Dec 032022
 

Note: YouTube would not permit us to post this conversation to our channel.

Dr. Laura Braden became outspoken in 2021 when the governments of PEI and Canada began rolling out experimental mRNA gene therapy. She knew as a molecular immunologist that these “vaccines” would result in the death of children. Unfortunately, she was correct.

As part of her daily routine working for a private aquaculture company, she would perform daily PCR tests and knew that the state’s narrative of there being high “cases” of COVID-19 was a fabrication. The data they were presenting was false. Worse was their immoral solution of lockdowns, coerced “vaccinations,” and violations of individual rights.

Fired from her position just two weeks after advocating for the use of ivermectin she joined Taking Back Our Freedoms (tbof.ca), a Canadian group dedicated to repealing all COVID-19 mandates. Their mission: “To engage, educate, and empower Canadians to become catalysts for challenging their institutions, holding their representatives personally accountable, and reclaiming their inalienable rights and freedoms.”

She has also become instrumental in organizing the National Citizens Inquiry (nationalcitizensinquiry.ca), an initiative launched in November 2022 by former Leader of the Official Opposition and Member of Parliament, Preston Manning. The Inquiry will conduct a series of open forums to hear testimony from Canadians impacted by their governments’ responses to COVID-19, and issue a report with recommendations “ensuring that any future national crises are better managed, harms mitigated, and trust in public institutions upheld.”

Her loss to the field of science is a gain for Canadians trying to understand how their medical and governmental institutions failed them and how those responsible for the failures can be held to account for their actions.

Dr. Braden joins Robert Vaughan to discuss her dismissal, the truth behind governments’ response to the “pandemic,” and her efforts to seek justice for those harmed by the system.

The conversation is also available on BitChute and Odysee.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Dec 012022
 


In an effort to describe and explain the madness forcing various versions of a “green agenda” upon us, our guest Salim Mansur recently found himself drawn to a series of essays originally compiled in Ayn Rand’s 1971 book “The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution.” (re-released in 1999 as “Return of the Primitive” with additional essays by Peter Schwartz on the enduring legacy of the Left.)

“There is something fundamentally primitive in this malady, this profound sickness that has overtaken Western man,” laments Salim. “It was astounding. Everything that Rand wrote about is what we’re living through. This is not a new debate.”

Drawing upon Rand’s symbolic comparison of the Greek gods Apollo and Dionysus with the Right and Left respectively, Salim is led unavoidably to the conclusion that the making of civilizations is an individual undertaking, not a collective one.

In the light of that reality, the collectivist wave now enveloping the West can itself be understood to be both the cause and symptom of civilization’s collapse. Continue reading »

Nov 242022
 


The Donald Trump who announced his 2024 bid for the American presidency on November 15 was not the same Donald Trump running for office in 2016 or 2020. Far more critically aware of his hostile political environment and of the great dangers ahead, Trump’s Mar-a-Lago speech included some very cryptic and disturbing remarks that seemed to escape the notice of most observers.

Citing “the most corrupt forces and entrenched interests imaginable,” Trump warned “this is not a task for a politician or a conventional candidate,” calling upon the American people themselves to do the job. “I am your voice,” Trump vowed.

With the issue of the previous stolen election central to the litany of politically manufactured crises’ from Covid to climate change, Trump’s platform was loudly cheered as it struck at the heart of electoral integrity. Among measures called for were voter ID, same day voting, paper ballots only, and ensuring all votes are counted by election night.

But all electoral fanfare was overshadowed by a great sense of urgency and foreboding that transcended mere electoral considerations. “You can’t stay quiet any longer” pleaded Trump. “The only force strong enough to defeat the corruption is you the American people.”

Even as he vowed to “unleash liberty for generations yet to come,” Trump’s vision of a brighter future was attached to a dire warning of a darker present. “The citizens of our country have not yet realized the full extent and gravity of the pain our nation is going through, and the total effect of the suffering is just starting to take hold. By 2024 it will sadly be much worse.”

And then, in as cryptic and haunting a message as anyone would ever expect to hear from the president of the United States, Trump announced that by 2024 he would be relying on a nation awakened by its deep suffering. By then, he explained, “everyone will agree with us,” making it “much easier for us to do what has to be done.”

One thing is certain. Trump’s warning deeply suggests that it will no longer be “politics as usual.” The only question now remaining is whether or not doing “what has to be done” will turn out to be Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Nov 172022
 


With calls to “flatten the curve” used to justify the first lock-downs and mandated mRNA injections back in 2020-21, it was immediately clear that the patient requiring a cure was the health care system itself.

In response to recent revelations and admissions that the public was lied to, our guest Dr Roger Hodkinson warns that we have reached a “devastating moment for medicine.” He has also accused the state-monopolized socialized health care system of being a “closed shop” that promotes “state sanctioned murder.”

The reality is that socialized health care is only capable of flat-“lining” a health care system, not of “flattening” any demand curve for its services. Unless of course, that demand curve is being flattened by killing the demand itself – quite literally.

In the wake of devastating and unprecedented death rates and adverse reactions to the injections, it appears that this may have been the intended plan all along. Flatten the curve by flat-lining the patients. If so, it is tragically ironic that when officials originally told us they would “flatten the curve” they were Just Right, even though how they were doing it was just wrong.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Nov 102022
 


Faced with the incredible scale of crimes against humanity related to the mandated rollouts of “Covid vaccines,” our guest Dr Roger Hodkinson attracted international attention after having cited global statistics that paint a horrific picture. At least twenty million have died directly due to the injections, while another two billion suffered severe adverse reactions.

“I’m calling it the Big Kill. We’ve seen the biggest kill ever in medicine’s history,” says Dr Hodkinson. “And it’s the physicians, not just the politicians, who are principally culpable because they have allowed government’s jackboots to influence how they manage their patients – which has never ever happened before.”

In the midst of this reality, and on the heels of various official admissions that producers and distributors of the injections knew about the dangers all along, calls for “amnesty” are surfacing from those who granted no such considerations while promoting the lies.

“Absolutely not. I’m full of vengeance. I’m vengeful. It’s not a time to say I’m sorry. Let’s put these bastards in jail!”

Adapted from a much broader conversation available on Just Right’s video channels, on today’s broadcast Dr Hodkinson calls upon the principles of “First do no harm” and “informed consent” as necessary fundamentals to any ethical practice of medicine.

Upon further consideration, it seems to us that applying the principles of “First do no harm” and “informed consent” to the political arena may prove to be Just Right for what ails the body politic as well.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

783 – Electoral shock—the fallout of political polarity

 Comments Off on 783 – Electoral shock—the fallout of political polarity
Nov 032022
 


With the midterms on its doorstep, America appears poised for an electoral shock. It is a shock that some are trying to avoid by calling for an end to the “political polarization” that could split the nation.

But this is neither possible, nor desirable. The polarization of ideas is the whole point of politics, without which it is impossible to clearly distinguish one choice from the other. It is a lack of polarization that has led to the persistent Leftward drift towards tyranny.

The term “polar opposite” describes the “extreme” nature of polarity, such as north and south, positive and negative, and of course, Left and Right. Politically, the Left represents collectivism and tyranny; the Right represents its opposite: individualism and freedom.

Unfortunately, this polar distinction has been intentionally hidden. By falsely and incorrectly associating the Leftist ideology of fascism and its variants with the Right, the Left has successfully handicapped those on the Right from being able to effectively distance themselves from the Left.

Consequently, many have dismissed the Left-Right political labels entirely, correctly viewing them as a useless means of distinction. But even so, these labels still carry great power as the chief means of ideological identity within the political arena. It is ironic that the very people immobilized by the mere suggestion of being labeled right wing are among those declaring political labels to be useless.

It is clear that America’s Left is in a panic. Between Hillary Clinton’s calls to “crush the coup,” and bizarre media assertions that an “attack” on Paul Pelosi is an example of “political violence” resulting from “hyper-partisanship and divisive political rhetoric,” it appears that America’s increased polarization is something the Left fears greatly.

Understanding that the Left represents tyranny and the Right represent freedom is the real polarity and truth that the Left seeks to hide in its fog of indistinguishable labels. They know that the failure to polarize issues will result in a failure to distinguish between not only Left and Right, but between good and evil, life and death.

Thankfully, given America’s currently polarized condition, the probability that Americans will vote for candidates that are Just Right is higher than ever, raising hopes that a red wave can slow and reverse America’s drift toward tyranny.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

782 – Unconscionable—the death of medical ethics

 Comments Off on 782 – Unconscionable—the death of medical ethics
Oct 272022
 


“Unconscionable” is the most succinct way to describe the past and current actions of Canada’s health care monopolists. From restricting cancer treatments to forcing deadly Covid protocols and vaccine mandates, their every decision has been destructive to the broader health of Canadians, while explicitly serving political interests.

The unconscionable and willful blindness of the medical and political establishment expressed towards the injured and dead victims of their Covid agenda merely adds insult to injury. Among the dead are an astonishing number of young doctors who have passed away not long after having received a mandated “vaccine.”

As if that wasn’t bad enough, evidence has surfaced that health officials have been intentionally deleting the public records of the doctor deaths. And even more astonishingly, it appears that this practice of deleting any evidence of “vaccine” harm is now being applied to members of the general public as well.

From the beginning of the “vaccine” rollout to this day, the health care establishment abandoned the principle of providing “informed consent” as a fundamental medical ethic with regard to adults. Then unconscionably it instituted an unprecedented policy of allowing minors to “consent” to an injection without the knowledge of the parent or guardian. Given that minors lack the legal capacity to consent, this is akin to statutory rape and should be treated in the same light.

But when it comes to ever setting things Just Right again, the unconscionable and unethical medical practices so readily adopted today suggest that we’ve got a long wait ahead of us.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal