Category: Ideas | Just Right Media

The Psychology of Gangsters and Psychopaths | Robert Vaughan

Culture, Ethics, Foreign Relations, Globalism, Ideas, Journalism, Latest, Politics, Reality, Society, Video Comments Off

Dec 302025

Robert Vaughan was interviewed by Rasheed Muhammad on The Red Pill Diaries on December 26.

With a formal background in psychology and as a political commentator for Just Right Media, Robert delved into a range of topics. He began with an examination of the psychological mindset of Western leaders, whom he characterized as morally corrupt, psychopathic, or sociopathic figures influenced by subjectivist philosophies derived from Karl Marx, the Frankfurt School, post-structuralism, and contemporary woke ideology.

He contrasted this with an objective view of reality and critiqued the leaders’ lack of self-reflection, empathy, or willingness to admit errors, attributing their behavior to a pursuit of power and corruption.

Later in the discussion, topics included media manipulation and state funding in Canada, the intentional dumbing down of education systems leading to societal decline, and the role of blackmail, cliques, and the deep state in perpetuating detrimental policies, such as support for Ukraine and neoconservative foreign interventions.

The dialogue also addressed the rapid cultural and moral decay in the West, disappointments with figures like Donald Trump, the influence of bureaucracy on presidents, and America’s historical shift toward global hegemony contrary to its founding principles.

The discussion concluded with an analysis of the rise of the Global South, China’s economic and technological ascendancy, the end of unipolar U.S. dominance, and optimism for a multipolar world focused on individual peace and flourishing rather than enforced domination.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider making a donation:
🧡 PayPal

943 – Intrinsically subjective—objectively speaking

Comments Off

Dec 172025

“The belief that truth is purely subjective is a far greater threat than any other because that will strike at the core of our reasoning, and ultimately to our ability to choose between right and wrong,” asserted American politician and social media influencer Nick Freitas to a crowd of young Republicans at the University of California, Berkeley earlier this month. “I have never bought in to this truly ridiculous notion that truth is subjective.”

Subjectivism is the belief that reality is not a firm absolute, but something which can be altered by the consciousness of the perceiver. Objectivity is the only way to determine what is true, Freitas rightly argued. And on this point fellow Christians Matt Walsh and Tucker Carlson likewise asserted that objective truth exists and that we must agree that there ‘is’ a truth.

Unfortunately, when many Christians on the Right correctly assert that Truth can only be determined objectively, their definition of ‘objective’ is far from being so. Continue reading »

940 – Right wingers—from fragmentation to stagnation

Comments Off

Nov 262025

It’s bad enough when those on the Right publicly exhibit internal ideological conflicts; it’s even worse when those conflicts become personal.

For example, says Ben Shapiro: “The fragmentation of the political right is caused purposely by a splinter faction led by Nick Fuentes. They’re white supremacists; they hate women, Jews, Christians, brown people, blacks, America’s foreign policy and constitution, and they admire Hitler and Stalin,” and “Tucker Carlson is an intellectual coward, a dishonest interlocutor, and a terrible friend.”

Says Mark Levin: “Tucker is a racist so, no, I don’t debate the Klan and I don’t debate Nazis.”

Says Tucker Carlson: “Mark Levin is full of hate. (He supports) killing kids because you don’t like their parents. He is describing blood guilt.”

You get the general idea – not exactly inspiring displays of reasoned debate or clearly defined principles. And these are but a few examples.

The concern has been raised as to whether or not the various conflicts between recognized voices of the ‘Right’ will cause a fragmentation on the Right serious enough to compromise the MAGA movement and its resistance to the Left.

Whether or not these conflicts will evolve from a minor right wing fragmentation to another major right wing stagnation is something impossible to predict.

But to suggest that these disagreements are being aired and debated in a way that is Just Right depends on whether one takes them seriously or just as comedic entertainment.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

939 – Socialism—not very social

Comments Off

Nov 192025

Thanks to the recent election of Zohran Mamdani as the City of New York’s ‘socialist’ mayor, there have been increasing alarms warning of a rise in ‘socialism’s popularity’ among a majority of America’s young people. However, this may be an overstatement.

While it is fair to say that there has been a rise in the number of socialist politicians getting elected, to attribute these electoral wins to any love of socialism is simply misguided. Why? Because the average ‘socialist voter’ has no concept of socialism, either in terms of its definition or in terms of its horrific history. They are voting ‘against’ something, not for it.

Socialism, as an understandable or relatable concept, has little or no relevance to most voters’ daily concerns and lives. To them, socialism is just some nebulous label that politicians use to belittle one another (even though they may all behave the same and pursue the same socialist policies).

In practice, socialism is the political application of the philosophy of egalitarianism. Socialist ‘equality’ does not mean ‘equality before and under the law’ – it means equity: the ‘equality’ of results. It means that those who work hard, take risks, and produce the goods, services, and products upon which a society’s survival depends, must be punished to the degree of their success, while those who do not fit into the productive class (for whatever reason) are to be rewarded by sharing in the products they had no part in creating. Continue reading »

931 – Turning Right—by awakening to the Left

Comments Off

Sep 242025

The Left is in a frenzy trying to associate the assassination of Charlie Kirk with the Right, an impossibility given the evidence. But facts and evidence have never mattered to those on the Left.

Finding himself in the middle of the frenzy, late-night show host Jimmy Kimmel was briefly suspended by ABC due to his political commentary (masquerading as comedy) claiming that Kirk was assassinated by the MAGA Right. Unfortunately for Kimmel, there was no evidence to justify this and a mountain of confirmed evidence pointing to the Left.

Attempting to portray the Left as the side against violence, many are now trying to talk ‘unity’ and walk back some of the hateful Leftist reactions to Kirk’s assassination, including Barack Hussein Obama.

In his recent fake condemnation of those who support the violence, he announced: “Let the record say that on both sides undoubtedly there are people who are extremists and who say things that are contrary to what I believe are America’s core values.” Continue reading »

930 – The Charlie Kirk turning point—from ballots to bullets

Comments Off

Sep 172025

Last week’s assassination of Charlie Kirk sent a shock wave across the world that exposed the political polarities of Left and Right on a scale never before experienced.

An American political activist on the Right, Kirk founded the conservative organization Turning Point USA and was its executive director until his untimely demise on the Utah Valley University campus on September 10.

While the tragedy of Charlie Kirk’s murder is its own horror story, a greater horror story has been the reaction of those on the Left who have celebrated his murder with calls for even more murders, including those of Kirk’s wife and children.

This has presented those on the Right with a moral dilemma: how to oppose the Left without having to resort to violence. Unlike the Right, the Left does not honor the ballot box; it worships the bullet. Continue reading »

927 – When objective isn’t—there’s Objectivism

Comments Off

Aug 272025

Sad to say, the vast majority of people do not take philosophy seriously, even though they are helplessly in its grip. It is understandable that with with all of the competing ideologies and perspectives on the nature and purpose of human life, philosophy is seen by many simply as another religion without the element of deity – a subjective secular belief system.

Enter philosopher-novelist Ayn Rand, whose philosophy of Objectivism has a name that specifically refutes the subjective, and who since having arrived on America’s philosophical frontier, established a reputation unlike that of any other philosopher. She self-identified as being on the Right, which she associated with freedom and capitalism.

But there are many others who self-identify as being on the Right, who completely reject Ayn Rand’s philosophy, not because of its principles which they rarely mention, but because of its messenger.

“Ayn Rand is a modernist atheist radical individualist; what about that is conservative?” asked the Daily Wire’s Michael Knowles on his April 4 podcast during which he ranked the greatest philosophers. Continue reading »