843 – The missionary position—on sex, politics, and religion

 Comments Off on 843 – The missionary position—on sex, politics, and religion
Jan 182024
 


“We’re far more divided than we thought – between people who see freedom as God defines it and those who see freedom as they define it.” So declared one Christian spokesman regarding the current “freedom alliance” on the Right.

Surprisingly, his concern was primarily based on differing sexual attitudes and lifestyles: “God created marriage for one man and one woman, for life, and any sex outside of that is a sin and against nature.”

While this choice of lifestyle is perfectly legitimate for those who choose to adopt it, turning it in to a point of division between those who differ is tragically self-defeating. It is as if to argue that no political alliance is possible unless everyone in that alliance uses the missionary position. This is a complete non sequitur in the greater war on tyranny, where the only consensus required for alliance is the acceptance of individual freedom.

Different attitudes on sexuality are unnecessarily divisive when brought into any political sphere or arena. By sexuality in this context we mean disagreements over consentual lifestyle choices, not on the tyranny of gender politics.

Thanks to gender identity politics, sexuality has become yet another area of disagreement and division. But gender politics is not about sex or about sexuality. It is about creating division and conflict in the political arena.

It’s unfortunate that some in the religious community are using their own personal sexual beliefs to create further division. Complete unanimity between differing religious groups, faiths and those who profess no specific religious views is not a necessity in the broader war against the current tyranny.

The current “freedom alliance” need not be threatened from within. All it takes to keep it intact is a consensus of freedom that is Just Right for everyone.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

822 – UFO disclosures—alien threat or earthly distraction?

 Comments Off on 822 – UFO disclosures—alien threat or earthly distraction?
Aug 032023
 


In light of the recent UFO disclosure hearings before the US congress, it is interesting to observe that debate over the UFO phenomenon is as divisive as any of the current political conflicts have been.

More alarmingly, the controversies surrounding UFO disclosures possess many parallels to the controversies regarding everything from the war in Ukraine to fighting climate change.

If ever there was an issue that exposes the willingness or unwillingness of people to accept a narrative purported to be true, it is the alienated issue of UFOs (unidentified flying objects) and the implications of extraterrestrial intelligent life capable of advanced technology.

It’s a polarizing prospect. The nature of the issue forces a binary choice upon those hearing such narratives. Believe. Disbelieve.

Those who claim to maintain an “open mind” on the subject are often permanent skeptics rarely open about what evidence or testimony would sway them one way or the other. By default, this puts them in the “disbelieve” camp since in this context there are no third options. Alien agnosticism still means that the alien proposition has not been accepted.

For most earth-bound human beings any serious discussion about aliens and UFOs is a discussion also alien to the daily concerns of their lives. On the other hand, for those fascinated with the topic and convinced that its implications are profound, the broader lack of interest in so grand a revelation can be both frustrating and infuriating.

When it comes to UFO disclosures, many appear to be anticipating some kind of public reaction that’s Just Right, when in fact there may be no such thing.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

803 – Weathering the political climate change | Matthew Wielicki

 Comments Off on 803 – Weathering the political climate change | Matthew Wielicki
Mar 232023
 


With the credentials and experience to challenge official narratives about fighting “climate change,” our guest Dr Matthew Wielicki offers us his insights into many of the emerging climate-related debates.

From the controversial “greenhouse gas” status of carbon dioxide to competing theories (biotic versus abiotic) regarding the origin of so-called fossil fuels, Dr Wielicki bridges apparent contradictions and misunderstandings with his own informed narrative. And, in explaining earth’s known climate history revealing that ice at the poles is not typical, he describes the Milankovitch cycles in a way that makes it easy to understand the presence of today’s polar ice caps.

It seems almost incomprehensible that politicians keep forcing us to fight “climate change” – a bizarre concept suggesting that climate should never change. Recall that “climate change” was the replacement term for “global warming” after it was observed that the ever-expected warming never seemed to materialize, and indeed, cooling trends were being observed.

Ironically, carbon dioxide still remains the official culprit behind all temperature “changes” – even though CO2 was exclusively linked to warming as a “greenhouse gas” and never with stability or cooling. In the face of such a glaring contradiction continuing to be used to “drive policy decisions” regarding climate, it is clear that our politicians have an agenda unrelated to climate.

It is only when one realizes that the real “climate change” at issue is our political climate, that one can appreciate official “climate change” narratives in a way that is Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Fear no evil—Exposing the climate change cult | Matthew Wielicki

 Environmentalism, Globalism, Latest, Politics, Science, Science & Tech., Society, Video  Comments Off on Fear no evil—Exposing the climate change cult | Matthew Wielicki
Mar 132023
 


After having been overshadowed by the COVID campaign of terror, and as we become inured to the horrors of the war in Ukraine, the spectre of climate change is again beginning to come to the fore.

With countries like Canada implementing “Just Transition” legislation designed to put the country on a path of “Net-Zero” carbon dioxide emissions, and the United States refusing life-enhancing pipeline projects like Keystone XL, we are witnessing the destruction of Western civilization and capitalism, a degradation of our living standards, and an elimination of our rights.

Climate change is a religion. It comes complete with a god—Gaia, a hell—boiling oceans, catechism—the Paris Accord, and priests and priestesses—Al Gore and Greta Thunberg.

As with any religion, there is a litany of sins, some minor such as eating meat, and some mortal such as driving more than 15 minutes from your home. And with every sin, there is an appropriate penance, $40 for a pound of ground chuck and carbon taxes on gasoline.

The religion of climate change is based on faith and fear. We must have faith in the wisdom our priests and priestesses and we must fear the coming Armageddon, the retribution of a vengeful Gaia if their words are not heeded.

Thankfully there are plenty of heretics out there to nail some scientific sense to the door of the church of climate change in protest.

Dr. Matthew Wielicki, assistant professor in the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Alabama, arms us with some facts, any one of which would expose the false religion of climate change, but when put together obliterate it and make a laughing stock out of its false prophets.

– CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential for plant life and more is better.
– We are in the middle of an ice age.
– Ice at the Earth’s poles is not the norm.
– Earth’s changing orbit around the sun is the primary driving force for climate change.
– Man’s contribution to climate change is insignificant.
– One cannot buy one’s way into heaven on Earth by paying a carbon tithe.

And now that we’ve almost milked the religion metaphor to death (and probably offended every Catholic and Protestant reading this) let’s watch Dr. Wielicki show us the way, the truth, and the life we should enjoy once we dispel our unfounded fear of the climate change cult.

Also available on these platforms:

Rumble
Odysee
Robert’s Substack

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

788 – Always mention freedom | Dr Laura Braden

 Comments Off on 788 – Always mention freedom | Dr Laura Braden
Dec 082022
 


“Never mention ivermectin” warns our guest Dr Laura Braden who learned that lesson the hard way.

Her experience mirrored our own 2020 observation that “prohibitions against prescribing hydroxychloroquine to COVID-19 patients is the smoking gun that makes those behind these measures prime suspects in a conspiracy of mass murder never before seen in Western nations.“

Like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin is known for its effectiveness in fighting the causes and symptoms associated with various viral infections. But under today’s medical tyranny where all solutions require injections, alternate inexpensive and effective treatments are unwelcome to those in the business of pushing injections at taxpayer expense.

As a molecular immunologist, Dr Braden was suspicious about the whole pandemic from the outset. Now after having discovered how the word “ivermectin” throws fear into the hearts of the heartless medical establishment, she has added another word to her arsenal against medical tyranny: “freedom.”

She is director of the Board of Taking Back Our Freedoms, whose mission is “to educate and empower people to take back their freedoms.” With freedom as its operative principle and objective, we can expect that today’s politicians and governments will do whatever they can to “never mention” its existence, just as they never mention their own culpability in having stolen our freedoms in the first place.

Never mentioning ivermectin is a sinister and pathetic censorship strategy intended to obscure the truth. Always mentioning freedom is the starting point for a transparent and open free speech strategy proven to be Just Right when it comes to discovering any truth.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Return of the primitive | Salim Mansur

 Arts & Entertainment, Books, Environmentalism, Ideas, Latest, Objectivism, Politics, Science & Tech., Socialism, Society, Space, Video  Comments Off on Return of the primitive | Salim Mansur
Nov 302022
 

Actions by Leftists over the years can only lead one to conclude that they are members of a death cult.

Attempts to describe the Left have generally been in economic terms: socialist, fascist, communist, Fabian, etc., but if we go back to 1969 we discover that one philosopher, Ayn Rand, described the Left in a way that stands to this day as accurate and even prophetic.

In her book The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution, which was re-released as Return of the Primitive we find an essay that compared the Left to the Greek god Dionysus—the god of insanity, frenzy, and drunkenness and the Right with the god Apollo the “averter of evil,” the god of light, truth, education, and reason.

Rand uses two events of that year, the launch of Apollo 11 and the music festival near Woodstock, to startlingly juxtapose those two elements in society which seem forever at odds with each other—man’s lofty rational nature and his baser bestial nature.

Salim Mansur joins Robert Vaughan to discuss Rand’s insight into the fundamental nature of man and, in particular, the insanity of the Left.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

715 – Parallels—From climate to Covid | Dave Plumb

 Comments Off on 715 – Parallels—From climate to Covid | Dave Plumb
Jul 152021
 


Politely declining to be acknowledged an ‘expert,’ our guest Dave Plumb prefers to share his knowledge in a scholarly manner, much as he did with the publication of his book on climate change, Inconveniently Screwed.

With a future round of planned lockdowns based on climate change, it should come as no surprise that the political parallels between ‘the climate crisis’ and ‘the Covid crisis’ share more in common than a lockdown mentality. They are both elements of the same ongoing political agenda of fascism: state control of every personal and public aspect of individual lives and choices.

The mantra driving both issues follows the same propaganda message: ‘Just follow the science.’ The reality driving both issues is that science has been tossed out the window entirely, replaced by a Marxist ideology under which ‘facts don’t matter.’

But facts DO matter, argues Dave, as he arms us with the very facts “conveniently forgotten” by the likes of everyone from Al Gore to Justin Trudeau. From Rossby waves caused by planetary rotation, to the tropopause boundary between the northern and southern hemispheres, Dave’s scholarly approach to these complex issues of climate has recently been turned from climate towards Covid.

As Dave has inconveniently discovered, getting the facts about the Covid crisis is not as easy as getting the facts regarding the climate crisis, thanks to an unprecedented level of censorship and media control whenever Covid is mentioned. Thus, using the same investigative and scholarly approach he applied regarding climate change, a parallel truth about Covid emerges: facts don’t matter and neither climate change nor Covid present the kind of dangers being attributed to them.

As we should all know by now, but many still do not know, censorship and controls are only employed when the message being controlled is Just Right and the censor is just wrong.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

 Older Entries