Category: Audio | Page 2 | Just Right Media

929 – Anti-capitalists—lazy envious losers

Comments Off

Sep 102025

If calling anti-capitalists lazy envious losers sounds a bit harsh, the reality is that these descriptions are nowhere near harsh enough.

You have to hear it for yourself to understand why, and thanks to Patrick Bet-David’s August 31 Jubilee production, “One Capitalist versus 20 Anti-Capitalists,” you can. It has stirred a storm of controversy by exposing what anti-capitalists think and say – in their own words – that make them often sound as if they have yet to emerge from the womb.

“It’s such a horrible dystopian world to live in if someone has to work just to survive,” emotionally protested one participant. Another declared that “life liberty and the pursuit of happiness shouldn’t have to be earned. We just want to exist.”

Of course, the reality is that they “just want to exist” at the expense of others, who never even once are considered in their deranged ideals. In justifying their hatred of capitalism, the ‘anti-capitalists’ all shared a common fear, expressed as “either I work or I die.” Continue reading »

928 – Shooting blind—at shooter motives

Comments Off

Sep 032025

Given the alarming number of recent mass shootings, have we been shooting blind in our own analysis of these shooters’ motives?

In attempting to zero in on the underlying cause of these once unheard-of events, one is faced with an overwhelming array of symptoms, explanations and suggested solutions.

In addition to the mass shootings at religious functions and institutions themselves, these include: mental health disorders; gender dysphoria; anti-depressant drugs; SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors); guns and weapons; law enforcement; ‘safety’ laws and regulations; sexual dysfunctions; cognitive dysfunctions; atheism; Covid experimental gene therapies; Christianity; private property rights; the right to self defense; government disinformation and misinformation; medical malpractice and disinformation; thought disorders of faulty thinking; castle laws; state protection rackets; anarcho-tyranny; the right to bear arms.

While many of these concerns may seem unrelated, when one steps back for the ‘big picture’ view, what is particularly alarming is how so-called ‘big pharma’ in conjunction with intelligence agencies seem to have played a central role in the tragedies – in particular with regard to the use of drugs classified as SSRIs. Continue reading »

927 – When objective isn’t—there’s Objectivism

Comments Off

Aug 272025

Sad to say, the vast majority of people do not take philosophy seriously, even though they are helplessly in its grip. It is understandable that with with all of the competing ideologies and perspectives on the nature and purpose of human life, philosophy is seen by many simply as another religion without the element of deity – a subjective secular belief system.

Enter philosopher-novelist Ayn Rand, whose philosophy of Objectivism has a name that specifically refutes the subjective, and who since having arrived on America’s philosophical frontier, established a reputation unlike that of any other philosopher. She self-identified as being on the Right, which she associated with freedom and capitalism.

But there are many others who self-identify as being on the Right, who completely reject Ayn Rand’s philosophy, not because of its principles which they rarely mention, but because of its messenger.

“Ayn Rand is a modernist atheist radical individualist; what about that is conservative?” asked the Daily Wire’s Michael Knowles on his April 4 podcast during which he ranked the greatest philosophers. Continue reading »

926 – Official Dumb-and the incompetence of state regulation

Comments Off

Aug 202025

The ridiculous fine of $28,870.50 levied against Nova Scotia resident Jeff Evely is a classic example of officialdom hard at work.

The Cambridge English Dictionary defines ‘officialdom’ as a noun referring to “the people who have a position of authority, especially in government, often when they are preventing or slowing you from doing something.”

In this case, officialdom is preventing people from taking a walk in the woods on their own property – revealing officialdom to be official dumb. Perusing a handful of on-line dictionaries, the word ‘dumb’ is described as: “lacking the power of speech; used of animals and inanimate objects; lacking intelligence or good judgment; stupid; dull-witted.”

All of these terms seem to apply to the likes of Newfoundland’s premier John Hogan and New Brunswick’s premier Tim Houston whose continually changing justifications for the draconian fines and penalties border on the insane: Continue reading »

925 – The Majority Rule: The majority is never Right

Comments Off

Aug 132025

Earlier in democracy’s history, its operative principle was not considered to be ‘majority rule,’ but instead, ‘majority government.’ This expressed the idea that only those who had reached the ‘age of majority’ should be eligible to vote and participate in government. It was an age at which a person became a self-responsible adult, capable of exercising informed consent, and otherwise could be held responsible for his/ her actions.

In a free democracy, no one ‘rules’ anyone else. But in a democracy based on ‘majority rule,’ that principle no longer holds true.

The Left views ‘democracy’ as a system of ‘majority rule’ under which the winning group is given the legal authority to rule over other groups and individuals, all justified on the grounds of having achieved some kind of ‘majority.’

The Right views democracy as a system of governance in which no one can ‘vote’ to infringe upon anyone else’s right to Life Liberty and Property. Voting is restricted to matters of governance (justice, military, police, etc.) outside of the private sphere of activity. This would constitute majority government as opposed to majority rule. Continue reading »

924 – Jean therapy—against the WOKE virus

Comments Off

Aug 062025

Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle blue jeans ad has proven to be a ‘jean therapy’ against the WOKE virus. But is it a cure?

The literally insane reactions to the ad by a myriad of women saying that they are objecting to ‘eugenics’ was both laughable and tragic. Calling upon vague and contrived associations with Hitler, their objections were justified using terms and arguments like the following:

“Sweeney has great genes; she’s a Nazi; she’s fascist; she’s a racist; she owns a German shepherd as her dog whistle; her initials spell ‘SS’; she has white skin, blue eyes and blue jeans; American Eagle is promoting fascist propaganda, Christian nationalism and white supremacy; Sweeney is Hitler’s wet dream; cotton jeans are racist; American Eagle is reviving the Third Reich; Sweeney represents white supremacist patriarchy capitalistic beauty standards; the ads portray fascist aesthetics; the script is bigoted BS,” and much much more. Continue reading »

923 – The Obama bombshell—and the call for accountability

Comments Off

Jul 302025

In the wake of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s bombshell report regarding former U.S. President Barrack Hussein Obama’s traitorous actions against the United States of America and its citizens, there are many voices calling for some kind of serious and real accountability. But in the absence of any such accountability over past political actions that were demonstrably harmful and destructive to the lives of Americans, it is understandable that many remain skeptical about such a possibility.

But the elusiveness of achieving ‘accountability’ in government may be the consequence of deeper forces beyond any individual’s direct control. Unfortunately, in a democracy governed with the ‘consent of the governed,’ the difficulty in holding individual politicians ‘accountable’ for their political actions is an unavoidable part of the democratic process itself. After all, the usual way for politicians to be held ‘accountable’ for their political shortcomings has simply been by losing elections.

So maybe the real story here is not just about Obama’s traitorous actions, but also about how and why so many Americans – supposedly citizens of a free society – either could not see Obama’s anti-Americanism, or worse, openly supported it. So who’s really accountable?

When Obama first became president in 2008, it was glaringly clear that he was no friend of America. Calling upon Americans to “summon a new spirit of service,” his collectivist philosophy became much more explicit in his second term, when during his January 2013 inaugural speech he announced that “preserving our individual freedom requires collective action.” Continue reading »