Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 58:51 — 67.5MB) | Embed
“Life Is Terrible, But Such Small Portions”
Being Skeptical On Global Warming
“Caveman Logic” = University Epistemology
Getting It Right – Arguing For Capitalism, Not Against It
TV Show Updates – Castle, Terminator, Dollhouse, Chuck – Plus: The Unusuals
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 57:22 — 65.8MB) | Embed
Board Of Control – No Longer Controlled By Voters
Just Academic? – Feminism Vs Academia
Save Local TV – Abolish The C.R.T.C.
Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged – Prophesy? Or Simply Causality?
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 54:22 — 62.4MB) | Embed
Just Right: The 100th Hour
Bending Rules Vs Unchangeable Principles
Rules – Laws – Principles – Truths
What Can One Person Do? – To Make A Difference For Freedom, Not Against It
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 56:51 — 65.2MB) | Embed
Happiness And Self Esteem
The Cult of Zero Worship
Footprint vs Bootprint
George Carlin Says ‘The Planet Is Fine’
Polls expose a curious public confusion between fact and fiction. Many in Britain insist Sherlock Holmes walked the streets of London as flesh and blood, while dismissing Winston Churchill as mere legend. Such blurring of reality and myth reveals how powerfully stories shape perception long after events fade.
We see the same dynamic play out in contemporary policy debates. Canadians celebrate an MRI scan that costs only a parking fee after seven months of waiting, as if this represents some triumph rather than a rationed system’s quiet cruelty. The satisfaction with mediocrity masks the invisible costs borne by others denied timely care.
Political figures receive similar mythic treatment. John Tory garners praise as the ideal conservative leader despite a record of equivocation and electoral failure. Talk of principles clashes with actions that mirror liberal instincts, leaving voters with no clear choice.
Meanwhile, advocates for human rights commissions invoke ‘hatred kills’ to justify speech restrictions, citing tragic cases while omitting inconvenient details like the ideological motives behind certain crimes. The impulse to control expression under the guise of protection echoes ancient myths used to maintain power.
Ideas endure far longer than the individuals or events that spawn them, whether drawn from ancient legends or modern political narratives. Distinguishing the symbolic from the factual remains essential in every age. Only in this way do we discover what is Just Right.
Reality anchors thinking far more securely than chasing abstract truth ever could. Philosophers from Plato onward demonstrate how easily fixed doctrines detach from evidence, producing rigid positions that ignore contradictory facts. John Macmurray’s insight captures this perfectly: real thought welcomes revision as experience demands it.
Government overreach reveals similar unreality in public debates. Taser controversies fixate on the device’s “safety” rather than proper use and policy. Car regulations escalate the pattern—bans on smoking with children, mandatory seatbelts, even airbag mandates that carry hidden lethal risks in certain crashes. Statistics show airbags save lives yet also claim others, particularly when deployed improperly. Mandating such devices overrides personal choice under the guise of protection.
Pope Benedict’s encyclical challenges modern Christianity’s emphasis on individual salvation, contrasting it with earlier communal approaches. This critique echoes collectivist themes that downplay independent reason. Hope, too, comes under scrutiny—when it substitutes for action, it paralyzes rather than empowers.
Japan’s robotics surge offers a forward-looking contrast, with Toyota and Honda developing humanoid machines for everyday assistance. These innovations highlight economic and technological shifts worth watching closely.
Exploring these intersections of philosophy, policy, and progress proves consistently illuminating and just right.
Philosophy remains the unseen foundation beneath every decision, conflict, and cultural trend, yet countless individuals dismiss it as abstract, irrelevant, or even dangerous. Avoidance often stems from its association with defeat—witness how athletes and politicians turn “philosophical” only after losing—or from the proliferation of destructive ideologies that overshadow the valid ones.
Origins trace back to ancient Greece, where Socrates pioneered dialectic, Plato championed timeless ideals in a dualistic reality, and Aristotle grounded forms within the material world, embracing objective existence and the golden mean. Modern thought finds its sharpest defender in Ayn Rand’s Objectivism, which elevates reason and reality above all. Her analogy of the mind as a computer proves particularly illuminating: garbage in, garbage out. Default on conscious programming, and random or alien ideas seize control, manifesting as unpredictable emotions.
Contemporary trends fare poorly under scrutiny. Pragmatism discards fixed standards for fleeting practicality. Linguistic analysis reduces truth to arbitrary words. Existentialism plunges into nihilistic despair, portraying a hostile universe devoid of purpose.
True freedom emerges not from anarchy’s chaotic faith in voluntary order—which crumbles without enforcement—but from the absence of coercion, safeguarded by objective laws and limited government. Anarchy invites gang warfare; freedom demands protection of individual rights.
These distinctions clarify why philosophy cannot be ignored—it programs the subconscious and directs human action. Approaching these ideas with reason and evidence feels just right.
