026 – Ontario election 2007

 Comments Off on 026 – Ontario election 2007
Oct 112007
 

Stress

The recent Ontario election delivers no shocks, with Liberals securing another majority amid record-low voter turnout. Faith-based funding emerges as the flashpoint, revealing deep divides: Liberals cling to a state monopoly that forces double payments on parents opting for private schools, while Conservatives peddle taxpayer-funded “choice” that contradicts true freedom. This debate echoes Ontario’s tangled history, where education roots in political control—from Simcoe’s 1791 fears of republican heresy to the 1807 District Public School Act subsidizing wages, and Strachan’s 1816 Common School Act demanding allegiance to the crown. Reformers and Tories battled over funding from clergy reserves, all aiming to suppress “Yankee” ideas and instill moral training from the Scriptures.

Public education’s monopoly prioritizes indoctrination over learning, as Khalil Ramal admits—it’s about “integrating” society into one vision. Shared values like freedom to disagree must unite us, yet the system stifles innovation, rewards union seniority over merit, and inflates costs even as enrollment drops. Complaints from the 1980s ring true today: political masters ignore classrooms, curricula bow to pressure not preferences, and diplomas lose meaning amid literacy gaps.

Michael Coren’s cynical Thanksgiving rant captures broader discontent—Canada as a “home on native land” plagued by unresolved claims, eroding freedoms via Human Rights Commissions, lenient justice for criminals, a flawed Charter empowering radicals, and a health care system ranked 30th globally. Abroad, respect fades as our warrior heritage withers under emasculation.

Federally, Harper’s drug war escalation promises mandatory sentences and millions for enforcement, prevention, and treatment, yet ignores failed prohibition’s lessons. Criminalizing substances empowers gangs, inflates profits tax-free, and confuses addiction with restraint of trade. Better to legalize, end welfare for abusers, and hold individuals accountable for actions, not possessions.

Workplace stress hits hardest in repetitive jobs, while Canada Post’s antiquated monopoly exemplifies government inefficiency—outdated machines, accidents galore, and static delivery amid urban growth.
In this landscape of monopolies and misplaced priorities, finding balance remains just right for true progress.

Transcript Donate

025 – Steve Holmes: NDP candidate for London-North-Centre – Ontario election 2007

 Comments Off on 025 – Steve Holmes: NDP candidate for London-North-Centre – Ontario election 2007
Oct 042007
 

025_Steve_Holmes_168x100 

In this pre-election dialogue, NDP candidate Steve Holmes joins us in studio to outline his party’s vision for Ontario, just days before the October 10 vote. Holmes, a long-time bus driver and union leader, shares his background in representing workers through the ATU 741 and London District Labor Council, emphasizing the NDP’s roots in labor advocacy. The conversation quickly turns to the interconnected planks of Howard Hampton’s platform, linking healthcare accessibility—including relisted services and dental care—to environmental initiatives like the Green Lights program, which promotes conservation and decentralized renewable energy sources such as wind and solar.

Discussions on energy reveal sharp contrasts, as Holmes invokes Adam Beck’s conservative-era push for public power at cost, while the flaws of government monopolies become evident in examples like inflated hydro bills burdened by transmission fees and debt charges. Economic philosophies clash over free trade, globalism, and the “race to the bottom,” with Holmes defending protections for workers’ rights and local economies against unchecked corporate profits. Labor issues dominate, exploring whether unions truly serve all workers or act as special interests, amid declining unionization and critiques of leaders like Sid Ryan venturing into unrelated political activism.

The referendum on mixed member proportional representation sparks debate on electoral fairness, highlighting the NDP’s support for a system that balances riding representation with party lists, potentially amplifying diverse voices despite risks to independents. Broader topics include crime’s roots in social inequities, the need for preventive education supports cut under Mike Harris, and unresolved Aboriginal land disputes in Caledonia and Ipperwash, blamed on federal delays. A caller challenges private education’s accessibility, underscoring tensions between choice and equity.

Throughout, audio clips from Star Trek and comedians illustrate themes of taxes, unions, and greed, though these external views do not reflect our own. As philosophies diverge on individualism versus collectivism, the exchange underscores why true fairness demands rejecting coercive policies in favor of freedom that’s just right.

Transcript Clips & Credits Donate

022 – Afghanistan: A sense of the place | Arthur Majoor

 Comments Off on 022 – Afghanistan: A sense of the place | Arthur Majoor
Sep 132007
 

Arthur Majoor

In the shadow of the sixth anniversary of 9/11, our discussion turns to Canada’s unexpected role in Afghanistan, a mission that defies the media’s narrow focus on combat. Joined by Sergeant Arthur Majoor, fresh from a six-month tour in Kandahar, the conversation reveals a landscape far removed from the alien desolation often portrayed. Mountains loom against a red desert, temperatures soar to the low 50s, yet adaptation becomes second nature amid air-conditioned bases and limited outdoor exertion.

The media’s obsession with battles obscures the true essence of our efforts: a seamless blend of security and reconstruction. Provincial Reconstruction Teams, bolstered by battle groups, enable projects that rebuild infrastructure without immediate Taliban sabotage. Afghanistan’s history unfolds as a tale of instability—from constitutional monarchy disrupted by 1970s droughts and factionalism, to Soviet invasion in 1979, Mujahideen resistance, civil wars, and Taliban tyranny that froze society under draconian rule. Ejected in 2001, the Taliban left a void now filled by ISAF’s multinational alliance of 38 nations, including Canada, committed through the UN-mandated Afghan Compact until 2011.

Progress manifests in small but profound ways: reclaiming irrigation ditches, building village schools and clinics, fostering community councils—including those for women—and training Afghan National Army battalions. Yet challenges persist, with 30 years of educational voids hindering skilled labor like engineers or mechanics. Canada’s $1.2 billion aid over a decade supports this, spurring local economies rather than flooding with foreign goods. Critics who demand withdrawal ignore the symbiotic tie between combat and development; pulling out prematurely risks undoing gains in a geopolitically volatile region bordering nuclear powers.

Humanitarianism aligns with our self-image as UN supporters and human rights advocates, countering Taliban ferocity against education and freedom. Villagers actively aid ISAF, exposing caches and informing on threats, proving local rejection of fear-based rule. As Canadians historically tackle immense challenges—from building the CPR to forging NATO—staying the course honors our values. In this pivotal endeavor, success demands persistence that hits just right.

Transcript Clips & Credits Donate

021 – Star Trek New Voyages / Fascism and frogs

 Comments Off on 021 – Star Trek New Voyages / Fascism and frogs
Sep 062007
 

Star Trek

In today’s episode of Just Right, the airwaves crackle with critiques of Canadian politics, drawing from Andrew Coyne’s blunt assessment in the National Post that our federal and provincial scenes embody sheer vacuity—Liberals peddling unattainable environmental targets and Conservatives abandoning policy altogether. Provincial elections in Ontario loom as tedious non-events, riddled with broken promises and regional squabbles, while energy debates expose the nonsense of conservation fantasies versus nuclear sense, as David Frum highlights the waste in deferring to ignorant fears.

The discussion shifts to the enduring allure of Star Trek, where amateur productions at newvoyages.com revive the original series with superior effects but amateur acting, featuring veterans like Walter Koenig. Beyond gadgets, Star Trek serves as a moral barometer, exploring philosophy through dramatic devices like the prime directive—echoing laissez-faire non-interference—and tackling racism, individual rights, and human nature in ways realism cannot.

Building on last week’s socialism segment, fascism emerges as the flip side, illustrated by the frog parable: gradual heat increases unnoticed until boiling, mirroring Ontario’s creeping state controls over private property, from smoking bans to rent controls and pay equity laws. These policies, though labeled liberal or conservative, embody fascist doctrine where control equals ownership, eroding freedoms without outright nationalization.

Finally, Victor Davis Hanson’s call to study war underscores its utilitarian role in ending tyrannies, while Ayn Rand pins wars on statism’s institutionalized violence, contrasting with capitalism’s historic peace from 1815 to 1914. As pressures mount in our mixed economy, recognizing these dynamics keeps perspectives just right.

Transcript Donate

020 – Health care? / Hitler was a socialist

 Comments Off on 020 – Health care? / Hitler was a socialist
Aug 302007
 

Machine that goes Bing! 

Continuing our critique of Canada’s socialized health care system, we feature compelling insights from Dr. Tom Dorman, a physician who fled both the British and Canadian systems. Dorman rightly defines true insurance as voluntary asset protection against catastrophe—not the compulsory, taxpayer-funded scheme masquerading as “health insurance” today. Mandatory coverage, he argues, reduces patients to mere chattels, valued only until treatment becomes uneconomical, much like cattle on a farm.

The incoming CMA president, Brian Day, claims to inject “market principles” into the public system while insisting full privatization is impossible. This contradiction exposes a deeper flaw: genuine markets thrive on voluntary exchange, not coerced taxation. Day’s approach merely rearranges the deck chairs on a sinking collectivist ship.

Shifting to another form of taxpayer plunder, arts organizations lobby politicians for forced funding, equating their subsidies to health care entitlements. John Tory enthusiastically obliges, promising multi-year commitments and councils to “nourish” culture. Yet culture flourishes through voluntary support, not government coercion. The Freedom Party correctly condemns this as morally repugnant—theft disguised as benevolence.

Finally, we examine Nazism’s collectivist roots. Adolf Hitler’s regime built a popular welfare state financed by plundering Jews and conquered nations. The National Socialist German Workers’ Party delivered “benefits” through altruism and sacrifice for the collective—principles echoing modern statism. Hitler’s vaunted Aryan superiority rested not on intellect or strength, but on willingness to self-sacrifice for the community.

Recognizing collectivism’s destructive patterns in health care, arts funding, and historical tyranny offers the perspective that is just right.

Transcript Donate

019 – How stupid people are wrecking politics

 Comments Off on 019 – How stupid people are wrecking politics
Aug 232007
 

When did ignorance become a point of view?

Canada’s health care system faces intense scrutiny as private alternatives challenge the government monopoly. A groundbreaking private emergency facility in Vancouver operates efficiently, with no wait times, cheerful staff, and immediate treatment—for those willing to pay directly. Founded by Dr. Mark Godley, this center highlights the advantages of private motivation and flat management, free from bureaucratic hierarchies that plague the public system.

The Canadian Medical Association surprises many by advocating private insurance and contracting out services when public timelines fail. Yet politicians like John Tory muddy the waters, promising “private” clinics that still forbid direct payment, extending the public crisis rather than resolving it. True private care requires private payment—anything else remains government-controlled, no matter the label.

Michael Moore’s Sicko praised universal systems, but reality shows the opposite: restricted choices, artificial doctor shortages from past cost-cutting decisions, and infinite demand for “free” services. The internet draws fire for amplifying uninformed opinions, yet it merely reveals what public discourse has always been—often shallow and misguided.

Deeper still lies the issue of freedom itself. Canadians rarely demand liberty from taxes, regulations, or social engineering. As philosopher John Macmurray observes, people fear freedom more than they crave it, choosing security and frustrating their own potential. History proves that valuing freedom brings both freedom and security—while prioritizing security risks losing both.
In exploring these contradictions, from health care to politics, we find the balance just right.

Transcript Donate

018 – Faith Vs. Reason In Politics | Paul McKeever

 Comments Off on 018 – Faith Vs. Reason In Politics | Paul McKeever
Aug 162007
 

Paul McKeever 

Paul McKeever, leader of the Freedom Party of Ontario, joins the discussion to explore a fundamental question facing Western society: should public policy rest on faith, consensus, or reason?
The West has long thrived by keeping religious belief separate from lawmaking. Historical figures like Jesus, with “render unto Caesar,” and Lord Acton drew clear lines between earthly governance and spiritual matters. Yet today, faith increasingly influences political decisions, from openly religious parties to policies inspired by unquestioned convictions rather than evidence.

Global warming illustrates this danger vividly. Graphs spanning millennia show temperature rises preceding CO2 increases by centuries, driven by natural solar and oceanic cycles—yet political narratives reverse this causality to push agendas. Environmentalism often adopts apocalyptic tones reminiscent of religious prophecy, while socialism echoes faith-based redistribution without regard for individual rights or reality.

In Ontario, proposals for faith-based school funding highlight the risk. Extending taxpayer dollars to religious education invites government oversight that could erode freedoms on both sides—either indoctrinating irrationality or watering down beliefs under state regulation. True separation demands private funding, leaving parents free to choose while keeping governance grounded in observable facts.

Consensus and appeals to authority fare no better, as they sideline independent thought. Superstitions, whether about crop planting or public policy, lead to fanaticism when elevated to conviction. Reason alone—logic applied to physical evidence—offers a reliable guide for human flourishing and freedom.

Only through reason do we navigate these challenges in a way that is just right.

Transcript Clips & Credits Donate