cost the lives of millions of people who died alone without basic medical care. Where some allege a public health policy error, we see a global experiment in social control disguised as science. And when a state wearing public health blinkers deprives its population of the right to work, to receive an education, and to bid farewell to their dead, this results in millions of unavoidable deaths, there is a word for it, genocide.
That happens in many countries, including Argentina, which boasted of being the World Health Organization's star pupil, and that is why we decided to leave the World Health Organization. Added to that is something more subtle but equally damaging, the psychological terror instilled by the state. For years citizens around the world were told that they should be afraid. Afraid of their neighbors, of the air they breathed, of leaving their homes.
That fear wasn't a mere side effect, it was the chosen instrument of their government. The problem is that emergencies eventually pass. Fear passes, generations move on, but the institutions and powers created on the pretext of those alleged emergencies remain. And if for a moment we allow ourselves to believe that the lesson had been learned after so many failures, the arrival of artificial intelligence demonstrates quite something else. The printing press, the steam engine, electricity, the internet, every great technological revolution has been accompanied by fears about what it would destroy, particularly jobs. There is no doubt that this is one of the most effective ways of instilling fear in human beings, given the role of work as a means of subsistence. Where we many see a threat, we see a new frontier.
Artificial intelligence or superintelligence, as Donald Trump said, can double our productivity in a way that we do not yet comprehend. That calls for prudence, yes, but prudence doesn't mean fear. Moreover, under no circumstances should fear automatically translate into obedience. For centuries, fear over tomorrow has been used as an argument for restricting freedoms today, always with the same promise.
Give us a part of your freedom and we will protect you from this new threat. We will apply a different principle. In the face of uncertainty, we propose determination. In the face of fear, courage, in the face of decline, ambition, and in the face of resignation, we propose optimism.
That is why I tell you that when it comes to artificial intelligence, Argentina will stand at the forefront of freedom to ensure that it is consistent with our fundamental libertarian values, namely respect for life, liberty, private property, and the notion of human dignity. In that regard, we fully share President Trump's vision. But we mustn't confuse corporation with subordination.
We believe in alliances and above all in nations. Decline is not destiny. It is the result of repeated decisions.
And if a course can be chosen, it can also be changed. We want an Argentina that is prosperous, influential, and powerful. Not to subjugate others, but to be free. May the forces of heaven be with us and long live freedom, damn it.
Clip (Matt Walsh, September 24, 2026):
Matt Walsh: Let's take a look at this pathetic display from the UN. And most of these clips are from this week. One by one, the leaders of various third world hell holes, including Sierra Leone, Suriname, Ghana, took turns demanding reparations for slavery as part of a new resolution for racial equity or something.
Ghana Leader: For all must also embrace the unfinished cause of reparatory justice. In March. This assembly adopted a resolution led by Ghana and supported by the African Union in Caribbean community. Recognizing the trafficking and racialized charter enslavement of Africans as the gravest crime against humanity.
Suriname Leader: Mr. President, the pursuit of restorative justice gained new momentum with the adoption of the resolution on slavery and transatlantic trafficking of enslaved Africans in this hall in March of this year. This development is relevant for Suriname, and equally important for the countries of the Caribbean region. The discussion is no longer about whether slavery and colonialism have caused lasting consequences. Negative consequences.
We know we are living them. We increasingly must focus on how to overcome these effects. And on the question of what form reparation should be to achieve that.
Sierra Leone Leader: This resolution is a pathway to healing and reparative justice. This resolution is a safeguard against forgetting.
Matt Walsh: Now, what these people never talk about because it would destroy their narrative and prevent them from ever getting handouts again is the fact that almost everyone who ended up as a slave in the Americas was first enslaved by Africans. So who exactly would be getting these reparations? Are we supposed to enrich those people at the expense of white people, the descendants of the men who risked their lives to end the institution of slavery? Explain to us in plain English, if you can, exactly how that makes any sense whatsoever.
So, yes, they want reparations from the descendants of the people who ended the institution that their ancestors not just participated in, but pioneered.
Bob Metz:
Restorative justice is pure injustice. It penalizes and punishes those who have nothing to do with whatever alleged offense is being addressed. It's unconscionable, immoral, and nothing but another example of how self-created hell holes lobbied to access America's quote material, financial, scientific and intellectual resources, end quote, while pretending to be victims of some imagined crime. So much for losers begging to the winners.
So let me first shout out a loud bravo to Argentina's Javier Milei. Talk about giving the UN a well-deserved punch in its political nose. It was a knockout, and as if to repeat the observation of Ayn Rand, we quoted earlier. He said the UN has failed at what it's supposed to do and excelled at doing what it should never have been doing, sheltering bloodthirsty dictatorships. Impotence in the face of those who break the most basic rules, such as bloodthirsty dictatorships and terrorist organizations, coupled with Orwellian controls and impositions on liberal democracies that abide by the rules.
And after declaring that Argentina fully shares President Trump's vision, let's take this opportunity to get a glimpse of what Trump's vision is as chosen and presented by CanadaPoli's Mark Parilovos on his September 23rd podcast.
Clip (CanadaPoli, September 23, 2026):
Mark Parilovos: Trump goes to the heart of the United Nations and tells them how it is. No global government and no global taxes. And a lot of people are saying, I voted for this. This is exactly what I wanted. Go Trump Go. Lots of people are very happy with this speech. Other people are, you know, don't like Trump and whatever.
What are you going to do? Benny says this is the single greatest moment from Trump's speech at the United Nations. He just called out UNESCO for destroying the greatest cultures of Western civilization through mass immigration instead of protecting our heritage. There is no human right to illegal immigration, but there is a right to remain a sovereign nation.
And so replacing the native population of the greatest nations in the world with third world, third worlders is a crime against humanity. Yep. Is the world waking up to what people have been screaming about for the last decade?
Not quite decade, but there's a big problem. We don't run our own governments, we don't run our own countries. Something should be done. And then Trump comes down the escalator. And here we are. So here he is at the UN. Listen, it's entertaining.
President Donald Trump: Isn't it ironic that the United Nations has an entire institution, the UNESCO group of people and countries devoted to protecting cultural heritage, yet with their ceaseless promotion of mass migration, these globalists are actively destroying the greatest cultures and most extraordinary heritage in all of history. There is no human right to illegal immigration, but there is a right to remain a sovereign nation. And we want to remain a sovereign nation, and so should you.
Mark Parilovos: So should you, says Trump. And I don't think he's wrong. I really don't think he's wrong. But I want to show how what Trump's saying here, that the globalists are facilitating an image migration, an illegal migration, an invasion of the West, and standing by and allowing it to happen, and using that as a weapon against the West.
And I don't know that the UN is the right target necessarily, but I think it's probably one of the heads of the Hydra that I've been talking about. And so he's going in and saying what you've done is unconscionable, and we know. And so is there going to be a follow-up more than speeches? I think we're watching it. We're watching the exchanges, and we're being impacted by it too.
The diesel price is part of it. Here is Trump and Robin says, President Trump at the UN General Assembly. the Islamic regime slaughtered over 72,000 innocent Iranians in this year. And yet the Islamic regime was still welcome at this very assembly.
The UN is a disgrace to the world. And yeah, I think that that's I think that that's true. Here's Trump calling them out to their faces. And that's one of the things a lot of people like about Trump.
President Donald Trump: ...regimes slaughtered over 72,000 of its citizens this year. Recently, 10,000 were killed for protesting. Just imagine such a vile regime were ever empowered to carry out large-scale terror attacks from behind a nuclear shield.
Mark Parilovos: There you go. Here's Trump. This is a longer clip of Trump. He covers a lot of ground in three minutes.
President Donald Trump: ...also worked with many countries in this room to implement the most sweeping UN reforms in history. We cut the UN budget for the first time ever, slashing it by 15% in 2026 and eliminating more than 4,000 positions from the UN bureaucracy. The United Nations has great, great potential. I've said that for many years, but it must stop imposing the far-left agenda of globalist bureaucrats who nobody ever elected.
Last year, my administration was forced to intervene to stop an obscure UN body, the international maritime organization, from secretly establishing a first ever global carbon tax, very expensive tax, to raise international shipping costs by 10 to 20 percent and maybe more than that.
There is no global government, and while I'm president, there will be no global taxes. The United States is equally opposed to the out of control. Thank you. Thank you very much. The United States is equally opposed to the out of control institution known as the International Criminal Court. We will never allow U.S. service members or anyone else to be investigated or given show trials by an anti-American tribunal with no jurisdiction over us. They're an evil group of people. I call on all nations that are members of the ICC to officially resign from this rogue institution immediately.
It is equally unacceptable that with all the genuine atrocities in the world, the UN's top human rights officials spend their time criticizing the United States for protecting our children from transgender mutilation and transgender insanity and enforcing our immigration laws. What they do is unbelievable what they do. It's transgender mutilation of our children.
The craven hypocrites of human rights council have little to say about the persecution of Christians. I mean, Christians are being persecuted all over the world. It's not even believable. I never thought I'd say it. But it's been happening for a long time. So this is persecution of Christians or the crimes of the world's most repressive regimes, yet they want America to open up our borders to gangs and criminals from world's most dangerous places. They want the worst people to come in from the worst places on earth, and we don't do it anymore. We did do it, but we don't do that anymore.
Mark Parilovos: Nick says President Trump just started ripping on Cuba at the UN and the Cuba delegation got up and walked out. We will not allow a haven for foreign adversaries to threaten America on our own doorstep. Here we go.
President Donald Trump: Mexico is the epicenter of the cartel violence, unfortunately. It's unacceptable for the United States to share a 2,000 mile border with a territory controlled by enemy cartels. So Mexico must reclaim control of its soil from the enemies of humanity.
My administration is also seeking a fundamental change in the situation in Cuba, where the communist regime is under great pressure, the biggest pressure they've ever been under. It's an absolutely failed state. It's failing like never before, and it will fall. Marco Rubio is handling a negotiation. He's deep into negotiations with Cuba. Let's see what happens. We'll not allow a haven for foreign adversaries to threaten America on our own doorstep. Right at our doorstep.
The Cuban regime has also spent decades coordinating with the left-wing radicals and communist networks here in the United States. As our State Department has detailed, they've cultivated ties to subversive and radical groups such as the Communist Party USA, Antifa, and the Democrat Socialists of America.
Communism will never be coming to America, but freedom will be coming to Cuba, and safety and security will be coming to Mexico.
Mark Parilovos: So there you go. This is him saying, listen, like I'm going to confront these problems. That's the only way forward.
President Donald Trump: Many great leaders. I know all of you very well. But they know that given only a short time to make this world better, safer, and more prosperous for our children, for the people on earth, we have to take advantage of it. As president of the most extraordinary nation in history, I have no interest in leaving dangers to grow for another day. I do not believe in letting problems fester. They only become harder to solve.
So while others have talked, I have acted. While others have spoken of peace, I have made peace. While others have ignored threats, I have confronted them. While others have talked of courage, America has shown it. While others have promised strength, I have used it to make America the most powerful country in the world.
Mark Parilovos: So I think that policy, that way of viewing things is something that makes Trump stand apart from a lot of other people. They will most people don't like conflict. Most people don't want to go into the conflicts. If forced to go into the conflict, they'll often surrender is not the right word. Maybe try and get out of the conflict, but they won't try and solve the conflict. Not often, and not the first time. So it's interesting. It's interesting to watch people knocked off balance by Trump's style of hey, like this appears to be a problem, let's sort it out. Interesting.
The Patriot Oasis says LMAO, Japan's Prime Minister just booted the fake news out of the room with Trump sitting right there. Trump, you said Trump says, you heard her. Same week CNN swore they wouldn't cover him, then they crawled back to the UN rope line. Now an allied PM is doing the same thing he did, no platform for the garbage product. Special relationship includes a spine. She has one.
This is at the United Nations, Trump's holding meetings and things like that there.
Unknown Speaker: So on this occasion, I would like to cover a lot of agenda items. So why not we ask the press corps to leave the room?
Mark Parilovos: There you heard of the go. There you go. So that's it. No press. No press at all. Here is Trump again. Bridget says President Trump just dropped the biggest truth bomb regarding child trafficking. Again, we've only covered a few minutes of the speech, and it's a very impactful speech covering a lot of ground.
President Donald Trump: The previous administration also lost nearly 300,000 children. Think of that. They lost more than 300,000 children, little children, who were trafficked into the United States on the Biden watch, many of whom have been raped, exploited, and abused, and sold. Sold. Nobody talks about that. The fake news doesn't write about it.
With many others, young children who are missing or dead. And we found a lot of these children and were sending it back, and we've been sending it back to their parents. They said, nobody knows who they are. They said, Where do you come from? And they'll give us a country and we'll find out and we'll figure it out and we'll bring them back to their homes. And the mother and father rush to the door and their tears and their eyes. They can't believe that they're seeing their son or daughter, their little son or daughter again. We've done almost 30,000 of them so far.
Any system that results in the mass trafficking of children is inherently evil. Yet that is exactly what the globalist migration agenda has done, and it's what it's all about. In America, those days, as you know, are over. The Trump administration is working, and we are continuing to work to track down the villains that are causing this problem. And also, as I said, to get back the 30,000. We've already returned. Now we think we're gonna have another. We're gonna find a lot. You're not gonna find all of them. 300, more than 300,000. They're lost or they're dead. They're lost or they're dead.
Mark Parilovos: There you go. So they're returning some people, but not all.
Bob Metz:
You're listening to Just Right, broadcasting around the world and online.
And you know, you have to appreciate how far we've come when the President of the United States would have to declare in front of the United Nations that any system that results in the mass trafficking of children is inherently evil. A president who points to left-wing radicals and communist networks such as the Communist Party USA, Antifa, and the Democrat Socialist of America.
You know, that kind of reminded me of the Communist Party of Canada, whose leader, William Kashtan, I debated on an open line live radio talk show, the Wayne McLean show, back in the 1980s, and which is still available somewhere online. What I didn't know at the time was that Kashtan was an active member of the Soviet Union's then KGB, something I learned from terrorist expert John Thompson, who was a five-time guest on our show after documents from the collapse of the Soviet Union were released.
Now I enjoyed it when Trump called for no global government, no carbon taxes, no mass migration, for the UN to stop imposing a far left agenda for no more international criminal court. But I had mixed feelings when I heard Trump suggest that the UN has great potential. Because given the makeup and behaviors of its members, there don't seem to be too many avenues for great potential. What an embarrassing and childish reaction we saw when half the assembly walked out when Benjamin Netanyahu took the stage. Clearly, they don't see the UN as a forum for them to objectively dispute anything that Netanyahu might say. They run away like the guilty criminals that they know they are.
And with that, here's yet another observation about the UN, as expressed by Ayn Rand over half a century ago. Quote:
"When an institution reaches the degree of corruption, brazen cynicism and dishonor demonstrated by the UN and its shameful history, to discuss it at any length is to imply that its members and supporters may be making an innocent error about its nature, which is no longer possible.
There is no margin for error about a monstrosity that was created for the alleged purpose of preventing wars by uniting the world against any aggressor that proceeded to unite it against any victim of aggression.
The expulsion of a charter member, the Republic of China, an action forbidden by the UN's own charter, was a moment of truth, a naked display of the United Nations soul. What was Red China's qualification for membership in the UN? The fact that her government seized power by force and has maintained it for 22 years by terror. What disqualified nationalist China? The fact that she was a friend of the United States."
End quote.
Think about it. Once called nationalist China, Taiwan's status as a nationalist nation is no longer seen in this light, and thus became post-national on the world's political stage. Or in other words, the post-nationalist agenda has been around for a long time.
Now, lest you think that political leaders like Trump, Milei, Rupert Lowe, and Netanyahu are alone and expressing their mutual ideals, you might want to check out another political leader about whom I knew next to nothing until I heard Dave Rubin interview him on his September 10 podcast, Poland's Dominik Tarczyński. At first I thought he was wearing a MAGA hat, but upon closer inspection, it was a Be Like Poland hat. And then, upon even closer inspection, it turned out that each hat basically stands for the same ideals and principles.
What he has to say here as an active member of the European Parliament makes the other leaders seem like moderate by comparison.
Clip (The Rubin Report, September 10, 2026):
Dave Rubin: I'm Dave Rubin. This is The Rubin Report. And joining me in studio today is a former two-time member of Polish Parliament, now two-time member of European Parliament, and two-time returning guest to the Rubin Report. Dominik Tarczyński.
Dominik Tarczyński: Pleasure to be here. Thank you for having me. And this is just the beginning. I'm just starting.
Dave Rubin: You guys are doing something right that most of the world has forgotten.
Dominik Tarczyński: True. Well, first of all, when you look at the data, the lowest unemployment in European Union, Poland, highest GDP after COVID, Poland, lowest rate of rapes, Poland, zero terrorist attacks. Always these four pillars. Every single time for years. Why? Because when this madness started in 2015, we stopped them. We did not let them in. So be like Poland, it's not just a hat, it's not just a merch. I'm trying to send a message. So whenever I go, I take this hat with me because I'm proud, because we are an example. Our conservative government is an example, how to deal with the problems.
The root of the problem is, and I must say that, not migration itself, but Islamization. It's a fact. So because Poland is the safest place in European Union, one of the safest places on Earth at the moment, and it's not my political opinion. Everyone can check that on internet, it's Eurostat official data. Because of that, many investors are very happy to come. Tourism is just booming.
Many people sending me messages. Why do you always repeat be like Poland? Because I'm proud. I'm proud of Copernicus. I'm proud of Chopin. I'm proud of King Sobieski. I'm proud of John Paul II. I'm proud of our wall at the border. I'm so proud of Poland, thousand years history throughout the ages, and I'm so proud that I am a politician, representative at this moment of history of humanity, not only Europeans.
So when someone will ask me, what did you do for Poland? I will say, I made it safe.
Dave Rubin: You know, it's so interesting because obviously I talk to politicians from all over the world, but particularly I find in Europe, they'll give me some version of I'm proud of my country, and they talk about the past, but they're not proud of what's going on now.
So you mentioned 2015 when this all went crazy related to immigration. So what is it that the Polish government saw that somehow the rest of the EU seemed not to see?
Dominik Tarczyński: Well, first of all, it's not about what we've seen, but it's about our experience. As I mentioned, Poland is thousand years history. We've been partitioned a hundred and twenty three years of non existence. Russia and Germany took over. We know what it means to be taken over. A hundred and twenty-three years of non existence on the map, and we survived.
Not only that. After partitions, we had a terrible World War II, six million Poles killed, all the elite killed, professors, priests, musicians. This is what we've lost. Then we get nearly 70 years of communism. We've been taken over after the war by Soviet Russia. So when Germany started this madness of illegal migration, cheap labor, actually, we said, no, we're not gonna let them in. We are Christian country, we are very devoted Catholics. We do not want enrichment in Poland. We are very happy as rich as we are.
So we decided, okay, the GDP will be going up slower, but we are going to be safe. And what happened? It's going, it's booming now. Because of our decisions in 2015.
So, as you know, one of our soldiers was killed with the spear. Our government, our parliament actually, all political powers changed the law that we can use live bullets now. So, you know what we're doing now? We shoot them. If you are trying to cross a border and harm any of our soldiers, you will be dead. This is what I said in the parliament. I said, do not come to the Polish border because you will be dead. Show that. It's not a joke.
So we are taking the safety, security very, very seriously because we know that this is a war. If there is a need, we use live bullets.
Dave Rubin: What kind of pushback do you get from I suppose we could call it the left in your country. But yeah. What kind of internal pushback do you get
Dominik Tarczyński: Obviously we do have a left, like every single country? They cry a lot, they cry loud, we don't give a shit. Well, as simple as that. I'm serious. I mean, we've got our own AOC, we've got our own?
Dave Rubin: What type of political power do they have?
Dominik Tarczyński: Now the liberals are taking the creating a government in Poland.
Dave Rubin: I don't think your liberal party is not purely leftist, because Americans get confused.
Dominik Tarczyński: No, no, no, no. I mean, you're your liberals, your democrats are communists. Right. I mean, I feel sorry for you. That's why I'm starting my job on Florida International University, and I'm gonna do lectures on communism in the past, present, and future. Because what I think my personal experience is very important to share it, it's gonna be more like testimony rather than teaching, because I was born in 1979. I remember communism. I remember being a six-year-old kid in a queue, queuing for all night to get shoes. I didn't get them, it wasn't enough. It was like Venezuela and Cuba. I experienced communism, I know what communism is.
And now I can hear Bernie Saunders, AOC, and all these lunatics, they are communists. It doesn't matter if they call themselves democrats, social democrats, socialists, they want to destroy this country.
Dave Rubin: Open the borders.
Dominik Tarczyński: Obviously, that's obvious. So if you do not want public services, if you don't want if you do not want an army police, you want open borders, there's no country. It's a pure communism. They are hedonists, they're thinking about themselves. Yeah, they don't even care about their own children and grandchildren. That is the problem.
So the difference between us, Republicans, conservatives, right wing, is to think about next generations and leave the country better than when you started to live in this country.
When you come to Poland, you will not believe. I had a the guy from Japan recently. He came from Japan asking me to do a tour, and I put the map on the table and I asked, and I told him, pick up the place. Not me, you pick up the place, we're gonna go there, you're gonna film it.
He picked all the places, he filmed it and he was crying. He switched off the camera and he was crying. And I said, Why are you crying? He says, I want Japan to be the same. And I said, I thought Japan is okay. You've got a beautiful prime minister now. Yeah, but he said, Yeah, yeah, she's okay, but we need time to clean the whole thing. It's a huge he was very emotional.
Dave Rubin: Right. If you think of a place like Japan can't do it, they they're obviously doing better. Of course, now they need time. She's the new prime minister is better. But the fact that they have a problem. It's beyond imagination.
Dominik Tarczyński: This process of illegal migration, it's not about poor people looking for a better life, but this is actual hijra, Arabic term of demographic war. This is not about poor people.
Look at look at Spain now. The guys will basi haga t-shirts with the iPhones. Yeah, they are asked who's gonna be a little bit more. while holding it yeah what are What are you doing in here? I'm looking for a better life.
Dave Rubin: No women. No kids.
Dominik Tarczyński: Just just force in their 20s, military age, thousands, like 80 thousands during the weekend. It's organized, it's a hijra. It's a demographic war. So if we will not realize that this is a war, if we will not realize that we have to react, in my opinion, from what I see, we have to change our language. We have to be brave to call things as they are. If someone is calling me Islamophobe fascist, I don't give a single shit. We have to call it as it is, because the main problem is still political correctness. I'm not correct in any way.
Dave Rubin: Do you think re-emigration or remigration, whatever they're calling it, do you think that there is any chance this is gonna work? I mean, you're gonna really put soldiers. Do you think any of these countries will do it?
Dominik Tarczyński: Give me three days. Versus what you will do. Give me three days. Three days, the whole problem will be solved.
We're gonna ask for 100 747 at the airport. We're gonna arrest them, we're gonna transport them, and we're gonna send them to Nigeria, Qatar, and other places. If they will not take them, we're gonna leave them where they are, we're gonna leave them in the countries where the plane's gonna go, we're gonna cut off all the contracts, we're gonna start with the sanctions, and that's it.
El Salvador is doing good with the gang members, it will solve in one month. The beautiful, great, beautiful prison was built, everyone is there, and that's it.
You have to have a man who is ready to do things which are unimaginable for many politicians. If we can organize Super Bowl, right? If we can organize like millions of people for pilgrimages of John Paul II, we can organize millions, remigrations for millions in three days. We need political power, political strength, and people who are not afraid.
It's not a problem to order a pizza or other food and check the papers. Not a problem at all. You put 200 agents calling for a pizza, you're asking them to come with delivery, you check the papers, that's it. I mean, there's hundreds of ways to get over it. But the most important, that's a joke, obviously, but you know what I meant. I'm being silly now, but you can organize it with the structure of your country. You can organize the whole process, but there must be a decision.
Milei is doing good, El Salvador is doing good, Brazil will do the same. I had this conversation with?
Dave Rubin: South America, Latin America seem to be, they all seem to be shifting to the right at the moment.
Dominik Tarczyński: Yes. What I hear from Great Britain, what I hear from Rupert Lowe, what I hear from even from Nigel sometimes, they are saying they're gonna do it.
Dave Rubin: What would you say to the average Republican in America right now? Obviously, we have a huge midterm election coming, and if it goes the wrong way, Trump is done in essence. It's gonna be very hard. to impeach him and it's going to be done. So, you know, the 10 plus years of Trumpism really will start disintegrating overnight. What would you say to the average Republican right now that's either running for re-election, trying to get in first time, or just the nominal person that's trying to decide what to do?
Dominik Tarczyński: Be like Poland. Be brave. Say as it is. Do not take money from anyone. Simple as that.
I'm gonna be very much involved in midterms. There are three candidates I'm gonna endorse and work for. I'll try my best to support Republicans and and again people are asking why do you care about America? America does not elect you, they're not electing you. Why you care? Because if America is weak, Europe is gone.
Dave Rubin: Does the marriage of communism and jihadism seem just obviously?
Dominik Tarczyński: That's that's obvious bound. It's obvious. Who's supporting who's supporting Hamas? Yeah. The leftists. When you see campuses, all the left are supporting Hamas. All the left are laughing at 9-11 memorial.
Left and jihadists are cancer to this world. And I'm gonna heal this world, I believe, with the help of friends from America and other places, Brazil and others. We have to work on it, we have to fight for our freedom. And this is not just a slogan. I mean physical freedom. People do not know. They think that this beautiful word socialism means equality. How naive you are, how stupid you are.
So I cannot understand why people are thinking that capitalism is so bad because you have to work. Oh, that's bad.
As we know, most of the mainstream media are left, right? How can we fight? We have to work harder. We have to do as much, twice as much or triple times more than others. That's the fact. It shouldn't be like that. That's the reality. Do not cry, fight.
Dave Rubin: Do you think Donald Trump would really do all the things that you would want him to do that you think that the Europeans need to do?
Dominik Tarczyński: Okay, I'm gonna say something which is unpopular now, but I'm gonna say it. Donald Trump is the best president of the United States in history. And I know it's gonna be a lot of all of people who disagree.
The way they attack Donald Trump is it never happened in the history of this country. I'm gonna be the first one to build a statute to this man in Europe. I'm serious. I'm gonna do it. I'm gonna pay for it, I'm gonna do it.
He saved the world from the wokness. I think he is the best president because what he did for us, for Polish, for Europe. No one no one ever did apart from Reagan. No one ever.
So there is hundreds, hundreds of reasons I can tell you why he is the best president. He's not saint, he's not cloistered. Not me. Not everyone. We made mistakes. And a politic, you know, politics is a very live organism. There are many vectors changing the situation. But there was no one better to bring this American pride back.
After 47 years since revolution started, now we have a chance for free Iran. Do you know how many thousands of Iranians are sending messages? Please help us, please help us, over 40,000 people killed.
So he knew that he's gonna pay a huge political price because people do not like spend money on wars, this and that. But sometimes when you get a bad tooth, you have to get rid of it and paid for it. It's painful, costly. But you have to do it. You have to do it.
From my perspective, from European perspective, he's the bravest. He didn't have to do it with all his money, connections, lifestyle, he didn't have to do it. He did.
I was complaining. I was campaigning for him. I went to Salem, Virginia and other places, and I saw him behind the stage. Before he went out. He's a lion. I mean, he is a lion. He is a great example. Great example of a man, of a politician.
I'm gonna do whatever I can to support Republicans and Donald Trump.
When you look from the distance, when you're not looking at today's events, but when you look from the distance, within the time he's gonna be missed so much as a president. People will realize how great president he was.
Dave Rubin: I agree.
Dominik Tarczyński: How he make you proud. He made you proud as a nation. And this is the most motivation for work, for whatever you do in life, for your family. Everyone is proud again. The way you're thinking about your nation, about your patriotism, about being a man, it's a manhood too. To be responsible for your actions, think about future and others, and leave this place better when you're gone.
We need a legacy. We need to be more than eat and sleep. We need to be someone who history will judge as a good man. To be a good man is to love your own country. Sometimes this love is hard, just like in a relation, but you still love this country.
So my message would be please do not let communists take over this beautiful country.
Dave Rubin: And that is how you end an interview.
Dominik Tarczyński: Thank you so much.
Bob Metz:
That was Poland's Dominik Tarczyński speaking truths that terrify the left, that no one in the mainstream media would ever raise because well, as Tarczyński himself said, most MSM are left.
But given the overarching theme of our weekly broadcast just right, what I found very promising in hearing our selected speakers today is that they all pretty much got their political polarities right, as in correct. As Tarczyński described the left in Poland, he said, yes, we do have a left and they are hedonists. They don't even care about their own children and grandchildren. Tarczyński has identified leftists and all the left as those who are supporting Hamas, who laugh at the 9-11 memorial, and who promote Islamism.
And he correctly concludes that the left and jihadists are a cancer to this world.
"They think the word socialism means equality, how naive and stupid they are. So I cannot understand why people are thinking that capitalism is so bad. Because you have to work?"
Yeah, that's exactly why those on the left think capitalism is bad. Because they would have to work to sustain themselves rather than voting to rob those who are working.
"The difference between us Republicans, conservatives, and the right wing is to think about the next generations and leave the country better than when you first arrived," he says. And to the extent that you can get those on the right wing to at least accept that principle as a starting point, it certainly draws a clear line between them and the left.
But one thing that concerns me if the right keeps trying to debate or negotiate with the left, the war for what is right will be lost.
It seems to me that given the sheer nihilism of everything left, that in some way, shape, or form, the only way to deal with them is the way they promote every issue they support. Just use force and violence. Tarczyński's prescription of how to deal with them just might be the only ultimate option. Just shoot them.
The left is not a rational entity. But given Trump's assertion that the UN has great potential, clearly its identity and purpose must be defined. Is the UN a court? A governing body? An international military? A dispute resolution mechanism? I mean, the very name, the United Nations, suggests a potential contradiction in the same way that the name the European Union does. Each name expresses a sense of unity, and in politics, calls for unity often disguise agendas as far removed from unity as one could get.
And then of course, there's the United States. Which brings us full circle to our show opener today from the 1943 movie A Stranger in Town. And I quote:
"The kind of government we get is the kind we want. Government of the people and by the people and for the people can mean any kind of government. It's our duty to make it mean only one kind. Uncorrupted, free, united."
And yes, freedom is the only real political unity one can achieve. And beyond the point of unity, quote, "as citizens, we carry a burning responsibility when we elect men to office. We can't do it as lightly as flipping a coin. After voting, we can't just sit back and say our job is done. It doesn't concern us. That philosophy of indifference is what enemies of decent government want." end quote.
And the principle to which that quote points is what we have long been calling eternal vigilance on this show. And why we must remain so, because remember the old political axiom, even if you aren't interested in politics, politics is always interested in you.
So it's reassuring to know that there are increasingly more eternally vigilant political voices emerging from significant political positions. My purpose in presenting today's show was to demonstrate that even though we may not always hear about them or know who they are, there truly are world leaders hard at work moving the political zeitgeist in the right direction.
Something we shall endeavor to do when you join us again next week, on our journey in the right direction. And until then, be right, stay right, do right, act right, think right, and be right back here. We'll see you then.
Clip (Ben Bankas, September 24, 2026):
Ben Bankas: I'm relearning Canadian.
So nice to be back on the shores of Lake America. People go, the last part about Toronto is on the lake. Yeah, that's the American part.
F'ing unbelievable. I don't know. I'd be happy if America took over at this point. I mean. it'd be a celebration. The only people who'd be pissed off if the Americans took over would be the liberal white people. Because the conservatives would be like, oh, fuck yeah, I'm moving to Tampa.
And all the illegal immigrants would be happy because they'd be like, I am American now. Our whole plan was to sneak in, but now we don't have to. I live in Brampton, USA.