“Regime change has a history of destructive regimes being replaced by better ones,” argues Dinesh D’Souza in anticipation of Iran’s liberation. And on that count, he has concluded that “the only people mourning regime change in Iran are the Democrats, the mullahs, and Tucker Carlson.”
And while all eyes are focused on Iran, few are aware of other regime changes occurring in Canada, most notably in the provinces of British Columbia and Alberta.
With the recent announcement by Dallas Brodie (member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia representing the electoral district of Vancouver-Quilchena) that the Canadian federal government “has granted aboriginal title over all of the lower mainland to the Musqueamin Indian Band whose population is a mere 1250 band members,” the alarm was sounded that a regime change is taking place without anyone’s knowledge or consent.
Meanwhile, Albertans are considering their own potential regime change in the form of separating from the country. In a March 5 debate between Law Professor Bruce Pardy (Executive Director of Rights Probe) and Jason Kenney (18th premier of Alberta and past federal politician), it soon became clear why Albertans would be replacing a destructive regime with a better one by separating from Canada.
Indeed, against the backdrop of history, it appears that regime change is a perpetual phenomenon, whereas regime stability is a relative rarity.
However, it can never be denied that when a ‘better’ regime replaces a previous one, that the new regime represents a move from Left to Right, from tyranny and central control towards freedom and individualism.
Thus when Bruce Pardy projected his vision of Alberta as a country that has at its roots the principles of Western civilization – with no regard to status or race and in which all are treated equally before and under the law – he was describing a country that sounds Just Right to us.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.