
It’s bad enough when those on the Right publicly exhibit internal ideological conflicts; it’s even worse when those conflicts become personal.
For example, says Ben Shapiro: “The fragmentation of the political right is caused purposely by a splinter faction led by Nick Fuentes. They’re white supremacists; they hate women, Jews, Christians, brown people, blacks, America’s foreign policy and constitution, and they admire Hitler and Stalin,” and “Tucker Carlson is an intellectual coward, a dishonest interlocutor, and a terrible friend.”
Says Mark Levin: “Tucker is a racist so, no, I don’t debate the Klan and I don’t debate Nazis.”
Says Tucker Carlson: “Mark Levin is full of hate. (He supports) killing kids because you don’t like their parents. He is describing blood guilt.”
You get the general idea – not exactly inspiring displays of reasoned debate or clearly defined principles. And these are but a few examples.
The concern has been raised as to whether or not the various conflicts between recognized voices of the ‘Right’ will cause a fragmentation on the Right serious enough to compromise the MAGA movement and its resistance to the Left.
Whether or not these conflicts will evolve from a minor right wing fragmentation to another major right wing stagnation is something impossible to predict.
But to suggest that these disagreements are being aired and debated in a way that is Just Right depends on whether one takes them seriously or just as comedic entertainment.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal






