Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 52:51 — ) | Embed
The Forest City Institute:
Civic Governance In The City Of London, Ontario
PLEASE NOTE: Due to a technical difficulty with the broadcast server approximately 2 minutes of the program was not archived.
Municipal politics in London exposes the absurdity of government overreach. City Hall launches a half-million-dollar training program for all employees on “respect” and “woman abuse,” prompted by a 1999 incident long past. Taxpayers foot the bill while basic civility should already be expected from those hired to serve the public. Spending public money to rehabilitate offenders on the public payroll amounts to rewarding bad behavior instead of simply firing those responsible.
Garbage collection policies reveal similar nonsense. New bag limits and weight restrictions punish conscientious residents who already recycle diligently, while ignoring core service improvements. Conscientious citizens struggle under arbitrary rules imposed during extended pickup delays, yet administrators justify restrictions by citing other cities—hardly a principled argument.
Global warming debates shift to economics, where carbon taxes emerge as the latest forced intervention. Proponents promise revenue-neutral shifts that somehow fund everything without consequences, but reality demonstrates otherwise. Artificially hiking energy prices shrinks economies and lowers living standards; no free lunch exists when governments manipulate markets through coercion disguised as “pricing signals.”
Healthcare discussions highlight dangers of single-payer systems. Private insurance faces legitimate criticism for claim denials, yet replacing it with government as both provider and referee guarantees even less accountability. Countries experimenting with fully socialized models now move toward privatization, while advocates here push in the opposite direction. Dental care proposals follow the same flawed logic—promising “free” services that inevitably ration access and inflate costs.
Marijuana prohibition persists as one of the most irrational policies on the books. Canadians consume at rates far exceeding global averages, even surpassing nations where the drug is tolerated. Criminalization creates black markets and inflated prices for a plant that grows virtually anywhere, while legalization with reasonable taxation offers a far more rational approach.
These issues all connect through one common thread: governments assuming control over individual choices, always with unintended consequences that justify yet more control. Recognizing this pattern remains just right.
As we reflect on our latest broadcast here at Just Right, we find ourselves once again challenging the prevailing narratives that dominate public discourse, from the so-called consensus on global warming to the insidious creep of racial quotas in municipal hiring. In our conversation, we welcomed Tom Harris from the Natural Resources Stewardship Project, whose insights underscored the complexity of climate science and the dangers of politicizing it. We delved into the notion that much of what passes for environmental urgency is not rooted in objective facts but in a self-referential system of alarmism, where dissenters are branded as deniers while evidence like solar activity influencing planetary temperatures—including the melting polar ice caps on Mars—goes unaddressed.
We also revisited our primer on the Left-Right political spectrum, emphasizing that true consistency demands accountability to principles, and we invite our listeners to hold us to that standard. Turning to local matters, we applauded City Councilor Paul Van Meerbergen for his stand against policies that prioritize skin color over merit in job applications, a practice we see as a backward step toward racism disguised as equity. Disappointingly, figures like Harold Usher dismissed these concerns, ignoring the inherent quotas that such initiatives imply. We addressed a follow-up from caller Marcel on pollution and the environment, affirming that no political faction favors environmental degradation; rather, solutions lie in technological advancement and a robust economy, not in fear-mongering.
Our discussion extended to critiques of Al Gore‘s An Inconvenient Truth, highlighting its flawed equation on technology and old ideas, and we explored how carbon dioxide—far from a pollutant—is essential to life, enhancing plant growth and oxygen production. Bans on technologies like incandescent bulbs or used oil disposal reveal a deeper agenda: government control over energy, paving the way for globalism and wealth redistribution under the guise of climate action. We proposed that conservatives convene unbiased hearings to air both sides of the debate, ensuring decisions are grounded in reason.
In wrapping up, we shared a fascinating tidbit on turtles exhibiting negligible senescence, a reminder that nature holds mysteries worth exploring. Ultimately, navigating these issues requires rejecting hysteria in favor of rational inquiry that is just right.
Note: Guest’s voice did not record on archive file, though was broadcast on-air. The silence on the audio file has been removed.
