Just Right… with Bob Metz and Robert Vaughan

933 – Eye witness—to a bloodless assassination?

Comments Off

Oct 082025

“Don’t believe your own lying eyes,” has been a common response to visual ‘evidence’ used to create a narrative that simply doesn’t make sense. If ever there was a test of this bromide, it is the growing number of speculative accounts and ‘conspiracy theories’ surrounding the Charlie Kirk assassination.

Currently, the most alarming observation to surface is the reported lack of blood at the crime scene, something quite inconsistent with the visuals of blood seen streaming profusely from the neck of Charlie Kirk at the moment of his being shot. This has been observed and commented on by a variety of very different bloggers and podcasters, each with his/her own unique perspective and interpretation of what is being witnessed.

In this age of eye witness accounts, one must be extraordinarily cautious about what is accepted as the truth; discernment is the rule.

Given that revelations of past assassinations in American history continue to be released decades following the events themselves, it shouldn’t be surprising that the Kirk assassination has been viewed with a skepticism drawn from a deep distrust of those providing the official narratives.

Perhaps the most frustrating conclusion to draw from all of this is that when it comes to establishing an assassination narrative about Charlie Kirk that is Just Right, we might have to wait another six or more decades before something resembling the ‘truth’ surfaces.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

932 – Losers Lefting it—by just winging it

Comments Off

Oct 012025

One reason that the political polarity remains unseen by so many is because when it comes to Left and Right, most people are just winging it.

In fact, they have been ‘winging’ it for so long that they are at last coming to realize that each political wing is not so different from the other. U.S. General Michael Flynn has called on Americans to stop playing “this political two-party game” which, of course, was a sarcastic reference to what has been called a ‘Uniparty.’

But the only way to stop playing the ‘Uniparty’ game is to stop ‘winging it’ in the political arena. What is required is a two party polarity, not party wings. That’s because Left ‘wing’ and Right ‘wing’ are not so different from each other. Instead of representing individual rights and justice, each ‘wing’ represents a different interest group.

Traditionally, Left-wing groups restrict economic choices, limit trade and monopolize labor, while Right-wing groups restrict personal choices, control trade, and monopolize business. Those who claim to be ‘middle-of-the-road’ simply do both, and the ‘road’ all of them are on leads directly to the polarity of the Left. Continue reading »

931 – Turning Right—by awakening to the Left

Comments Off

Sep 242025

The Left is in a frenzy trying to associate the assassination of Charlie Kirk with the Right, an impossibility given the evidence. But facts and evidence have never mattered to those on the Left.

Finding himself in the middle of the frenzy, late-night show host Jimmy Kimmel was briefly suspended by ABC due to his political commentary (masquerading as comedy) claiming that Kirk was assassinated by the MAGA Right. Unfortunately for Kimmel, there was no evidence to justify this and a mountain of confirmed evidence pointing to the Left.

Attempting to portray the Left as the side against violence, many are now trying to talk ‘unity’ and walk back some of the hateful Leftist reactions to Kirk’s assassination, including Barack Hussein Obama.

In his recent fake condemnation of those who support the violence, he announced: “Let the record say that on both sides undoubtedly there are people who are extremists and who say things that are contrary to what I believe are America’s core values.” Continue reading »

930 – The Charlie Kirk turning point—from ballots to bullets

Comments Off

Sep 172025

Last week’s assassination of Charlie Kirk sent a shock wave across the world that exposed the political polarities of Left and Right on a scale never before experienced.

An American political activist on the Right, Kirk founded the conservative organization Turning Point USA and was its executive director until his untimely demise on the Utah Valley University campus on September 10.

While the tragedy of Charlie Kirk’s murder is its own horror story, a greater horror story has been the reaction of those on the Left who have celebrated his murder with calls for even more murders, including those of Kirk’s wife and children.

This has presented those on the Right with a moral dilemma: how to oppose the Left without having to resort to violence. Unlike the Right, the Left does not honor the ballot box; it worships the bullet. Continue reading »

929 – Anti-capitalists—lazy envious losers

Comments Off

Sep 102025

If calling anti-capitalists lazy envious losers sounds a bit harsh, the reality is that these descriptions are nowhere near harsh enough.

You have to hear it for yourself to understand why, and thanks to Patrick Bet-David’s August 31 Jubilee production, “One Capitalist versus 20 Anti-Capitalists,” you can. It has stirred a storm of controversy by exposing what anti-capitalists think and say – in their own words – that make them often sound as if they have yet to emerge from the womb.

“It’s such a horrible dystopian world to live in if someone has to work just to survive,” emotionally protested one participant. Another declared that “life liberty and the pursuit of happiness shouldn’t have to be earned. We just want to exist.”

Of course, the reality is that they “just want to exist” at the expense of others, who never even once are considered in their deranged ideals. In justifying their hatred of capitalism, the ‘anti-capitalists’ all shared a common fear, expressed as “either I work or I die.” Continue reading »

928 – Shooting blind—at shooter motives

Comments Off

Sep 032025

Given the alarming number of recent mass shootings, have we been shooting blind in our own analysis of these shooters’ motives?

In attempting to zero in on the underlying cause of these once unheard-of events, one is faced with an overwhelming array of symptoms, explanations and suggested solutions.

In addition to the mass shootings at religious functions and institutions themselves, these include: mental health disorders; gender dysphoria; anti-depressant drugs; SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors); guns and weapons; law enforcement; ‘safety’ laws and regulations; sexual dysfunctions; cognitive dysfunctions; atheism; Covid experimental gene therapies; Christianity; private property rights; the right to self defense; government disinformation and misinformation; medical malpractice and disinformation; thought disorders of faulty thinking; castle laws; state protection rackets; anarcho-tyranny; the right to bear arms.

While many of these concerns may seem unrelated, when one steps back for the ‘big picture’ view, what is particularly alarming is how so-called ‘big pharma’ in conjunction with intelligence agencies seem to have played a central role in the tragedies – in particular with regard to the use of drugs classified as SSRIs. Continue reading »

927 – When objective isn’t—there’s Objectivism

Comments Off

Aug 272025

Sad to say, the vast majority of people do not take philosophy seriously, even though they are helplessly in its grip. It is understandable that with with all of the competing ideologies and perspectives on the nature and purpose of human life, philosophy is seen by many simply as another religion without the element of deity – a subjective secular belief system.

Enter philosopher-novelist Ayn Rand, whose philosophy of Objectivism has a name that specifically refutes the subjective, and who since having arrived on America’s philosophical frontier, established a reputation unlike that of any other philosopher. She self-identified as being on the Right, which she associated with freedom and capitalism.

But there are many others who self-identify as being on the Right, who completely reject Ayn Rand’s philosophy, not because of its principles which they rarely mention, but because of its messenger.

“Ayn Rand is a modernist atheist radical individualist; what about that is conservative?” asked the Daily Wire’s Michael Knowles on his April 4 podcast during which he ranked the greatest philosophers. Continue reading »