913 – The epistemology of God—and the debate over nothing

 Comments Off on 913 – The epistemology of God—and the debate over nothing
May 212025
 


Whether theist or atheist, both sides of the debate usually share the same logical fallacy – the fallacy of non-existence. On that premise, science invented the ‘big bang’ theory while religion invented the ‘creation’ narrative.

At the heart of the dilemma lies the attempt to resolve a philosophical issue (the nature and fact of existence) by means other than philosophy. Neither science nor faith alone are capable of addressing such an issue.

The flaw in most of the ‘creation of the universe’ theories and beliefs is that they presume that there was once a condition of ‘non-existence’ out of which arose existence itself. It is not even possible to conceptualize a condition described as ‘non-existence’ and with good reason; any attempt to do so is contradictory.

To suggest that ‘nothing exists’ or or to refer to the ‘existence of non-existence’ is self contradictory and therefore meaningless. Yet from science to religion, we see an acceptance of the ‘existence of non existence’ as if that was some kind of valid premise on which to base any theories or beliefs. Continue reading »

912 – Monsters to destroy—for the neocon agenda

 Comments Off on 912 – Monsters to destroy—for the neocon agenda
May 142025
 


“On July 4, 1821, John Quincy Adams delivered the most-remembered speech of his career. The oration’s resounding climax included several famous lines – that America ‘goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy,’ for example, and that an America that aspired to world leadership, even in the name of noble ideas, would be led astray: ‘She might become the dictatress of the world. She would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit.’ Even as American foreign policy has warped in many of the ways Adams foresaw, it has been unable to bury his powerful words.” (-from the ‘John Quincy Adams Society’ website)

It is in this light that controversial issues like America’s foreign policy, the war in Ukraine, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, globalism, a one world government, and significantly – Zionism and the neocon movement – are now being discussed. Complicating the discussion is the constant matter of definition and context.

“Narratives are built by removing history,” observes Salim Mansur, so as to “serve the interest of whoever you are advocating for.”

Not surprisingly, with the re-introduction of the relevant history into the narrative, one soon discovers that the narrative often changes radically, rarely serving the narrow interests of those promoting the original. Continue reading »

Neoconservatism Part III — America Betrayed

 Foreign Relations, Globalism, Latest, Military, Politics, Video  Comments Off on Neoconservatism Part III — America Betrayed
May 072025
 


In the third installment of our discussion on neoconservatism, Professor Salim Mansur examines the post-Soviet era, a period marked by complex dynamics and post-Cold War tensions. Rather than embracing Russia as a potential ally and a nascent democracy recovering from decades of communism and autocratic rule, the United States eventually came to cast it as a new “monster to destroy.”

This shift undermined America’s founding principle of rational isolationism with limited international engagement as it sought to maintain hegemony in an emerging multipolar world. The pivot fueled hostility both domestically and internationally, channeling billions into the military-industrial complex and perpetuating endless conflict.

Central to this narrative is the unwavering defense of Israel, which, alongside the focus on Russia, shapes American foreign policy. Crafted by neoconservatives and embraced by hawks across administrations since George H. W. Bush, this dual focus has defined U.S. global strategy. The neoconservative agenda, explicitly outlined in the Project for the New American Century (1997), drove NATO expansion and heightened tensions in the Middle East.

Ultimately, neoconservatism has betrayed America’s early ideals, costing countless lives, squandering vast fortunes, and tarnishing the reputation of a once-great nation.

(This video presentation is also available on YouTube.)

If you enjoyed this presentation please consider offering your financial support:
🧡 PayPal

911 – The minority report—Canada’s democracy inaction

 Comments Off on 911 – The minority report—Canada’s democracy inaction
May 072025
 


On the heels of a Canadian election that both started and ended with a minority Liberal government, the term ‘democracy inaction’ takes on a new meaning.

Unfortunately, also on the heels of the Canadian election, evidence is beginning to surface that Canada’s electoral system is corrupt and that the 2025 election was rigged in numerous and subtle ways.

In a riding he held for many years, Pierre Poilievre, despite leading his Conservative Party to its best performance in decades, nevertheless lost his own seat in the riding of Carleton. And while criticizing Poilievre on campaign strategies and policies that may have hurt him is fair comment, holding him responsible for the loss of his own seat is not.

For example, Poilievre’s 2025 ballot contained 91 ‘candidates’ names and in the upcoming Alberta byelection in which he expects to regain a seat in parliament, a lobby group calling itself the ‘Longest Ballot Committee’ plans to add over 200 names to the byelection ballot. While this presents more of an inconvenience to voters than to Poilievre, the mere fact that Elections Canada permits such open and obvious manipulation of the ballot speaks to a deep systemic corruption within Canada’s entire electoral system.

Worse, the riding of Carleton, which Poilievre held for many years, was a different riding during previous elections. However, shortly before the 2025 election, Poilievre’s riding was gerrymandered to include a huge additional political jurisdiction consisting of a solid majority of Liberal voters. Continue reading »

910 – Future shock—the science and politics of the coming era

 Comments Off on 910 – Future shock—the science and politics of the coming era
Apr 302025
 


It appears that the ‘future’ is not so much ahead of us, as behind us, given emerging accounts of advanced technologies far beyond our average daily experience.

Now that the White House has officially acknowledged these technologies, it is becoming increasingly clear why Donald Trump’s creation of a Space Force during his first presidency was critical to his greater agenda – and to the lives of every individual on this planet.

Increasingly, more and more accounts are surfacing regarding what might be regarded as quantum leaps in technology, so much so, that most who first hear about these technologies cannot bring themselves to believe it. As physicist Ashton Forbes expressed it, they are collectively choosing to remain in a state of “wilful ignorance.”

The disbelief is understandable. The technologies being described include everything from ‘anti-gravity’ propulsion to unlimited ‘free energy,’ to a complete command of inter-planetary space travel. The obvious question that arises is, why haven’t these technologies, purportedly around for many decades, not become part of our common experience? Continue reading »

908 – Trump’s tariff trials—verdicts pending

 Comments Off on 908 – Trump’s tariff trials—verdicts pending
Apr 162025
 


Will Trump’s tariff strategies to make America great again actually work, or is Trump just becoming another global protectionist? That’s been the great debate since ‘liberation day’ when the tariffs took effect.

Interestingly, it’s a debate that seems to be conducted within the ranks of those generally seen to be on the Right.

But the real debate may be the nature of the debate itself. For some, the debate over tariffs is strictly economic; for others, political. For Trump, it appears to be both.

For Trump, the use of tariffs is neither an end in itself, nor is it being done in a vacuum. Accompanied by a myriad of economic reforms and regulation reductions, perhaps the most significant positive impact on Americans will be Trump’s elimination of the income tax – an issue closely linked to tariffs and trade duties.

Unfortunately, it appears that there continue to be many long accepted myths circulating about the impact of tariffs, including an almost complete lack of knowledge about the actual history of tariffs.

Similarly, there continue to be many myths in circulation about Trump himself, particularly with regard to his economic agenda – for free trade.

Is it possible that tariffs, which by their nature impede trade, can actually be a means to establish free trade? Trump seems to think so. Whether he proves to be Just Right will be a determination for the future, after the verdicts currently pending are finally rendered.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

907 – Anti-feminine isms—and the destruction of femininity

 Comments Off on 907 – Anti-feminine isms—and the destruction of femininity
Apr 092025
 


Dictionaries define ‘femininity’ as: “(1) the quality or nature of the female sex; womanliness; (2) the female form; (3) the sum of all attributes that convey (or are perceived to convey) womanhood.”

So whatever happened to femininity as a social value? Perhaps that question was already answered over a century ago. It would be difficult to believe that when British writer Arabella Kenealy published her book Feminism and Sex-Extinction in 1920, she could possibly have envisaged the 2025 dystopian reality of her predictions.

“Feminism, the extremist – and of late years the predominant cult of the Woman’s Movement, is Masculinism,” she asserted.

“It makes for such training and development in woman, of male characteristics, as shall equip her to compete with the male in every department of life; academic, athletic, professional, political, industrial. And it neither recognises nor admits in her natural aptitudes differing from those of men, and fitting her, accordingly, for different functions in these. It rejects all concessions to her womanhood; even to her mother-function. It repudiates all privileges for her. Boldly it demands a fair field only and no favour; equal rights, political and social, identical education and training, identical economic opportunities and avocations, an identical morale, personal and public.

“(The Feminist Creed) calls for the elimination of sex differences and the abolition of sex distinctions in every department of life and activity. Continue reading »

 Older Entries  Newer Entries