233 – When to let slip the dogs of war

 Comments Off on 233 – When to let slip the dogs of war
Jan 192012
 

Ronald Reagan

 
 
 
 

Talk About Just Right – Your Feedback, Limericks, Suggestions
First Strike As Retaliation
Trigger Happy – Knowing When To Take The Military Offensive
Do You Mind? Or Does That Not Compute?

Post Script: The comments made about Fred Rogers turned out to be an urban myth. We should have verified the story first.

128 – Remembrance Day – How and why we lost the war

 Comments Off on 128 – Remembrance Day – How and why we lost the war
Nov 122009
 

Poppy

 
 
 
 

Forgettance Day – Forgetting The Causes Of War, While ‘Remembering’ Its Horrors
How And Why We Lost The First And Second World Wars
Sacrifice – Religion – Faith: The Roots Of War And The Enemies Of Freedom
Superstitious? You Won’t Be For Long. The End Of The World Is Coming — In 2012!

021 – Star Trek New Voyages / Fascism and frogs

 Comments Off on 021 – Star Trek New Voyages / Fascism and frogs
Sep 062007
 

Star Trek New Voyages

 

Stupid vacuous politics: Are you an air-head? Then Canadian politics could be for you!
Star Trek New Voyages: Where no television viewer has gone before!
Fascism and frogs
Why study war?
War protesters backing a bully

Your financial support is always appreciated:
❤️ PayPal

010 – Anti-idling / Freedom and risk / War – What is it good for? | Anthony Verberkmoes

 Comments Off on 010 – Anti-idling / Freedom and risk / War – What is it good for? | Anthony Verberkmoes
Jun 212007
 

War

 

In this edition of Just Right, we delved into the perennial surrender of freedom in exchange for an illusion of security, exposing how easily people trade their liberties for empty promises of safety. From London’s absurd anti-idling bylaws—designed to “educate” drivers with fines while exempting the very conditions where pollution matters most—to Canada’s no-fly list and post-9/11 restrictions that inconvenience innocents while achieving little against real threats, the pattern is clear: government overreach thrives on misplaced fears and misjudged risks.

We then turned to the Ontario provincial election circus, where Liberals and Progressive Conservatives alike peddle massive spending sprees—subsidies for “energy-efficient big cars,” billions for transit boondoggles, and John Tory’s push to fund religious schools at taxpayer expense—all while robbing Peter to pay Paul under the guise of compassion and progress. Add in school boards conjuring surpluses through creative accounting to avoid accountability for declining enrollments, and the fiscal irresponsibility becomes undeniable.

Guest Anthony Verberckmoes of Indymedia joined us to promote the Regional Social Forum, sparking a spirited debate on war, terrorism, and Western interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq—where one side sees self-defense against tyrannical regimes, and the other views imperial hypocrisy driven by oil and power.

Understanding these connections between personal freedom, government intrusion, electoral vote-buying, and the justifications for war is Just Right.

006 – Gas prices / Afghan war / Monarchy / Environmentalism

 Comments Off on 006 – Gas prices / Afghan war / Monarchy / Environmentalism
May 242007
 

Queen signs Constitution

 

On this broadcast of Just Right, we addressed several pressing issues that continue to reflect fundamental principles of economics, politics, and philosophy. We began with the perennial complaints about rising gas prices, exposing the hypocrisy of politicians who decry high prices while simultaneously advocating policies to reduce consumption. As we explained, prices reflect the immutable law of supply and demand—a natural equilibrium that politicians like Liberal MP Dan McTeague and Progressive Conservative proposals foolishly seek to manipulate through increased regulation or advance notice requirements. Such interventions only lead to shortages, rationing, and further distortions of the market.

We then turned to Canada’s mission in Afghanistan, supporting Prime Minister Harper’s commitment despite public weariness fueled by media narratives. With relatively low casualties compared to everyday risks at home, we argued that abandoning the mission prematurely would constitute defeat. Negotiating with the Taliban, as suggested by some, is absurd given their ideological intransigence.

The date also prompted reflection on our constitutional monarchy. Far from irrelevant, we contended that this institution, evolved since the Magna Carta, serves as a bulwark limiting government power and preserving individual rights—a superior safeguard compared to republics that too easily devolve into unchecked statism.

Finally, we delved deeply into the environmentalist movement, reading an prescient 1969 essay by Ayn Rand that unmasks its anti-industrial, anti-human essence. Environmentalism, we demonstrated, is not about genuine pollution control (a technological issue) but about imposing collectivist dictatorship under the guise of ecological crusade. A caller’s passionate defense of balance with nature highlighted the spiritual underpinnings of this ideology, yet underscored how it often justifies coercing others.

These discussions reaffirm that true progress lies in defending individual freedom and reason against collectivist assaults. Awareness of these connections is just right.