781 – On the war fronts—from Covid to climate

 Comments Off on 781 – On the war fronts—from Covid to climate
Oct 202022
 


Behind the totalitarian urge to form a “one world” government lies a veritable menu of sinister conspiracies. We have reached a point of convergence where it is increasingly difficult to separate otherwise seemingly unrelated events from each other.

Fighting climate change. Fighting Russians. Fighting Covid. Fighting free speech. Threatening nuclear war. Forcing vaccine injections. Collapsing currencies. Stealing elections. Etc.

Taken individually, each of these events is concerning enough. Together, they are symptoms of a civilization in the process of collapsing. When civilizations collapse, they do so on many fronts, but in the end, there is really only one battlefront: the philosophical one.

Philosophy embodies values, and differences in philosophies become most visible when in political conflict. These conflicts manifest themselves more within nations than between them. Hence, Left versus Right.

However, when it comes to the Left, not only is it in conflict with the Right, but with reality itself. So positioned, Leftist ideology is always forced to rely on coercion and conspiracy to gain power.

It is ironic that those who expose the Left’s conspiracies should be labeled “conspiracy theorists” when the conspirators themselves openly announce their conspiratorial plans well in advance, even giving them names like the ‘Great Re-set!” Worse, whenever the Left observes increasing numbers on the Right acting in unison, this is presented as evidence of “conspiracy.”

However, unlike tyranny, freedom is not sustained by force and fraud, but through reason and consent. When human beings collectively abide by a reality-based moral code that is Just Right, calling it a conspiracy is just wrong.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

780 – Nuclear holocaust?

 Comments Off on 780 – Nuclear holocaust?
Oct 132022
 


Not since the Cuban missile crisis has the possibility of a nuclear weapon detonated on North American soil been seriously contemplated. Nor has there been any reason to do so, particularly given the recent unprecedented period of global peace under the presidency of Donald Trump.

Yet after only 24 months into his stolen presidency, Joe Biden’s government is sending strong signals that such a nuclear event is inevitable. This is suspicious, something generally predictable only by those planning to make it so.

Among the suspicious signals: Biden’s recent cryptic September 1 speech in Philadelphia, New York City’s public service announcement on surviving a nuclear attack, the city of Denver’s evacuation preparations involving “Bug-out bags” and the US government’s $290 million purchase of an anti-radiation drug to be distributed free to survivors of a nuclear attack.

Taken individually, each action alone would suggest that Biden’s government is planning a false flag event. Taken together, they practically scream “nuclear plandemic.”

Intending to blame Russia and Vladimir Putin for their false flag event, any nuclear narrative so framed will be a difficult sell particularly given recent events in Ukraine. Putin’s restraint in the face of the West’s aggression and hostility has consistently exhibited a level of morality and concern for human life that far exceeds that of NATO and its allies.

The more we learn about Putin, the more we come to respect him as a true world leader, one who is the exact opposite of how he has been portrayed in Western circles. The more we learn about the military alliance known as NATO, the less it is possible to respect any of its initiatives or actions on the world stage – at any time in its history. Increasingly it appears that NATO has never done anything Just Right for peace and freedom, while fooling much of the world to believe otherwise.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

779 – Calling for a mass reformation—under ethical principles

 Comments Off on 779 – Calling for a mass reformation—under ethical principles
Oct 062022
 


There have been some divisions developing within the ranks of those who appear to be allies in the information war. American psychiatrist Dr Peter Breggin has recently been making the talk show rounds arguing that Dr Robert Malone (developer of the mRNA technology) and Dr Mattias Desmet (professor in clinical psychology) share an agenda “to destroy our ability to identify the enemy.”

Central to the controversy is Mattias Desmet’s theory of “mass formation,” which essentially describes how collectivism leads to the totalitarian state.

His recent interview by Tucker Carlson, seen by millions, expanded the discussion to Desmet’s conclusion that the essence of life transcends purely rational understanding. Moreover, his insights into “mass formation” have led Desmet to an optimistic prediction that a return to “the eternal ethical principles of humanity” can and will solve humanity’s collectivist crisis.

Nevertheless, Dr Breggin insists that Desmet’s “mass formation” theory and his calls for an ethical revolution are part of an agenda that “shifts the blame” from the elitists imposing the current crisis upon us to the victims themselves. However from afar it seems less a “shift” in blame than a “sharing” of the blame if that is relevant at all.

No matter the motivations or other agendas in play, any call for a mass reformation based on “the eternal ethical principles of humanity” sounds Just Right to us.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

778 – Ukraine—Putin’s nuclear reaction

 Comments Off on 778 – Ukraine—Putin’s nuclear reaction
Sep 292022
 


At a time when the West is playing nuclear poker with Russia over Ukraine, official narratives are ignoring all of the pertinent facts, histories, and events necessary for any rational understanding of the situation.

The contrast between those narratives and the reality of the situation is startling. And perhaps the greatest contrast concerns Vladimir Putin himself.

On the heels of world-renown financial/political expert Martin Armstrong’s announcement of his upcoming book, The Plot to Seize Russia, his soon-to-be-released narrative about Putin is certain to surprise many.

Armstrong’s revelations are a game-changer for anyone who only knows the official narrative about Putin. A first-hand observer of Putin’s rise to power, he spent seven years in prison after being falsely implicated in the plot of which he writes.

Putin is neither a communist nor a member of the deep state, says Armstrong. And even more fascinatingly, all those “murders” assumed to have been committed by Putin were actually conducted by Russia’s own deep state (and named by Armstrong), of which Putin was never a part.

And most significantly, Putin has done everything possible to avert the crisis in Ukraine. Since the beginning, and even earlier, Putin has been absolutely clear and precise about why Russian troops entered Ukraine, stated his intentions and goals in advance, and followed through with subsequent action.

Now, Putin has issued a “new clear” warning about his willingness to respond to Western aggression with nuclear weapons. Whether such action is justifiable is a question that will no doubt be debated for many years to come.

It is in everyone’s interest to learn everything they can about the Ukraine crisis; getting it Just Right is key to preventing that crisis from visiting our own doorsteps.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

777 – Unsustainable tyranny is the real development

 Comments Off on 777 – Unsustainable tyranny is the real development
Sep 222022
 


The condition of tyranny is not “sustainable” in the traditional sense of that word because tyranny can only be “sustained” by the use of force and fraud. So when tyrannical governments begin to talk about “sustainable development” you can be certain that whatever is meant by that floating abstraction is not sustainable, and that the only development is a political one.

Perhaps the most significant recent “development” on the political front has been the Left’s escalated assault against Donald Trump as the mid-term elections draw ever closer. From lawsuits to all the frenzied propaganda about “right-wing extremism,” these actions are indicative of those in an urgent panic.

“Trump openly embraces Qanon (sic) conspiracies” read a Sept 19 Associated Press headline, which concluded by suggesting that this “allows Trump to endorse their beliefs and their hope for a violent uprising without expressly saying so.”

While that conclusion is once again a projection of how the Left thinks, the mere fact that the fake news media even acknowledged the ‘Q’ phenomenon in such a misrepresentative context is seen by many on the Right as a positive sign. It suggests an incredible insecurity and degree of fear on the part of the Left.

That fear is justified. Authoritarian de-population campaigns manifested through a fake pandemic, a fake vaccine, a fake climate crisis, fake sustainable development agendas, and a fake concern for anyone’s well-being have all taken their toll and become too obvious to avoid.

The current wave of propaganda warning how “right-wing extremism” is becoming increasingly mainstream is simply more evidence that the Left is losing ground. Worse, the Left fears being held accountable for failing to do what’s Right – which is always and unavoidably an “extreme” position to take, just as are all things Left.

To the authoritarians on the Left, you’re an extremist if you dare to question authority before authority questions you. Funnily enough, on that count they might be Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

776 – Media fascists—calling for a police state

 Comments Off on 776 – Media fascists—calling for a police state
Sep 152022
 


In a Sept 1 Open Letter to Prime Minister Trudeau, a group of prominent Canadian media interests called for the establishment of nothing less than a police state. “We are asking police forces to take several immediate steps… to combat abuse of journalists and all victims of online hate and harassment,” they chimed.

Among signatories to the request are the National Post, the Globe & Mail, Canadian Association of Broadcasters, the Canadian Association of Journalists, the Winnipeg Free Press, Toronto Star, TV Ontario, Quebecor, Postmedia, OMNI News, La Presse, City News, and many others.

Citing a global problem “in relation to the increasing and alarming online hate and harassment targeting journalists and journalism as a profession,” the letter called for an abandonment of investigating “individual complaints.” Instead, it called for a system allowing the media itself to report “patterns” that identify “connections of extremist groups” by means of “similar language, the language commonly used by domestic extremist groups.”

Lacking any specifics or examples, the letter is evidence of an inability to counter alternative narratives that demonstrate how inaccurate and misleading their own news coverage has been. The deafening silence from the state-sponsored media in response to Joe Biden’s Sept 1 speech served as an ironic backdrop to the request from a media that can no longer be trusted to report the news.

As accumulating data and verifiable narratives continue to show how the “fake news media” earned its reputation, the natural resentment and disgust with fake news is now being experienced as “online hate and harassment.” But instead of countering alternative narratives with their own, the media fascists have opted for state control of the competition.

Of course, the right thing to always do is to ensure an exchange of ideas and perspectives in an open forum free of any censorship. Through such exchanges – or from a refusal to participate in them – one can best discover and learn to trust those media sources that consistently prove to be Just Right in their search for the truth.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

775 – Projection—Joe Biden’s democratic appeal

 1 Response »
Sep 082022
 


When The New York Times published the verbatim transcript of Joe Biden’s September 1 speech in Philadelphia, it was described as a speech about the “ongoing threats to democracy in the United States.” That “threat,” of course, is Donald Trump.

“Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our Republic,” proclaimed Biden. “They embrace anger. They thrive on chaos. They live, not in the light of truth but in the shadow of lies. You saw law enforcement brutally attacked on January the 6th. We can’t allow violence to be normalized in this country. We’re all called by duty and conscience to confront extremists who put their own pursuit of power above all else.”

This of course was pure projection, and as such, attests to the reality that it is Biden who is the real threat to democracy in the United States. Projection is a form of psychological or tactical self-defense, primarily used by those who are guilty of whatever accusations are being projected.

Worse, Biden’s terrorist rhetoric has created expectations of a “false flag” event, and it is this that has rightly caused the greatest concern.

But when it came to “democracy” itself, Biden’s message was all but lost in the controversy generated by his fascist demeanour, visually asserted in imagery as undemocratic as one could possibly imagine. Less about a threat to democracy, the “democratic” theme of his presentation revealed a message that was nothing short of confessing to a stolen election.

To understand why and how, one simply has to analyze Biden’s speech in a way that is Just Right – in a way that corresponds to reality.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

 Older Entries  Newer Entries