785 – Socialized health care—the monopoly of tyrants | Dr Roger Hodkinson

 Comments Off on 785 – Socialized health care—the monopoly of tyrants | Dr Roger Hodkinson
Nov 172022
 


With calls to “flatten the curve” used to justify the first lock-downs and mandated mRNA injections back in 2020-21, it was immediately clear that the patient requiring a cure was the health care system itself.

In response to recent revelations and admissions that the public was lied to, our guest Dr Roger Hodkinson warns that we have reached a “devastating moment for medicine.” He has also accused the state-monopolized socialized health care system of being a “closed shop” that promotes “state sanctioned murder.”

The reality is that socialized health care is only capable of flat-“lining” a health care system, not of “flattening” any demand curve for its services. Unless of course, that demand curve is being flattened by killing the demand itself – quite literally.

In the wake of devastating and unprecedented death rates and adverse reactions to the injections, it appears that this may have been the intended plan all along. Flatten the curve by flat-lining the patients. If so, it is tragically ironic that when officials originally told us they would “flatten the curve” they were Just Right, even though how they were doing it was just wrong.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Nov 102022
 


Faced with the incredible scale of crimes against humanity related to the mandated rollouts of “Covid vaccines,” our guest Dr Roger Hodkinson attracted international attention after having cited global statistics that paint a horrific picture. At least twenty million have died directly due to the injections, while another two billion suffered severe adverse reactions.

“I’m calling it the Big Kill. We’ve seen the biggest kill ever in medicine’s history,” says Dr Hodkinson. “And it’s the physicians, not just the politicians, who are principally culpable because they have allowed government’s jackboots to influence how they manage their patients – which has never ever happened before.”

In the midst of this reality, and on the heels of various official admissions that producers and distributors of the injections knew about the dangers all along, calls for “amnesty” are surfacing from those who granted no such considerations while promoting the lies.

“Absolutely not. I’m full of vengeance. I’m vengeful. It’s not a time to say I’m sorry. Let’s put these bastards in jail!”

Adapted from a much broader conversation available on Just Right’s video channels, on today’s broadcast Dr Hodkinson calls upon the principles of “First do no harm” and “informed consent” as necessary fundamentals to any ethical practice of medicine.

Upon further consideration, it seems to us that applying the principles of “First do no harm” and “informed consent” to the political arena may prove to be Just Right for what ails the body politic as well.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

783 – Electoral shock—the fallout of political polarity

 Comments Off on 783 – Electoral shock—the fallout of political polarity
Nov 032022
 


With the midterms on its doorstep, America appears poised for an electoral shock. It is a shock that some are trying to avoid by calling for an end to the “political polarization” that could split the nation.

But this is neither possible, nor desirable. The polarization of ideas is the whole point of politics, without which it is impossible to clearly distinguish one choice from the other. It is a lack of polarization that has led to the persistent Leftward drift towards tyranny.

The term “polar opposite” describes the “extreme” nature of polarity, such as north and south, positive and negative, and of course, Left and Right. Politically, the Left represents collectivism and tyranny; the Right represents its opposite: individualism and freedom.

Unfortunately, this polar distinction has been intentionally hidden. By falsely and incorrectly associating the Leftist ideology of fascism and its variants with the Right, the Left has successfully handicapped those on the Right from being able to effectively distance themselves from the Left.

Consequently, many have dismissed the Left-Right political labels entirely, correctly viewing them as a useless means of distinction. But even so, these labels still carry great power as the chief means of ideological identity within the political arena. It is ironic that the very people immobilized by the mere suggestion of being labeled right wing are among those declaring political labels to be useless.

It is clear that America’s Left is in a panic. Between Hillary Clinton’s calls to “crush the coup,” and bizarre media assertions that an “attack” on Paul Pelosi is an example of “political violence” resulting from “hyper-partisanship and divisive political rhetoric,” it appears that America’s increased polarization is something the Left fears greatly.

Understanding that the Left represents tyranny and the Right represent freedom is the real polarity and truth that the Left seeks to hide in its fog of indistinguishable labels. They know that the failure to polarize issues will result in a failure to distinguish between not only Left and Right, but between good and evil, life and death.

Thankfully, given America’s currently polarized condition, the probability that Americans will vote for candidates that are Just Right is higher than ever, raising hopes that a red wave can slow and reverse America’s drift toward tyranny.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

782 – Unconscionable—the death of medical ethics

 Comments Off on 782 – Unconscionable—the death of medical ethics
Oct 272022
 


“Unconscionable” is the most succinct way to describe the past and current actions of Canada’s health care monopolists. From restricting cancer treatments to forcing deadly Covid protocols and vaccine mandates, their every decision has been destructive to the broader health of Canadians, while explicitly serving political interests.

The unconscionable and willful blindness of the medical and political establishment expressed towards the injured and dead victims of their Covid agenda merely adds insult to injury. Among the dead are an astonishing number of young doctors who have passed away not long after having received a mandated “vaccine.”

As if that wasn’t bad enough, evidence has surfaced that health officials have been intentionally deleting the public records of the doctor deaths. And even more astonishingly, it appears that this practice of deleting any evidence of “vaccine” harm is now being applied to members of the general public as well.

From the beginning of the “vaccine” rollout to this day, the health care establishment abandoned the principle of providing “informed consent” as a fundamental medical ethic with regard to adults. Then unconscionably it instituted an unprecedented policy of allowing minors to “consent” to an injection without the knowledge of the parent or guardian. Given that minors lack the legal capacity to consent, this is akin to statutory rape and should be treated in the same light.

But when it comes to ever setting things Just Right again, the unconscionable and unethical medical practices so readily adopted today suggest that we’ve got a long wait ahead of us.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

781 – On the war fronts—from Covid to climate

 Comments Off on 781 – On the war fronts—from Covid to climate
Oct 202022
 


Behind the totalitarian urge to form a “one world” government lies a veritable menu of sinister conspiracies. We have reached a point of convergence where it is increasingly difficult to separate otherwise seemingly unrelated events from each other.

Fighting climate change. Fighting Russians. Fighting Covid. Fighting free speech. Threatening nuclear war. Forcing vaccine injections. Collapsing currencies. Stealing elections. Etc.

Taken individually, each of these events is concerning enough. Together, they are symptoms of a civilization in the process of collapsing. When civilizations collapse, they do so on many fronts, but in the end, there is really only one battlefront: the philosophical one.

Philosophy embodies values, and differences in philosophies become most visible when in political conflict. These conflicts manifest themselves more within nations than between them. Hence, Left versus Right.

However, when it comes to the Left, not only is it in conflict with the Right, but with reality itself. So positioned, Leftist ideology is always forced to rely on coercion and conspiracy to gain power.

It is ironic that those who expose the Left’s conspiracies should be labeled “conspiracy theorists” when the conspirators themselves openly announce their conspiratorial plans well in advance, even giving them names like the ‘Great Re-set!” Worse, whenever the Left observes increasing numbers on the Right acting in unison, this is presented as evidence of “conspiracy.”

However, unlike tyranny, freedom is not sustained by force and fraud, but through reason and consent. When human beings collectively abide by a reality-based moral code that is Just Right, calling it a conspiracy is just wrong.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

780 – Nuclear holocaust?

 Comments Off on 780 – Nuclear holocaust?
Oct 132022
 


Not since the Cuban missile crisis has the possibility of a nuclear weapon detonated on North American soil been seriously contemplated. Nor has there been any reason to do so, particularly given the recent unprecedented period of global peace under the presidency of Donald Trump.

Yet after only 24 months into his stolen presidency, Joe Biden’s government is sending strong signals that such a nuclear event is inevitable. This is suspicious, something generally predictable only by those planning to make it so.

Among the suspicious signals: Biden’s recent cryptic September 1 speech in Philadelphia, New York City’s public service announcement on surviving a nuclear attack, the city of Denver’s evacuation preparations involving “Bug-out bags” and the US government’s $290 million purchase of an anti-radiation drug to be distributed free to survivors of a nuclear attack.

Taken individually, each action alone would suggest that Biden’s government is planning a false flag event. Taken together, they practically scream “nuclear plandemic.”

Intending to blame Russia and Vladimir Putin for their false flag event, any nuclear narrative so framed will be a difficult sell particularly given recent events in Ukraine. Putin’s restraint in the face of the West’s aggression and hostility has consistently exhibited a level of morality and concern for human life that far exceeds that of NATO and its allies.

The more we learn about Putin, the more we come to respect him as a true world leader, one who is the exact opposite of how he has been portrayed in Western circles. The more we learn about the military alliance known as NATO, the less it is possible to respect any of its initiatives or actions on the world stage – at any time in its history. Increasingly it appears that NATO has never done anything Just Right for peace and freedom, while fooling much of the world to believe otherwise.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

779 – Calling for a mass reformation—under ethical principles

 Comments Off on 779 – Calling for a mass reformation—under ethical principles
Oct 062022
 


There have been some divisions developing within the ranks of those who appear to be allies in the information war. American psychiatrist Dr Peter Breggin has recently been making the talk show rounds arguing that Dr Robert Malone (developer of the mRNA technology) and Dr Mattias Desmet (professor in clinical psychology) share an agenda “to destroy our ability to identify the enemy.”

Central to the controversy is Mattias Desmet’s theory of “mass formation,” which essentially describes how collectivism leads to the totalitarian state.

His recent interview by Tucker Carlson, seen by millions, expanded the discussion to Desmet’s conclusion that the essence of life transcends purely rational understanding. Moreover, his insights into “mass formation” have led Desmet to an optimistic prediction that a return to “the eternal ethical principles of humanity” can and will solve humanity’s collectivist crisis.

Nevertheless, Dr Breggin insists that Desmet’s “mass formation” theory and his calls for an ethical revolution are part of an agenda that “shifts the blame” from the elitists imposing the current crisis upon us to the victims themselves. However from afar it seems less a “shift” in blame than a “sharing” of the blame if that is relevant at all.

No matter the motivations or other agendas in play, any call for a mass reformation based on “the eternal ethical principles of humanity” sounds Just Right to us.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal