104 – Socialism vs communism / Government Motors / London Board of Control

 Comments Off on 104 – Socialism vs communism / Government Motors / London Board of Control
May 212009
 

Government Motors

 
 
 
 

General Motors And Chrysler – Socialism, Pensions And Government
Communists On London City Council – In Denial
London’s Board Of Control – You Can’t Change The Rules After You’ve Played The Game
What About Democracy? City Hall Communists Say: “Take Four Votes Away. That’s Democratic.”
Check You Local Dictionary – There Is No Difference Between Socialism And Communism

051 – Guests: David Aldred, Mary Lou Ambrogio, Arthur Majoor

 Comments Off on 051 – Guests: David Aldred, Mary Lou Ambrogio, Arthur Majoor
Apr 242008
 

London City Hall

The Forest City Institute:
Civic Governance In The City Of London, Ontario

PLEASE NOTE: Due to a technical difficulty with the broadcast server approximately 2 minutes of the program was not archived.

012 – Gas prices / Election reform / TV tech

 Comments Off on 012 – Gas prices / Election reform / TV tech
Jul 052007
 

Iranian Gas

 

Gas prices: Why Iran rations gas
Ontario election reform: One ballot, two choices?
Government doing good
TV technologies

006 – Gas prices / Afghan war / Monarchy / Environmentalism

 Comments Off on 006 – Gas prices / Afghan war / Monarchy / Environmentalism
May 242007
 

Queen signs Constitution

 

On this broadcast of Just Right, we addressed several pressing issues that continue to reflect fundamental principles of economics, politics, and philosophy. We began with the perennial complaints about rising gas prices, exposing the hypocrisy of politicians who decry high prices while simultaneously advocating policies to reduce consumption. As we explained, prices reflect the immutable law of supply and demand—a natural equilibrium that politicians like Liberal MP Dan McTeague and Progressive Conservative proposals foolishly seek to manipulate through increased regulation or advance notice requirements. Such interventions only lead to shortages, rationing, and further distortions of the market.

We then turned to Canada’s mission in Afghanistan, supporting Prime Minister Harper’s commitment despite public weariness fueled by media narratives. With relatively low casualties compared to everyday risks at home, we argued that abandoning the mission prematurely would constitute defeat. Negotiating with the Taliban, as suggested by some, is absurd given their ideological intransigence.

The date also prompted reflection on our constitutional monarchy. Far from irrelevant, we contended that this institution, evolved since the Magna Carta, serves as a bulwark limiting government power and preserving individual rights—a superior safeguard compared to republics that too easily devolve into unchecked statism.

Finally, we delved deeply into the environmentalist movement, reading an prescient 1969 essay by Ayn Rand that unmasks its anti-industrial, anti-human essence. Environmentalism, we demonstrated, is not about genuine pollution control (a technological issue) but about imposing collectivist dictatorship under the guise of ecological crusade. A caller’s passionate defense of balance with nature highlighted the spiritual underpinnings of this ideology, yet underscored how it often justifies coercing others.

These discussions reaffirm that true progress lies in defending individual freedom and reason against collectivist assaults. Awareness of these connections is just right.