764 – The S.A.D.S. reality about vaccines

 3 Responses »
Jun 232022
 


The death toll from the mandated “Covid” vaccines is simply staggering. Even more staggering is how government officials, politicians, and the state-funded medical establishment can completely ignore the deaths and injuries of millions while continuing to prescribe and mandate the instrument of their deaths.

To avoid this reality – and their direct responsibility for causing these deaths – they have invented the term “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” (SADS). Worse, thanks to analysis of data accumulated over the years following the introduction of mass vaccinations in the 1960s, it now appears that this evasion of reality and responsibility was also behind the invention of the term “Sudden Infant Death Syndrome” (SIDS).

“For everybody out there that’s bragging that they’ve been vaccinated and they don’t have symptoms, what they don’t realize is that’s the equivalent of not waking up in a house fire.”

Dr Tau Braun’s chilling observation is but one of many similar statements made by a growing number of doctors, researchers, scientists and even undertakers, thanks to data now clearly available which consistently demonstrates a link between “vaccinations” and “sudden” deaths. The only way politicians can hide from this truth is through censorship, propaganda, and other coercive means. And that’s exactly what they are planning to do.

“The only things you should be frightened of are your governments’ reactions to this alleged threat, and the vaccines themselves,” warns former Pfizer chief (respiratory) science officer Dr Mike Yeadon. SADly, he’s Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

762 – Gunning for control—of the gun control narrative

 2 Responses »
Jun 092022
 


The sudden absence of the state-funded media’s news coverage and commentary on the Uvalde Texas school shootings was telling. Following days of news reports that were completely contradictory with each subsequent report, the coverage suddenly stopped.

However, what did remain consistent with each day’s news update were calls for gun control and for the disarming of the nation. But then even those stopped, following revelations that the proper and legal use of guns could easily have prevented the unnecessary deaths of 19 innocent school children.

Sadness and anger over the events as they appear to have transpired at Robb Elementary School can be overwhelming. The utter incompetence overtly displayed by authorities overseeing the shootings has led to serious speculation that there’s much more than ‘incompetence’ at play.

Indeed, previous mass school shootings are being closely scrutinized and it appears that they all seem to have certain disturbing elements and patterns in common. To put it bluntly: Were calls for gun controls a consequence of the shootings, or were the shootings a consequence of the gun control agenda?

It’s a disarming narrative, either way you look at it. And ‘disarming’ is certainly the best way to describe the phenomenon of mass school shootings in a way that’s Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

761 – Canada’s foreign rationale on foreign policy | Salim Mansur

 Comments Off on 761 – Canada’s foreign rationale on foreign policy | Salim Mansur
Jun 022022
 


In light of the history and status of Canada in the geopolitical world conveyed by our guest Salim Mansur, Canada’s current involvement in Ukraine makes it clear that its foreign policy has not been crafted in the interests of Canadians.

Without any due process or public debate, the Canadian government has joined the United Nations’ globalist effort to cause a “regime change” in Russia. “Putin and his henchmen are war criminals,” outrageously declared Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, in projecting her own culpability in supporting Ukraine’s neo-nazis onto Putin.

Canada has no legitimate role in Ukraine that serves either the interests or security of Canadians. Worse, Canada is supporting the true war criminals in the Ukraine conflict. Without a clearly defined foreign policy that puts Canada first, suggests Salim, Canada will be forever acting in the interests of a globalist agenda.

It seems that “foreign to reason” may be the simplest way to describe Canada’s foreign policy in a way that’s Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

760 – Projecting a state of freedom | Derek Proulx

 Comments Off on 760 – Projecting a state of freedom | Derek Proulx
May 262022
 


“Live free or die” is the state motto of New Hampshire, and our guest Derek Proulx, a volunteer with the Free State Project elaborates: “…for death is not the worst of evils – slavery is.”

The strategy behind the project depends upon attracting a significant number of liberty-minded activists to a single state, one with a low enough population to effectively enable them to lobby and influence the local culture so as to elect more freedom-oriented political representatives to local governments.

Remarkably, there are other similar projects springing up, such as one now underway in Alberta involving the separation of that province from the rest of Canada. Its proponents argue that Alberta must be freed from the tyranny and “abuse” of the federal government.

But why these strategies? It appears the realization that freedom-loving people are a minority is causing many of them to create a refuge from the submissive majority. The success of their efforts is being measured against how well a particular ‘free state’ can maintain its independence and freedom segregated from the majority culture.

In the short run, this strategy can be judged successful but the greater challenge – and long-term danger – still remains. A free state cannot long co-exist next to a tyrannical state, let alone within one, as is the case with provinces and states within their republics or confederations. History and logic both demonstrate that the more dominant state will inevitably rule the smaller.

Thus the necessity of inculcating a philosophy and deep understanding of the nature of individual freedom remains an eternal task, one that must be directed beyond the confines of a segregated jurisdiction. Establishing a universal awareness and appreciation of freedom’s profound virtue and benefits is a cultural pre-requisite towards establishing any free state – or free nation – or free world – in a manner that’s Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

759 – It’s party time in Ontario—the freedom to party and a party to freedom | Paul McKeever | Mike McMullen

 Comments Off on 759 – It’s party time in Ontario—the freedom to party and a party to freedom | Paul McKeever | Mike McMullen
May 192022
 


When it comes to Ontario’s 2022 provincial election now under way, it appears that there are more politicians wanting the freedom to party than there are who want a party to freedom.

Considering the number of political parties now registered in the province of Ontario, it’s alarming to realize that only one is a party to freedom. That party is the Freedom Party of Ontario (FPO) and its leader Paul McKeever (also FPO’s candidate in London North Centre) joins us to describe why this is so.

Along the way, Paul offers a history of Freedom Party and of the Ontario government’s persistent manipulation of the electoral system – and of political parties – since FPO’s founding in 1984.

On the federal front it’s much the same story, where the only party to freedom is the People’s Party of Canada (PPC). Past PPC candidate for London West, Mike McMullen, joins us to describe why he also feels comfortable now running as a provincial 2022 candidate for Freedom Party in his same riding.

Having participated in provincial candidate debates, both Paul and Mike have noticed how any discussion of the government’s pandemic response over the past few years is being entirely avoided by the other parties, and how they’re all desperately pretending it’s politics as usual. Most noticeable is the absence of any Progressive Conservative (PC) candidates at the debates, particularly given that the ruling PC party is the party most responsible for the government’s mishandling of the entire pandemic controversy.

Calling for the government to be held accountable for its incredible violations of individual freedom during the past few years is a key objective of Freedom Party’s 2022 election platform appropriately titled: Truth Rights Justice Freedom.

It’s also why, as the party’s own literature proclaims, Freedom Party is Ontario’s only party that’s “Just Right for Ontario.”

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

758 – Man of the people | Maxime Bernier

 Comments Off on 758 – Man of the people | Maxime Bernier
May 122022
 


“We need an ideological revolution,” recommends our guest Maxime Bernier, leader of the People’s Party of Canada (PPC).

As a former member of the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) who narrowly (and suspiciously) lost a CPC leadership bid, Bernier served as Minister of Foreign Affairs and as chairman of the Committee on National Defense. So when he says that the CPC is “intellectually and morally bankrupt,” his observation is based on direct experience.

“It’s not our war,” says Bernier about the situation in Ukraine. Calling for diplomatic negotiation instead of military escalation, he has found that this view has become an unacceptable discussion point in Canada, where the Trudeau government is forcing Canadian taxpayers to fund the very escalation he fears.

Sadly, reaching Canadians with news about the PPC or its take on the issues has become an uphill struggle. In a country whose fourth estate has been transformed into a taxpayer-funded propaganda machine, the odds of any objective reporting about the PPC or its leader from this media are remote indeed.

Because he has wisely refused to take state-mandated injections, Bernier has been prohibited from travelling freely within his own country. Consequently, Bernier has joined with former Newfoundland premier Brian Peckford (one of the original framers of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms) to file a lawsuit against the Trudeau government’s violation of everyone’s constitutional right to travel in Canada.

No one, let alone a leader of a national party, should ever be subject to travel restrictions or injection mandates. In the face of the Left’s contempt for individual freedom, Bernier’s style of “doing politics differently” becomes a necessity. Of course, everyone already knows that being Just Right is about as different from how politics is done today as it gets.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

757 – Putting freedom on the ballot

 Comments Off on 757 – Putting freedom on the ballot
May 052022
 


“I’ve been offside with public opinion,” confessed Ontario’s MPP Randy Hillier in announcing his decision to withdraw from Ontario politics early in March. Concluding that Ontario is being ruled “by the mob,” Hillier cited the sad fact that it was many members of the public “who encouraged our government to take these excessive (Covid) measures to allay their fears.”

As someone who had recently planned to form his own Ontario political party to field candidates in the June 2 Ontario election –now under way – the reasons for his decision to entirely withdraw from the political arena are chilling and warrant everyone’s attention.

“I’ve come to the conclusion that there is no political solution to what ails society,” Hillier lamented. “The only way back to a free country is if we re-engage with the public and help shape public opinion – help people understand the value of freedom.”

Hillier’s advice is right on the money. As Ontarians head into the 2022 election, there is a level of hostility towards freedom greater than at any other time in the nation’s history. Electorally, this does not bode well for any candidates or political parties calling for freedom, but at the same time it demonstrates the need to “shape public opinion – help people understand the value of freedom.”

It seems self-evident that before winning freedom through the ballot box, it must first exist in the hearts and minds of voters themselves. Less evident is the price that must be paid to make this happen. It requires those who love freedom – more than they fear losing elections – to use electoral opportunities to campaign for freedom even against the odds.

As things look right now, it may be a long time indeed before conditions in Ontario are Just Right to result in freedom through the ballot box, but it’s always the right time to put freedom ‘on’ the ballot.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

 Older Entries  Newer Entries