Comments Off on 966 – Britain’s Far Right—zeroing in on the Right label
May272026
Organized and led by Tommy Robinson, Britain’s May 16 2026 ‘Unite the Kingdom’ rally/march was condemned by Prime Minister Kier Starmer as an event organized by “convicted thugs and racists peddling hatred and division. Plain and simple.”
Calling it a “march designed to confront and intimidate this diverse city and country,” Starmer argued that his “Labour government will block Far Right agitants from travelling to Britain for that event. Because we will not allow people to come to the U.K. to threaten our communities and spread hate on our streets.”
But instead of dissuading people from attending, it was perhaps the most effective promotional announcement for the event that could possibly have been scripted. Far from being attended by only 60.000 people as some Leftist media sources reported, it was by far the largest event of its kind in British history. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 965 – Economics—just a socialist econspiracy?
May202026
One could argue that the Left has been using the very word ‘economics’ as an ‘econspiracy’ towards its objective of seizing the means of production.
As explained by Franck Zanu, host of the Zanu Project Rethink, “economics is simply a social science” which studies the mechanisms of supply and demand. But with socialist politicians promising to deliver ‘economic power’ to their constituents, he points out that there is no such thing: “It is not a tangible thing that anybody can ‘give’ anybody.”
Lamenting that most people do not understand the relationship between citizens and government, he warns that those who believe “that a government’s job is to give people economic power… are doomed forever.”
Worse, with socialist proclamations that the ‘top one or two per cent’ control 90% of a nation’s wealth, it is forgotten that, as Zanu explains: “the two per cent are not ‘controlling’ the economy – they created it.” Continue reading »
Comments Off on 964 – Why socialism is evil—Every Variant Is Leftist
May132026
With socialists and communists occupying elected positions in both the United States and Canada, how is it possible that so many people living in the most free nations on earth could possibly embrace the ideology of socialism?
That’s a question plaguing many on the Right, who often mistakenly assume that those on the Left share their love of individual freedom.
“From each according to his ability to each according to his need” has long been a socialist bromide, seen by some as a virtuous altruistic ideology upon which a society should be based.
But one need only take that slogan literally to recognize that this is a prescription for human slavery – the very political prescription that is followed by socialist, communist, and fascist dictatorships everywhere.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 963 – Reservations not required—they’re just an Indian Act
May062026
In the wake of outrageous and absurd ‘indigenous land claims’ being made on lands and territories where no such claims can possibly be valid, the time has long passed to settle a few issues and questions surrounding the real political agenda behind these claims.
From the issue of basic definitions and terms, to the actual history of North America’s Indians, and to their current conditions when segregated on ‘Indian reservations,’ ignorance about these factors has led to the creation of racist narratives used by the Left to justify its continual attacks against basic private property rights.
On the definition front, in his May 3 Substack article, Robert Vaughan explains that “The myth of the ‘indigenous’ somehow being special is simply that – a myth.” Citing the roots and definition of the word ‘indigenous,’ he observes that “Nobody can be considered to be ‘Indigenous’ to the place they currently live – not the English in Britain, not the Chinese in China, and not the ‘Indigenous’ peoples of North America.”
Beyond this epistemological crisis, there have been decades of fictional stories and histories told about North America’s Indians, leading to the false impression that ‘racism’ was somehow at the root of the disputes and wars between them and the new European settlers. But far from being peaceful and noble stewards of the land, as so many narratives depict them, “The Indians were brutal – to settlers and to each other.” (Matt Walsh, April 2, 2026) Continue reading »
Comments Off on 962 – Have no faith in constitution—but in yourselves
Apr292026
Preserving the free nation that has been handed down to its descendants is a mission that many on the Right would wholeheartedly defend, and rightly so.
Towards that end, the importance or significance of having a written constitution to preserve and identify certain basic principles and rules upon which such a country is founded is paramount.
However, even when such documents exist, laws and constitutions aren’t worth the paper they’re written on if the people to whom they apply no longer abide by them.
When it comes right down to it, with or without a written constitution, all societies are effectively governed or ruled by convention. That means that whatever current values and practices are being applied and broadly accepted without resistance or opposition effectively become the law. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 961 – The Right’s struggle—with being Right
Apr222026
How is it that ‘socialism’ continues to gain so much popular and political support when it should be understood by all that socialism destroys wealth and causes poverty?
And how is it that ‘capitalism’ continues to lose popular and political support when it should be understood by all that capitalism is the only system capable of producing wealth and creating prosperity?
As many on the Right struggle to understand this, they have been entertaining the idea that the Right has a ‘branding problem.’ Ironically this is correct, but the ‘problem’ is less about ‘branding’ than it is about a failure to precisely define what it is that requires branding.
For example, among the various factions considered to be on the Right are ‘small-c conservatives,’ libertarians, patriots, freedom-loving individuals, nationalists, free trade advocates, constitutionalists, reformers and others. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 960 – Language of fools—socialism’s absurdity
Apr152026
In the aftermath of the world-wide ridicule and laughter directed at the Woke behavior witnessed at Canada’s NDP conference, it was easy to overlook the fact that the same behavior was being exhibited elsewhere, most notably at the so-called ‘No Kings’ rallies held in both the United States and in Canada.
Fueled exclusively by what is widely recognized as TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome), these protests once again illustrated the absurdity of those on the Left, as they attempted to equate Donald Trump’s democratically established presidential authority with that of some kind of medieval monarch.
And on another socialist front, the latest Woke phrase to attract further laughter and ridicule apparently goes by the acronym: MMIWG2SLGBT2QIA+
The utterly ridiculous concept described by this acronym is “Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women Girls and 2 Spirit Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Queer Questioning Intersex and Asexual Plus People.” Of course, there is no such thing or class of people. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 959 – You will own nothing NDP happy—socialism is an absurdity
Apr082026
In vowing that his party would use “the unmatched power of public ownership,” Canada’s New Democratic Party leader Avis Lewis was really saying “You will own nothing NDP happy.”
As the world ridiculed and laughed at all of the ‘points of privilege’ who attended the party’s March 29 conference in Winnipeg Manitoba, the really laughable fool at the event was Avi Lewis himself, as he and his party continue to advocate the absurdity that is ‘socialism’.
Citing private enterprise and private profits, Lewis reminded his audience “that this country is awash in wealth. We can have nice things. The money is there! We need a government with the courage to go and get it for all of us.”
That such glaring envy, greed, and avarice should be seen as something to be admired in a political party leader – along with his outright calls for the theft of private property – is perhaps among the greatest tragedies of today’s political zeitgeist. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 958 – Story time—heroes tell the tale
Apr012026
Is it possible that the most dangerous weapon in the entire world is a story? It’s a proposition that carries more weight than most might imagine.
If you’ve ever wondered why ‘controlling the narrative’ has become such a common phrase, it’s because as never before, people are becoming aware of the fact that they are perpetually immersed in an information war upon which the nature and values of their culture is being contested.
Behind the West’s growing dystopian zeitgeist has been a concerted effort on the part of the American entertainment industry to hijack the great stories and heroes of the distant and recent past. From stories about the American revolution to the sci-fi and fantasy realm of Superman and Star Trek, the promotion of heroism has virtually been abandoned, and with it, any concept or clarity about what distinguishes good from evil. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 957 – Ballot boxing—the fight for voting integrity
Mar252026
Voting integrity: “On this one issue, we either get to keep America or Lose America” warns American lawyer Peter Ticktin.
With the introduction of the Save America Act (requiring voter ID and proof of citizenship), the fight for voting integrity has entered the arena of a ‘ballot boxing match,’ with the Right in one corner on the side of voter and voting transparency and with the Left in the other corner on the side of secretive and hidden tabulation of votes.
Despite the overwhelming number of Americans polled supporting voter ID, the Left remains adamantly opposed to these requirements. This fact alone should be all the evidence needed to conclude that the Left is dependent on both voter fraud and rigging elections.
After all, the principles behind conducting open and transparent elections are so simple and clear that to obfuscate them should be considered criminal. They include the prohibition of mail-in ballots and machine sourced vote counts. Above all, the use of paper ballots, voter I.D., and a one day voting period should be the norm. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 956 – Intuitively speaking—about the risks and power of intuition
Mar182026
Using claims that artificial intelligence is becoming ‘conscious’ and ‘intuitive,’ governments are now planning their next artificial crisis from which to save us.
Speaking at the Canadian Senate’s ‘Committee on Matters Relating to the Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Canada,’ Professor Geoffrey Hinton, introduced as the “godfather of A.I.,” painted a dystopian future of A.I. clearly calculated to induce terror and fear.
The fear-mongering echoes past panics over climate and pandemics, but intuition itself offers the antidote. True intuition guards and protects, always rooted in reality and aligned with our best interests. It leaps from A to Z instantly, bypassing the slow plod of logic, and delivers ‘lightning-like’ warnings we ignore at our peril. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 955 – Regime changes—from Iran to Canada
Mar112026
“Regime change has a history of destructive regimes being replaced by better ones,” argues Dinesh D’Souza in anticipation of Iran’s liberation. And on that count, he has concluded that “the only people mourning regime change in Iran are the Democrats, the mullahs, and Tucker Carlson.”
And while all eyes are focused on Iran, few are aware of other regime changes occurring in Canada, most notably in the provinces of British Columbia and Alberta.
With the recent announcement by Dallas Brodie (member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia representing the electoral district of Vancouver-Quilchena) that the Canadian federal government “has granted aboriginal title over all of the lower mainland to the Musqueamin Indian Band whose population is a mere 1250 band members,” the alarm was sounded that a regime change is taking place without anyone’s knowledge or consent.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 954 – Revelations—from Left to Right
Mar042026
Both this year’s State of the Union Address and Trump’s bombing of Iran have provided explosive revelations about the true divide between the political Left and Right.
Indeed, the way Democrats behaved during Donald Trump’s State of the Union Address (delivered Tuesday Feb 24, 2026) was simply uncivilized. They revealed themselves to be perfect caricatures of everything Left.
The image accompanying this week’s blog post depicts the Democrats on the Left remaining seated, while the Republicans on the Right all stand in affirming that their first duty is to protect American citizens, and not illegal aliens. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 953 – Restoration project—Britain’s last hope?
Feb252026
Is Rupert Lowe’s newly forming political party, ‘Restore Britain,’ really Britain’s last hope to preserve its culture? Apparently, Elon Musk thinks so.
On the other hand, Nigel Farage, leader of Britain’s Reform UK, strongly disagrees:
“Unless we are able to provide a proper democratic antidote to this, then I fear that we will see a rise of a really worrying dangerous form of extreme right ethno-nationalism. And I think that we’re beginning over the last couple of weeks already to see some specimens of it. Nobody over the last quarter century has done more to defeat the genuine intolerant abhorrent extreme far right than me.”
Given his own identification with the Right, boasting that he is an opponent of that polarity calls into question Farage’s motivation behind his condemnation of Restore Britain, which is also identified with the Right.Continue reading »
Canada appears to be on the doorstep of its final demise, as more and more people are discovering the country’s dismal political history and its disintegration as a viable sovereign nation.
It can be argued that Canada is already finished as a nation, particularly in the light of a recent court ruling declaring that various indigenous tribes were the legitimate ‘owners’ of long-established and developed Canadian municipalities – and that not even the Crown had any jurisdiction over such lands.
The re-naming of Vancouver’s Trutch Street to šxʷməθkʷəy̓əmasəm Street in the Musqueam language is an affront not just to Canada’s identity, but to fundamental linguistic principles and to the means of communication itself.
Also symbolic of Canada’s collective mental illness, the recent mass shooting in Tumbler Ridge BC was attributed to a female ‘gun person’ when in fact it was well known that the shooter was a male ‘trans-sexual.’ Continue reading »
Comments Off on 951 – Too stupid for words—irrationality
Feb112026
Over the past several years, we have been subjected to one crisis after another, justifying calls for actions and policies that could be categorized as being ‘ just too stupid for words,’ especially given the growing tyranny that is a consequence of such thinking.
People have been instructed to get vaccinated for a non-existent pandemic, to de-industrialize in an effort to cut carbon dioxide emissions, to limit the First Amendment to prevent the polarization of disagreement, to open borders to hordes of ‘undocumented’ immigrants, to attack ICE agents during the performance of their duties, to wear face masks and social distance to prevent the spread of unidentified viruses, to fight climate change in order to protect the environment, and to support the surgical mutilation of those suffering from gender dysphoria. Just to mention a few.
Wide public support for these irrational actions has been referred to as the result of an ’emotional plague’ by Wilhelm Reich, or as ‘mass formation’ by Mattias Desmet, or as ‘suicidal empathy’ and a ‘mind virus’ by Gad Saad, while the growing wave of stupidity dominating today’s zeitgeist has drawn the attention of a similarly growing number of analysts. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 950 – Identity problem—Left or Right?
Feb042026
The recent arrest of former CNN news anchor Don Lemon has unleashed a flurry of controversy about issues ranging from illegal immigration to free speech.
Charged with two felonies, (1) conspiracy against the right of religious freedom in a place of worship, and (2) violating the FACE Act (Freedom of Access to Clinics Entrances Act), Lemon’s role in storming Cities Church in Saint Paul Minnesota on January 18 has itself been among the many controversies surrounding the event.
Arguing that “It’s traumatic for the people here, but that’s what protesting is all about,” Lemon accused the victims of his ‘protest’ of being “entitled Christians” whose “entitlement comes from a white supremacy.”
What any of this had to do with the protest against the arrest and deportation of illegal aliens by ICE agents is anybody’s guess, but Lemon made it abundantly clear that he himself is an avowed racist who hides behind his “black and gay” identity politics to avoid responsibility for his role in the event. Not as a journalist, but as a participant. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 949 – Intelligently artificial—the contrived AI controversy
Jan282026
When Yuval Noah Harari bizarrely asserted that “Anything made of words will be taken over by AI,” this was not a prediction, but a threat.
Speaking at the Davos World Economic Forum (WEF), his justification for the AI takeover was to circumvent the fact that “humans learned to use words to get strangers to cooperate,” because now something has emerged that will do that for us.
Given that “using words” to get people to cooperate is a process known as persuasion, to say that something ‘better’ has emerged to accomplish this goal suggests that one is abandoning persuasion as a means of achieving cooperation. Or in other words: “When persuasion fails, just use force.” Or censorship. Or propaganda. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 948 – ICE storm—sliding down the slippery slope to insurrection
Jan212026
With U.S. president Donald Trump clearly in a position to unilaterally declare the Insurrection Act over the ongoing obstruction of federal law enforcement by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE), it remains to be seen how far the situation may escalate.
Protests and unrest in Minneapolis have been ongoing since early January 2026, primarily against ICE agents detaining and arresting illegal immigrants. What many observers are asking themselves is: just what are the ‘protesters’ protesting against?
As the War Room’s Harrison Smith noted, “They’re not protesting against rapists and murderers. They’re literally protesting against the arrest of criminals, against law and order itself.”Continue reading »
Comments Off on 947 – Forcing a discussion—about force itself
Jan142026
The extradition of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro under President Donald Trump has unleashed a torrent of pundits on the Right passing moral judgement on the action. And once again, one might be led to conclude that their differing opinions are yet another symptom of the ‘fragmentation’ of the Right.
From Robert Barnes‘ “strict constitutionalist” conclusion that Trump’s action is an “unconstitutional illegal act,” to Glenn Beck‘s conclusion that “this is the most ‘America First’ thing I have ever seen,” it is understandable that many might interpret these contrasts as evidence of such ‘fragmentation,’ but it is not necessarily so.
For example, despite Beck’s joy over Trump’s America First action, he nevertheless acknowledges that the “strict constitutionalists are absolutely right.” And despite Barnes’ “strict constitutionalist” stance, he too acknowledges that an act can be “illegal and moral” or “legal and immoral” and applies the same standards to policies and laws.
Thus, the real differences of opinion (and seeming contradictions) originate within the context from which they are expressed (i.e., legal, moral, or pragmatic). But which is Right? Continue reading »
In the wake of the United States’ military operation in Venezuela—including the abduction of the murderous, communist, dictator Nicolás Maduro—Professor Salim Mansur of Western University and Robert Vaughan examine the profound ramifications. Domestically, the action raises serious questions about the U.S. Constitution, as only Congress holds the authority to declare war. Internationally, it appears to contravene established norms of international law.
Although the Trump administration’s conduct violated constitutional principles in principle, such actions are far from unprecedented. Every U.S. president since the end of World War II has engaged in military interventions without formal congressional declarations of war. Similarly, on the global stage, violations of international law by permanent members of the UN Security Council—endowed with veto power—have occurred repeatedly without effective consequences.
Our conversation underscores a troubling reality: the United States, often regarded as exceptional by various measures, operates beyond meaningful constraints of international law due to its veto in the Security Council. Likewise, the president appears increasingly unbound by the Constitution, given historical precedent and Congress’s consistent failure to assert its authority—often through tacit bipartisan acquiescence.
Both the U.S. Constitution and the United Nations framework have proven impotent when confronted with a president acting unilaterally in what he deems the best interest of American citizens.
In a recent interview with The New York Times, President Trump was asked whether any checks existed on his power on the world stage. He replied: “Yeah, there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop (me).” When pressed on international law, he added, “I don’t need international law. I’m not looking to hurt people.”
Some may view this stance as echoing President Truman’s famous motto, “The buck stops here”—an assertion of personal responsibility. Others, however, may interpret it as monarchical in character. As Salim noted in our conversation, “Donald Trump is not following in the footsteps of George Washington. Donald Trump is now the George III of America.”
History since World War II demonstrates that U.S. presidents have proven largely unstoppable in such matters, with American forces overwhelmingly dominant. As Salim also observes, “The cost of enforcement can only lead to further conflict—a conflict, especially in the age of nuclear weapons, that nobody can say how it will end.”
Comments Off on 946 – Culture shift—in high gear | with Rasheed Muhammad
Jan072026
The incredible speed with which cultures change and how that change has manifested itself in the zeitgeist of 2026 is the predominant theme of Robert Vaughan’s discussion with Rasheed Muhammad, host of the Red Pill Diaries. On this count, Robert laments that the positive conditions long associated with Western culture may never return.
In a political world that has increasingly embraced the dystopian ideology of Karl Marx and the evils of collectivism, conditions are ripe for “gangsters, psychopaths, sociopaths, thugs” and various corrupt interests to take control of the populace.
“Today begins a new era,” announced New York mayor Zohran Mamdani during his January 1 inauguration speech. “We will replace the frigidity of rugged individualism with the warmth of collectivism.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 945 – Tabula Rasa—a blank slate for a new year?
Dec312025
Just as a newborn child comes into this world in a state of tabula rasa, so too are all individuals in a similar state when it comes to what political and social events will transpire in 2026.
In addition to defining ‘tabula rasa’ as “the mind before it receives the impressions gained from experience,” the American Heritage Dictionary also defines the term as “a need or an opportunity to start from the beginning.”
In the spirit of making a New Year’s resolution, this might be a good time to consider starting the new year afresh with a blank slate that first acknowledges the true political polarity of Left and Right, before attempting to form alliances among those who use these labels in ways that confuse.
As the old saying goes: “Ain’t so much what people don’t know that gets them into trouble; it’s what they do know that just ain’t so.”
This speaks to a truth about both humanity’s strength and weakness when it comes to acquiring valid knowledge. It is always possible to be wrong. And being Right requires an accurate epistemology. Continue reading »
Robert Vaughan was interviewed by Rasheed Muhammad on The Red Pill Diaries on December 26.
With a formal background in psychology and as a political commentator for Just Right Media, Robert delved into a range of topics. He began with an examination of the psychological mindset of Western leaders, whom he characterized as morally corrupt, psychopathic, or sociopathic figures influenced by subjectivist philosophies derived from Karl Marx, the Frankfurt School, post-structuralism, and contemporary woke ideology.
He contrasted this with an objective view of reality and critiqued the leaders’ lack of self-reflection, empathy, or willingness to admit errors, attributing their behavior to a pursuit of power and corruption.
Later in the discussion, topics included media manipulation and state funding in Canada, the intentional dumbing down of education systems leading to societal decline, and the role of blackmail, cliques, and the deep state in perpetuating detrimental policies, such as support for Ukraine and neoconservative foreign interventions.
The dialogue also addressed the rapid cultural and moral decay in the West, disappointments with figures like Donald Trump, the influence of bureaucracy on presidents, and America’s historical shift toward global hegemony contrary to its founding principles.
The discussion concluded with an analysis of the rise of the Global South, China’s economic and technological ascendancy, the end of unipolar U.S. dominance, and optimism for a multipolar world focused on individual peace and flourishing rather than enforced domination.
Comments Off on 944 – Religion is culture—religion is politics
Dec242025
“Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is.”
With that statement, Mahatma Ghandi spoke to the reality that, effectively, religion ‘is’ politics.
The ‘religious forces’ behind much of the world’s social conditions – whether during times of peace or times of conflict – essentially frame the philosophy of a given culture, which in turn determines its zeitgeist of the time.
At a time of year when various religious celebrations are taking place, it cannot be ignored that in this season of peace on earth and good will towards men, Earth continues to be embroiled in conflict and war.
And as with political ideologies, religious beliefs can be identified in terms of a Left and Right polarity. In this context, the fundamental distinction concerns the contrast between a ‘culture of life’ on the Right (i.e., Christianity, Judaism) and the ‘death culture’ of the Left (i.e., Islam).
While religion clearly functions as a uniting force among its own adherents, it has also been a major divisive force whenever competing religions come into direct conflict. Whether in religion or politics, the values of Left and Right are incompatible and cannot co-exist.
Thus the path to a world in which there can be ‘peace on earth and good will towards men’ first requires an awareness of the polarized nature and relationship between culture, religion, and politics that is Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 943 – Intrinsically subjective—objectively speaking
Dec172025
“The belief that truth is purely subjective is a far greater threat than any other because that will strike at the core of our reasoning, and ultimately to our ability to choose between right and wrong,” asserted American politician and social media influencer Nick Freitas to a crowd of young Republicans at the University of California, Berkeley earlier this month. “I have never bought in to this truly ridiculous notion that truth is subjective.”
Subjectivism is the belief that reality is not a firm absolute, but something which can be altered by the consciousness of the perceiver. Objectivity is the only way to determine what is true, Freitas rightly argued. And on this point fellow Christians Matt Walsh and Tucker Carlson likewise asserted that objective truth exists and that we must agree that there ‘is’ a truth.
Unfortunately, when many Christians on the Right correctly assert that Truth can only be determined objectively, their definition of ‘objective’ is far from being so.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 942 – Color blinded—to racism’s color blind antidote
Dec102025
“Our country is at a tipping point,” recently warned U.S. president Donald Trump. “I don’t know if people mind me saying that, but we could go one way or the other – and we’re going to be going the wrong way if we keep taking garbage into our country. Ilhan Omar is garbage; her friends are garbage. They don’t go ‘let’s make this place great,’ they are people who do nothing but complain.”
One cannot help but notice how America’s immigration crisis is being debated and discussed in an increasingly aggressive and hostile manner, from America’s president right down to the average man on the street. Trump’s reference to an America flooded with ‘garbage’ people metaphorically reflects the reality of literal rivers of garbage associated with cultures whose people not only do not clean up their garbage, but live in it.
By equating criticism of other cultures with racism, the Left has effectively distracted everyone from the fact that ‘cultures’ are a product of human beliefs, actions and choices, whereas ‘race’ pertains to skin color and other physical characteristics not open to any moral or intellectual considerations. Most importantly, the Left has turned the racial divide into a false polarity, with people of white skin color on one side, and everyone else on the other. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 941 – Democratic dilemma: Is democracy just a fiction?
Dec032025
Democracy: Consent of the governed? Or government by consensus?
What most fail to realize is that these two views are incompatible. That’s because the principle of ‘consent’ rests on individual rights, while the principle of ‘consensus’ allows for the violation of individual rights.
These two very different concepts of ‘democracy’ have long been in conflict, resulting in a social condition that no longer seems ‘democratic.’ Consequently, many no longer feel that their governments represent them and they are actually questioning whether or not what most see as ‘democracy’ is a just a fiction.
One can argue that America is a constitutional republic and not a democracy, but this does not address the reality that it currently operates as neither, given its assumed mandate of protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Many voices on the Right have gone into a panic mode trying to resolve the nation’s democratic dilemma by offering many valid observations and insights into the symptoms of the problem. Unfortunately, they have offered few viable solutions to a cure, owing to a fundamental misunderstanding of what has assumed to be ‘democracy’.
Democracy, like government itself, should be limited in terms of elections and voting; voting should never be allowed to violate or infringe on the individual rights of others – and thereby also on their ability to consent.
Under the principle of ‘majority rule,’ no such limits exist. That’s why understanding democracy in a way that is Just Right first requires abandoning the foolish notion of ‘majority rule’ as a justification for the violation of individual rights.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 940 – Right wingers—from fragmentation to stagnation
Nov262025
It’s bad enough when those on the Right publicly exhibit internal ideological conflicts; it’s even worse when those conflicts become personal.
For example, says Ben Shapiro: “The fragmentation of the political right is caused purposely by a splinter faction led by Nick Fuentes. They’re white supremacists; they hate women, Jews, Christians, brown people, blacks, America’s foreign policy and constitution, and they admire Hitler and Stalin,” and “Tucker Carlson is an intellectual coward, a dishonest interlocutor, and a terrible friend.”
Says Mark Levin: “Tucker is a racist so, no, I don’t debate the Klan and I don’t debate Nazis.”
Says Tucker Carlson: “Mark Levin is full of hate. (He supports) killing kids because you don’t like their parents. He is describing blood guilt.”
You get the general idea – not exactly inspiring displays of reasoned debate or clearly defined principles. And these are but a few examples.
The concern has been raised as to whether or not the various conflicts between recognized voices of the ‘Right’ will cause a fragmentation on the Right serious enough to compromise the MAGA movement and its resistance to the Left.
Whether or not these conflicts will evolve from a minor right wing fragmentation to another major right wing stagnation is something impossible to predict.
But to suggest that these disagreements are being aired and debated in a way that is Just Right depends on whether one takes them seriously or just as comedic entertainment.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Thanks to the recent election of Zohran Mamdani as the City of New York’s ‘socialist’ mayor, there have been increasing alarms warning of a rise in ‘socialism’s popularity’ among a majority of America’s young people. However, this may be an overstatement.
While it is fair to say that there has been a rise in the number of socialist politicians getting elected, to attribute these electoral wins to any love of socialism is simply misguided. Why? Because the average ‘socialist voter’ has no concept of socialism, either in terms of its definition or in terms of its horrific history. They are voting ‘against’ something, not for it.
Socialism, as an understandable or relatable concept, has little or no relevance to most voters’ daily concerns and lives. To them, socialism is just some nebulous label that politicians use to belittle one another (even though they may all behave the same and pursue the same socialist policies).
In practice, socialism is the political application of the philosophy of egalitarianism. Socialist ‘equality’ does not mean ‘equality before and under the law’ – it means equity: the ‘equality’ of results. It means that those who work hard, take risks, and produce the goods, services, and products upon which a society’s survival depends, must be punished to the degree of their success, while those who do not fit into the productive class (for whatever reason) are to be rewarded by sharing in the products they had no part in creating. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 938 – The great escape—from Canada | Mark Vandermaas
Nov122025
“I’ve gone from being a patriotic Canadian to the point where I wouldn’t risk a hangnail for Canada,” laments our guest Mark Vandermaas. “Canada’s done. There is no political solution; there is no legal solution.”
A retired member of the Canadian armed forces, Mark’s experience as a Canadian activist included his being arrested for carrying a Canadian flag in public. This was perhaps an event symbolic of his ultimate decision to escape the tyranny in Canada and thus be able to say: “We love our life in Ecuador.”
In sharing his story of how he came to ultimately choose Ecuador as his destination, Mark’s narrative of events describing Canada’s descent into tyranny serve as a chilling reminder of just “how fast a supposedly civilized society can go off the rails.”
Referring to the Canada of today as a “grotesquely racist country,” whose national pass time has become “hating people,” Mark is convinced that Canada is not “fixable” and is doomed to collapse as a nation. Continue reading »
“When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another…” These immortal words from the Declaration of Independence heralded the birth of a great nation, forged in revolution against despotic rule. Today, however, one man has chosen a quieter path to freedom: relocating from Canada to Ecuador to escape the creeping shadow of political tyranny.
That is precisely what Mark Vandermaas and his wife did after life in Canada had grown unpredictably autocratic. Host, Robert Vaughan, likened his homeland to the Neverland of Peter Pan, where the Lost Boys remained children, perpetually stunted in their growth and maturity, unable to become responsible adults and forever treated like children by a paternalistic, stern, and stifling government.
Confronted by a relentless onslaught of encroachments upon their personal liberties—assaults that permeated the lives of every Canadian—they swiftly packed their belongings and departed for the serene, temperate elevations of that comparatively tranquil nation. They established their new home in the city of Cuenca, nestled high amid the majestic Andes Mountains.
In our discussion, we explore Mark’s activism in Canada, the pivotal decision he and his wife made to emigrate, and the striking contrasts in politics and culture between Canada and Ecuador.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider making a contribution:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 937 – No Canada? —an unconventional view
Nov052025
In December 2024, a documentary film entitled ‘Canada the Illusion’ was released on multiple on-line platforms with a descriptive: “This film is entirely based on facts and not on opinions.” Produced by Timm Stein in collaboration with Xander La Rue, Doug Force, and The Myth is Canada, the documentary delivers a painfully detailed legal and political history of how the nation known as Canada came into being. And then ceased to be.
Citing the Statute of Westminster (December 11, 1931) as the most important document defining the land mass known as Canada, the documentary concludes that from that point forward, the nation of Canada ceased to exist as a sovereign entity. The provinces, because they owned the land, became sovereign states unto themselves. Consequently, every piece of federal legislation passed after December 11, 1931 is invalid and lacks any authority to enforce it.
As implausible as this sounds (as it also did to the documentary’s producers), there appears to be no way to dispute this conclusion based on Canada’s legal and political history, documented at every step of the way. So how could it be that a nation called ‘Canada’ has carried on as such irrespective of its history and relevant laws? Continue reading »
Comments Off on 936 – Why Canada sucks—from tariffs to racism
Oct292025
In response to a political ad produced and distributed at a cost of $75 million by Ontario premier Doug Ford’s government, US president Donald Trump terminated all trade negotiations with the entire nation of Canada.
The ad, featuring former president Ronald Reagan speaking on the subject of tariffs (on April 25, 1987) was edited in such a way as to completely distort and misrepresent Reagan’s original comments in full context. It was an attempt by the Ford government to imply that Reagan and Trump held opposite views on tariffs and free trade, when in fact their stated views were identical.
Worse, as Trump observed, the release of the fraudulent ads occurred in conjunction with pending US supreme court decisions regarding a president’s authority to impose tariffs. This was the very issue originally addressed by Reagan when he gave his speech.
Why a provincial politician like Doug Ford would interfere in American politics is a question no doubt being considered by the Trump administration. Ford faces no immediate election prospects himself, though his government is planning to abandon the idea of fixed election periods altogether. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 935 – There’s no time like the future
Oct222025
As strange as it may seem, there are many cultures whose concept of ‘time’ literally do not include any recognition of a ‘future.’ While this may seem an innocuous and harmless notion, unfortunately it may be symptomatic of a dark cultural malaise.
Sounding an alarm about the danger this presents to Western culture, UK podcaster Connor Tomlinson recently warned that “we don’t understand how Africa thinks” and that “we don’t understand how the third world thinks.” In two separate presentations warning about the risks and dangers of immigration by people who fail to conceptualize any concept of a ‘future,’ his insights and analysis certainly do explain many behaviors and attitudes about such immigrants not previously understood.
Citing the African concepts of Sasa (Sasha) and Zamani as the two dimensions of time, he concludes that “we can’t have a civilization if people don’t think the future exists.”
Sasa is described by African philosophers as the “now, the recent past and the immediate future which can be experienced.” Zamani is the “vast endless past where all events eventually go on to live forever, but the ‘future’ in African thought barely exists.” Continue reading »
Comments Off on 934 – Identity politics—the multicultural monoculture
Oct152025
Identity politics has become a parody of itself, to the point where it has become a multicultural monoculture of irrationality based on collectivist anti-concepts.
The most obvious evidence of identity politics is the rise of racism, and because the racist Left has falsely trumpeted that label so loudly and for so long, it has not only lost its meaning, but has become increasingly dismissed by most people not on the Left.
This itself presents a danger because actual racism does exist; to simply dismiss the term entirely risks failing to see racism when it is practiced.
As Ayn Rand observed so many years ago: “Today, racism is regarded as a crime if practiced by a majority – but as an inalienable right if practiced by a minority.” Continue reading »
Comments Off on 933 – Eye witness—to a bloodless assassination?
Oct082025
“Don’t believe your own lying eyes,” has been a common response to visual ‘evidence’ used to create a narrative that simply doesn’t make sense. If ever there was a test of this bromide, it is the growing number of speculative accounts and ‘conspiracy theories’ surrounding the Charlie Kirk assassination.
Currently, the most alarming observation to surface is the reported lack of blood at the crime scene, something quite inconsistent with the visuals of blood seen streaming profusely from the neck of Charlie Kirk at the moment of his being shot. This has been observed and commented on by a variety of very different bloggers and podcasters, each with his/her own unique perspective and interpretation of what is being witnessed.
In this age of eye witness accounts, one must be extraordinarily cautious about what is accepted as the truth; discernment is the rule.
Given that revelations of past assassinations in American history continue to be released decades following the events themselves, it shouldn’t be surprising that the Kirk assassination has been viewed with a skepticism drawn from a deep distrust of those providing the official narratives.
Perhaps the most frustrating conclusion to draw from all of this is that when it comes to establishing an assassination narrative about Charlie Kirk that is Just Right, we might have to wait another six or more decades before something resembling the ‘truth’ surfaces.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 932 – Losers Lefting it—by just winging it
Oct012025
One reason that the political polarity remains unseen by so many is because when it comes to Left and Right, most people are just winging it.
In fact, they have been ‘winging’ it for so long that they are at last coming to realize that each political wing is not so different from the other. U.S. General Michael Flynn has called on Americans to stop playing “this political two-party game” which, of course, was a sarcastic reference to what has been called a ‘Uniparty.’
But the only way to stop playing the ‘Uniparty’ game is to stop ‘winging it’ in the political arena. What is required is a two party polarity, not party wings. That’s because Left ‘wing’ and Right ‘wing’ are not so different from each other. Instead of representing individual rights and justice, each ‘wing’ represents a different interest group.
Traditionally, Left-wing groups restrict economic choices, limit trade and monopolize labor, while Right-wing groups restrict personal choices, control trade, and monopolize business. Those who claim to be ‘middle-of-the-road’ simply do both, and the ‘road’ all of them are on leads directly to the polarity of the Left. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 931 – Turning Right—by awakening to the Left
Sep242025
The Left is in a frenzy trying to associate the assassination of Charlie Kirk with the Right, an impossibility given the evidence. But facts and evidence have never mattered to those on the Left.
Finding himself in the middle of the frenzy, late-night show host Jimmy Kimmel was briefly suspended by ABC due to his political commentary (masquerading as comedy) claiming that Kirk was assassinated by the MAGA Right. Unfortunately for Kimmel, there was no evidence to justify this and a mountain of confirmed evidence pointing to the Left.
Attempting to portray the Left as the side against violence, many are now trying to talk ‘unity’ and walk back some of the hateful Leftist reactions to Kirk’s assassination, including Barack Hussein Obama.
In his recent fake condemnation of those who support the violence, he announced: “Let the record say that on both sides undoubtedly there are people who are extremists and who say things that are contrary to what I believe are America’s core values.”Continue reading »
Comments Off on 930 – The Charlie Kirk turning point—from ballots to bullets
Sep172025
Last week’s assassination of Charlie Kirk sent a shock wave across the world that exposed the political polarities of Left and Right on a scale never before experienced.
An American political activist on the Right, Kirk founded the conservative organization Turning Point USA and was its executive director until his untimely demise on the Utah Valley University campus on September 10.
While the tragedy of Charlie Kirk’s murder is its own horror story, a greater horror story has been the reaction of those on the Left who have celebrated his murder with calls for even more murders, including those of Kirk’s wife and children.
This has presented those on the Right with a moral dilemma: how to oppose the Left without having to resort to violence. Unlike the Right, the Left does not honor the ballot box; it worships the bullet. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 929 – Anti-capitalists—lazy envious losers
Sep102025
If calling anti-capitalists lazy envious losers sounds a bit harsh, the reality is that these descriptions are nowhere near harsh enough.
You have to hear it for yourself to understand why, and thanks to Patrick Bet-David’s August 31 Jubilee production, “One Capitalist versus 20 Anti-Capitalists,” you can. It has stirred a storm of controversy by exposing what anti-capitalists think and say – in their own words – that make them often sound as if they have yet to emerge from the womb.
“It’s such a horrible dystopian world to live in if someone has to work just to survive,” emotionally protested one participant. Another declared that “life liberty and the pursuit of happiness shouldn’t have to be earned. We just want to exist.”
Of course, the reality is that they “just want to exist” at the expense of others, who never even once are considered in their deranged ideals. In justifying their hatred of capitalism, the ‘anti-capitalists’ all shared a common fear, expressed as “either I work or I die.” Continue reading »
Comments Off on 928 – Shooting blind—at shooter motives
Sep032025
Given the alarming number of recent mass shootings, have we been shooting blind in our own analysis of these shooters’ motives?
In attempting to zero in on the underlying cause of these once unheard-of events, one is faced with an overwhelming array of symptoms, explanations and suggested solutions.
In addition to the mass shootings at religious functions and institutions themselves, these include: mental health disorders; gender dysphoria; anti-depressant drugs; SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors); guns and weapons; law enforcement; ‘safety’ laws and regulations; sexual dysfunctions; cognitive dysfunctions; atheism; Covid experimental gene therapies; Christianity; private property rights; the right to self defense; government disinformation and misinformation; medical malpractice and disinformation; thought disorders of faulty thinking; castle laws; state protection rackets; anarcho-tyranny; the right to bear arms.
While many of these concerns may seem unrelated, when one steps back for the ‘big picture’ view, what is particularly alarming is how so-called ‘big pharma’ in conjunction with intelligence agencies seem to have played a central role in the tragedies – in particular with regard to the use of drugs classified as SSRIs.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 927 – When objective isn’t—there’s Objectivism
Aug272025
Sad to say, the vast majority of people do not take philosophy seriously, even though they are helplessly in its grip. It is understandable that with with all of the competing ideologies and perspectives on the nature and purpose of human life, philosophy is seen by many simply as another religion without the element of deity – a subjective secular belief system.
Enter philosopher-novelist Ayn Rand, whose philosophy of Objectivism has a name that specifically refutes the subjective, and who since having arrived on America’s philosophical frontier, established a reputation unlike that of any other philosopher. She self-identified as being on the Right, which she associated with freedom and capitalism.
But there are many others who self-identify as being on the Right, who completely reject Ayn Rand’s philosophy, not because of its principles which they rarely mention, but because of its messenger.
“Ayn Rand is a modernist atheist radical individualist; what about that is conservative?” asked the Daily Wire’s Michael Knowles on his April 4 podcast during which he ranked the greatest philosophers.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 926 – Official Dumb-and the incompetence of state regulation
Aug202025
The ridiculous fine of $28,870.50 levied against Nova Scotia resident Jeff Evely is a classic example of officialdom hard at work.
The Cambridge English Dictionary defines ‘officialdom’ as a noun referring to “the people who have a position of authority, especially in government, often when they are preventing or slowing you from doing something.”
In this case, officialdom is preventing people from taking a walk in the woods on their own property – revealing officialdom to be official dumb. Perusing a handful of on-line dictionaries, the word ‘dumb’ is described as: “lacking the power of speech; used of animals and inanimate objects; lacking intelligence or good judgment; stupid; dull-witted.”
All of these terms seem to apply to the likes of Newfoundland’s premier John Hogan and New Brunswick’s premier Tim Houston whose continually changing justifications for the draconian fines and penalties border on the insane: Continue reading »
Comments Off on 925 – The Majority Rule: The majority is never Right
Aug132025
Earlier in democracy’s history, its operative principle was not considered to be ‘majority rule,’ but instead, ‘majority government.’ This expressed the idea that only those who had reached the ‘age of majority’ should be eligible to vote and participate in government. It was an age at which a person became a self-responsible adult, capable of exercising informed consent, and otherwise could be held responsible for his/ her actions.
In a free democracy, no one ‘rules’ anyone else. But in a democracy based on ‘majority rule,’ that principle no longer holds true.
The Left views ‘democracy’ as a system of ‘majority rule’ under which the winning group is given the legal authority to rule over other groups and individuals, all justified on the grounds of having achieved some kind of ‘majority.’
The Right views democracy as a system of governance in which no one can ‘vote’ to infringe upon anyone else’s right to Life Liberty and Property. Voting is restricted to matters of governance (justice, military, police, etc.) outside of the private sphere of activity. This would constitute majority government as opposed to majority rule. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 924 – Jean therapy—against the WOKE virus
Aug062025
Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle blue jeans ad has proven to be a ‘jean therapy’ against the WOKE virus. But is it a cure?
The literally insane reactions to the ad by a myriad of women saying that they are objecting to ‘eugenics’ was both laughable and tragic. Calling upon vague and contrived associations with Hitler, their objections were justified using terms and arguments like the following:
“Sweeney has great genes; she’s a Nazi; she’s fascist; she’s a racist; she owns a German shepherd as her dog whistle; her initials spell ‘SS’; she has white skin, blue eyes and blue jeans; American Eagle is promoting fascist propaganda, Christian nationalism and white supremacy; Sweeney is Hitler’s wet dream; cotton jeans are racist; American Eagle is reviving the Third Reich; Sweeney represents white supremacist patriarchy capitalistic beauty standards; the ads portray fascist aesthetics; the script is bigoted BS,” and much much more. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 923 – The Obama bombshell—and the call for accountability
Jul302025
In the wake of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s bombshell report regarding former U.S. President Barrack Hussein Obama’s traitorous actions against the United States of America and its citizens, there are many voices calling for some kind of serious and real accountability. But in the absence of any such accountability over past political actions that were demonstrably harmful and destructive to the lives of Americans, it is understandable that many remain skeptical about such a possibility.
But the elusiveness of achieving ‘accountability’ in government may be the consequence of deeper forces beyond any individual’s direct control. Unfortunately, in a democracy governed with the ‘consent of the governed,’ the difficulty in holding individual politicians ‘accountable’ for their political actions is an unavoidable part of the democratic process itself. After all, the usual way for politicians to be held ‘accountable’ for their political shortcomings has simply been by losing elections.
So maybe the real story here is not just about Obama’s traitorous actions, but also about how and why so many Americans – supposedly citizens of a free society – either could not see Obama’s anti-Americanism, or worse, openly supported it. So who’s really accountable?
When Obama first became president in 2008, it was glaringly clear that he was no friend of America. Calling upon Americans to “summon a new spirit of service,” his collectivist philosophy became much more explicit in his second term, when during his January 2013 inaugural speech he announced that “preserving our individual freedom requires collective action.”Continue reading »
Comments Off on 922 – Third Party politics: Two’s company, Three’s a democracy
Jul232025
In the wake of Elon Musk’s recent formation of a ‘third’ political party in America – the America Party – many on the Right have viewed this development as a direct threat to Donald Trump’s MAGA movement, while others view it as a potential opportunity for the MAGA movement.
Though there are many more than three political parties in America, it is interesting to note that they are all referred to as ‘third parties.’ Indeed, the very term ‘third party politics’ is both illusionary and ironic, given that it is based on an unspoken acknowledgement that such parties exist within an accepted binary framework of a two party polarity.
But given that the two party electoral option is now being recognized as a single ‘uniparty’ non-option, another controversy has arisen. Some are now arguing that political parties no longer serve a useful function at all, while others maintain that political parties are an essential part of any democratic process.
To complicate matters further, within the second group there is a further division over whether there should only be two parties in opposition to each other, or whether multiple ‘third’ parties have a place in the democratic process. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 921 – The erotic side of human sexuality
Jul162025
Recent studies and surveys concerning human sexual behavior are emerging with data possibly uncomfortable to some, while reassuring to others.
Some studies point to trends revealing that young people today are having less sex than those of previous generations. Additional statistics reveal that more people today than ever are regular consumers of pornography.
But the biggest surprise of all is that women have become a significant percentage of visitors to adult porn sites like PornHub, and that their arousal patterns are very different from that of men, in a way not commonly understood. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 920 – The artificial debate about Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Jul092025
It’s interesting to observe how words like ‘intelligent’ and ‘smart’ are being used to describe devices that are anything but.
There is no doubt that technological advancements have produced machines and computer programs that appear to behave or respond ‘intelligently,’ and the speed with which computers can calculate, compute, and otherwise perform ‘automated’ physical functions is far more efficient than what is ‘humanly’ possible. We have come to refer to these inventions broadly as Artificial Intelligence (AI).
But efficiency alone is not a measure of intelligence. Like shovels, hammers and electrical appliances, computers are just tools. And while all tools are more efficient than direct human physical effort, tools are nevertheless an extension of human intelligence. They are labor saving devices which save effort, something no machine could ever experience.
As a tool, AI is not to be feared, but embraced as such. However, there is a great danger in equating ‘artificial’ intelligence with human intelligence or reason.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 919 – The defining point: EVIL is LIVE spelled backwards
Jul022025
There is a symbolic truth to the saying that ‘EVIL is LIVE spelled backwards.’ After all, the defining point of ‘evil’ concerns life itself.
But ‘evil’, like ‘good’, is an abstract concept. Being able to see and recognize evil when one encounters it often seems even more difficult than trying to define it.
The most popular form of evil is generally known by another name: socialism. That too few are able to equate socialism with evil is cause for concern, to say the least. But that so many equate socialism with the good is cause for outright alarm.
Dennis Prager of PragerU has advised that “wisdom begins with understanding that human nature is not basically good, nor evil.” In choosing socialism, most do not understand either the principles of socialism itself, nor the nature of the evil that makes socialism possible.
Thus it is essential to listen to the growing number of people who have lived and suffered under socialism now coming forward to sound the alarm. To that end we have recently featured accounts of how socialism manifested itself in countries like North Korea, Senegal, Venezuela, and Iran. As Venezuelan immigrant Daniel Di Martino describes his personal mission: “I decided to educate Americans on the horrors of socialism.”
People who have freedom tend to take it for granted. But the fragility of freedom can never be overstated. Sometimes, to see and appreciate what one has at hand, it is necessary to look beyond, to appreciate what those in other nations do not have and wish they did.
It’s called freedom and it’s found exclusively on the political polarity that’s Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 918 – The trans political language barrier—Left and Right
Jun252025
Missing from most discussions about the political Left and Right are any consistent and accurate definitions of each polarity in terms of its principles. As a consequence, confusion reigns – a condition that benefits the Left and handicaps the Right.
So here, in no particular order, are but a few examples of proper associations with Left and Right:
LEFT ——————————————————— RIGHT
Plato ———————————————————- Aristotle
Primacy of Consciousness ———– Primacy of Existence
Unreality —————————————————- Reality
Ignorance ——————————————– Knowledge
Fake ————————————————————- Real
Tyranny ————————————————— Freedom
Death ————————————————————- Life
Evil ————————————————————- Good
Sinister ————————————————— Dexterous
Irrational ————————————————– Rational
Immorality ———————————————— Morality
Subjective / Intrinsic ——————————— Objective
Confusion ————————————— Understanding
Intolerance ——————————- Tolerance / Respect
Karl Marx ———————————————– Ayn Rand
Collectivism ————————————– Individualism
Consensus ———————————————- Consent
Slavery ————————————————- Capitalism
Socialism, Communism, Fascism ————- Capitalism
Utopia / Perfection —————————————– Ideal
Collective Authority ———— Individual Responsibility
Sacrificial Altruism ——————- Rational Self Interest
Concrete bound thought —————- Abstract thinking
Destiny / Determinism —————— Choice / Free Will
State Ownership/Control —————– Private Property
Equity —————————————————— Equality
Majority Rule —————————————- Democracy
Government as Player ———- Government as Referee
Group ‘Rights’ ——————————- Individual Rights
Coercive ————————————————- Voluntary
Coercion ——————————————– Voluntarism
The Rule of Men —————————– The Rule of Law
Censorship ——————————- Freedom of Speech
Initiatory Force ————– Defensive/Retaliatory Force
Ends justify means —– Ends and means are the same
Might is Right ———————————— Right is Might
Disorder and Chaos —————— Order and Symmetry
Envy ——————————————————— Pride
Unearned ———————————————— Earned
Emotions / Feelings ——————— Reason / Thinking
State education —————————- Private Education
Controlled Minds ———————————– Free Minds
Controlled Markets —————————— Free Markets
Political Wings ————————— No Wing (Knowing)
Falsehoods and Lies ———————— Facts and Truth
Faith ———————————————————- Reason
Force ————————————————— Persuasion
Social Justice ——————————– Individual Justice
Incompetence ————————————- Competence
Consumption —————————————- Production
‘Fixed Pie’ Theory —————- ‘Bake A Pie’ Philosophy
Wealth Destruction ————————- Wealth Creation
Theft ———————————————————– Trade
Poverty ————————————————– Prosperity
Fear ———————————————————– Love
Can there be any doubt about why we should always choose what is Just Right?
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 917 – WOKE joke—the fallacy of the WOKE Right
Jun182025
By inventing the term ‘WOKE Right’, author, mathematician and cultural critic James Lindsay has created a nonsensical anti-concept that has done more damage to causes on the Right than any fake news media could. Fake concepts are far more dangerous than fake news narratives.
In the intellectual confusion surrounding political concepts, it should not be surprising that many on the Right have come to both accept – and fear – being labeled ‘WOKE.’ But the joke is on them, and it was made possible by yet another political fiction called the ‘political spectrum.’
The ‘political spectrum’ was perhaps the most brilliant and effective propaganda victory that the Left ever created. Following the political maxim of ‘define or be defined,’ the Left succeeded in defining the Right as simply another variant of the Left – fascist instead of communist or socialist.
Lindsay has mischievously created the concept of WOKE Right in such a convoluted way as to make any objective understanding of either word impossible. Worse, the concept of ‘WOKE’ serves no useful purpose as an adjective. The term ‘WOKE Right’ is a contradiction. The term ‘WOKE Left’ is redundant.Continue reading »
In speaking truth to tyranny, it is necessary to expose both the immorality and historical record of socialism, its most widely recognized cause.
Despite its destructive consequences, the popularity of socialism persists, and this does not bode well for those who adopt socialism. As Senegal’s Magatte Wade illustrates, Africa’s poverty and tyranny are a direct consequence of “the deadly ideology of socialism,” an ideology also being practiced in Canada.
In fact, Canada’s recent political history provides a testimony to the tyranny caused by socialism, a tyranny not so unlike that which has been experienced in Africa.
The Freedom Convoy in 2022 provided both a literal and symbolic example of just how far from a free democracy Canada had drifted. Peacefully organized to oppose COVID-19 vaccine mandates along with all COVID-19 restrictions and lockdowns, the Canadian government responded to the convoy and other protestors with force.Continue reading »
‘Veritas’ is the Latin word for ‘truth’ and is also the name of a Roman goddess who represents truthfulness and virtue. One individual well known for having his name associated with this word is James O’Keefe, founder of Project Veritas.
His expressed experience after having been ‘fired’ from his own organization reflects certain principles in common with politics, as recently illustrated by seemingly unrelated accounts of life in North Korea today and life during the fall of the Roman Empire.
In speaking truth to freedom, all of these accounts cite the reality that truth itself – veritas – is a key value and virtue upon which any free society depends. Is it any wonder then that unfree collectivist societies and globalists fear the truth more than almost anything else on the planet?
The eternal fundamental political struggle represented by the political polarities of Left and Right is that between collectivism and individualism. To the degree that a society is collectivist, its citizens have less freedom and less prosperity. To the degree that a society is individualist, both freedom and prosperity are the result. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 914 – What’s so funny?—just about everything
May282025
What’s so funny? What’s ‘funny’ can be something that causes us to laugh or be amused, or it can also refer to something that is peculiar, strange, or odd. That’s probably why just about all things and people have something that could be said to be ‘funny’ about them.
We live in an age when it has become difficult to satirize the actions of many of the world’s politicians and political activists. They have become so ridiculous and disconnected from reality that any such attempt is impossible to make funnier than the object of the satire already is.
So to take a break from all of the not-so-‘funny’ things going on in the world today, let’s take a look at humor in its various basic forms, from the popular appeal of simple ‘groaners,’ riddles and jokes, to the fascination with dark humor and historical events.
From the amusing to the peculiar, traditional humor still has a broad appeal for many. After all, a sense of humor is an essential part of common sense. That’s why there’s no one way to look at comedy or humor that’s Just Right, especially when it’s funny.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 913 – The epistemology of God—and the debate over nothing
May212025
Whether theist or atheist, both sides of the debate usually share the same logical fallacy – the fallacy of non-existence. On that premise, science invented the ‘big bang’ theory while religion invented the ‘creation’ narrative.
At the heart of the dilemma lies the attempt to resolve a philosophical issue (the nature and fact of existence) by means other than philosophy. Neither science nor faith alone are capable of addressing such an issue.
The flaw in most of the ‘creation of the universe’ theories and beliefs is that they presume that there was once a condition of ‘non-existence’ out of which arose existence itself. It is not even possible to conceptualize a condition described as ‘non-existence’ and with good reason; any attempt to do so is contradictory.
To suggest that ‘nothing exists’ or or to refer to the ‘existence of non-existence’ is self contradictory and therefore meaningless. Yet from science to religion, we see an acceptance of the ‘existence of non existence’ as if that was some kind of valid premise on which to base any theories or beliefs.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 912 – Monsters to destroy—for the neocon agenda
May142025
“On July 4, 1821, John Quincy Adams delivered the most-remembered speech of his career. The oration’s resounding climax included several famous lines – that America ‘goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy,’ for example, and that an America that aspired to world leadership, even in the name of noble ideas, would be led astray: ‘She might become the dictatress of the world. She would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit.’ Even as American foreign policy has warped in many of the ways Adams foresaw, it has been unable to bury his powerful words.” (-from the ‘John Quincy Adams Society’ website)
It is in this light that controversial issues like America’s foreign policy, the war in Ukraine, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, globalism, a one world government, and significantly – Zionism and the neocon movement – are now being discussed. Complicating the discussion is the constant matter of definition and context.
“Narratives are built by removing history,” observes Salim Mansur, so as to “serve the interest of whoever you are advocating for.”
Not surprisingly, with the re-introduction of the relevant history into the narrative, one soon discovers that the narrative often changes radically, rarely serving the narrow interests of those promoting the original. Continue reading »
In the third installment of our discussion on neoconservatism, Professor Salim Mansur examines the post-Soviet era, a period marked by complex dynamics and post-Cold War tensions. Rather than embracing Russia as a potential ally and a nascent democracy recovering from decades of communism and autocratic rule, the United States eventually came to cast it as a new “monster to destroy.”
This shift undermined America’s founding principle of rational isolationism with limited international engagement as it sought to maintain hegemony in an emerging multipolar world. The pivot fueled hostility both domestically and internationally, channeling billions into the military-industrial complex and perpetuating endless conflict.
Central to this narrative is the unwavering defense of Israel, which, alongside the focus on Russia, shapes American foreign policy. Crafted by neoconservatives and embraced by hawks across administrations since George H. W. Bush, this dual focus has defined U.S. global strategy. The neoconservative agenda, explicitly outlined in the Project for the New American Century (1997), drove NATO expansion and heightened tensions in the Middle East.
Ultimately, neoconservatism has betrayed America’s early ideals, costing countless lives, squandering vast fortunes, and tarnishing the reputation of a once-great nation.
(This video presentation is also available on YouTube.)
If you enjoyed this presentation please consider offering your financial support:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 911 – The minority report—Canada’s democracy inaction
May072025
On the heels of a Canadian election that both started and ended with a minority Liberal government, the term ‘democracy inaction’ takes on a new meaning.
Unfortunately, also on the heels of the Canadian election, evidence is beginning to surface that Canada’s electoral system is corrupt and that the 2025 election was rigged in numerous and subtle ways.
In a riding he held for many years, Pierre Poilievre, despite leading his Conservative Party to its best performance in decades, nevertheless lost his own seat in the riding of Carleton. And while criticizing Poilievre on campaign strategies and policies that may have hurt him is fair comment, holding him responsible for the loss of his own seat is not.
For example, Poilievre’s 2025 ballot contained 91 ‘candidates’ names and in the upcoming Alberta byelection in which he expects to regain a seat in parliament, a lobby group calling itself the ‘Longest Ballot Committee’ plans to add over 200 names to the byelection ballot. While this presents more of an inconvenience to voters than to Poilievre, the mere fact that Elections Canada permits such open and obvious manipulation of the ballot speaks to a deep systemic corruption within Canada’s entire electoral system.
Worse, the riding of Carleton, which Poilievre held for many years, was a different riding during previous elections. However, shortly before the 2025 election, Poilievre’s riding was gerrymandered to include a huge additional political jurisdiction consisting of a solid majority of Liberal voters.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 910 – Future shock—the science and politics of the coming era
Apr302025
It appears that the ‘future’ is not so much ahead of us, as behind us, given emerging accounts of advanced technologies far beyond our average daily experience.
Now that the White House has officially acknowledged these technologies, it is becoming increasingly clear why Donald Trump’s creation of a Space Force during his first presidency was critical to his greater agenda – and to the lives of every individual on this planet.
Increasingly, more and more accounts are surfacing regarding what might be regarded as quantum leaps in technology, so much so, that most who first hear about these technologies cannot bring themselves to believe it. As physicist Ashton Forbes expressed it, they are collectively choosing to remain in a state of “wilful ignorance.”
The disbelief is understandable. The technologies being described include everything from ‘anti-gravity’ propulsion to unlimited ‘free energy,’ to a complete command of inter-planetary space travel. The obvious question that arises is, why haven’t these technologies, purportedly around for many decades, not become part of our common experience? Continue reading »
Comments Off on 908 – Trump’s tariff trials—verdicts pending
Apr162025
Will Trump’s tariff strategies to make America great again actually work, or is Trump just becoming another global protectionist? That’s been the great debate since ‘liberation day’ when the tariffs took effect.
Interestingly, it’s a debate that seems to be conducted within the ranks of those generally seen to be on the Right.
But the real debate may be the nature of the debate itself. For some, the debate over tariffs is strictly economic; for others, political. For Trump, it appears to be both.
For Trump, the use of tariffs is neither an end in itself, nor is it being done in a vacuum. Accompanied by a myriad of economic reforms and regulation reductions, perhaps the most significant positive impact on Americans will be Trump’s elimination of the income tax – an issue closely linked to tariffs and trade duties.
Unfortunately, it appears that there continue to be many long accepted myths circulating about the impact of tariffs, including an almost complete lack of knowledge about the actual history of tariffs.
Similarly, there continue to be many myths in circulation about Trump himself, particularly with regard to his economic agenda – for free trade.
Is it possible that tariffs, which by their nature impede trade, can actually be a means to establish free trade? Trump seems to think so. Whether he proves to be Just Right will be a determination for the future, after the verdicts currently pending are finally rendered.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 907 – Anti-feminine isms—and the destruction of femininity
Apr092025
Dictionaries define ‘femininity’ as: “(1) the quality or nature of the female sex; womanliness; (2) the female form; (3) the sum of all attributes that convey (or are perceived to convey) womanhood.”
So whatever happened to femininity as a social value? Perhaps that question was already answered over a century ago. It would be difficult to believe that when British writer Arabella Kenealy published her book Feminism and Sex-Extinction in 1920, she could possibly have envisaged the 2025 dystopian reality of her predictions.
“Feminism, the extremist – and of late years the predominant cult of the Woman’s Movement, is Masculinism,” she asserted.
“It makes for such training and development in woman, of male characteristics, as shall equip her to compete with the male in every department of life; academic, athletic, professional, political, industrial. And it neither recognises nor admits in her natural aptitudes differing from those of men, and fitting her, accordingly, for different functions in these. It rejects all concessions to her womanhood; even to her mother-function. It repudiates all privileges for her. Boldly it demands a fair field only and no favour; equal rights, political and social, identical education and training, identical economic opportunities and avocations, an identical morale, personal and public.
“(The Feminist Creed) calls for the elimination of sex differences and the abolition of sex distinctions in every department of life and activity.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 906 – “Don’t label me!”—behind the political identity crisis
Apr022025
In the world of politics the first rule is “Define, or be defined” and political victories are won by those who do the defining. Critical to the political definition game is the use of labels, most significantly, the terms ‘Left’ and ‘Right.’
Over the past few years, a pattern is developing in which more and more people who previously identified themselves as ‘left wing’ or ‘moderate’ are surprisingly finding themselves being labeled ‘right wing’ without really understanding why.
Citing their support for freedom of speech, bodily autonomy, an end to foreign wars, and other philosophically-aligned-with-freedom issues, they express regret that the Left has ‘abandoned’ these values and that these values are now being espoused by the Right.
However, their description of this process as a ‘re-alignment’ of the political Left and Right is incorrect. What is actually happening is an awakening to the true nature of Left and Right. The Left has long represented the ideology of tyranny in all its forms, while the Right has represented the ideology of freedom. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 905 – The PPC vs the PPC—the People’s Party of Canada versus the People Problem in Canada
Mar262025
In this 2025 Canadian election, Maxime Bernier and the People’s Party of Canada have been entirely ‘Left’ out of the picture by the media. What’s surprising is that there are a significant number of people on the ‘Right’ who would also like to see Bernier left out of the picture. Most call themselves ‘conservatives.’
Apparently, Bernier and the PPC represent some kind of threat to both groups.
Suffering from political derangement syndromes like the myths of ‘splitting the vote,’ or the ‘wasted vote’ delusion, this latter group of voters who see themselves on the Right comprise a major part of what can best be termed as the ‘People Problem in Canada.’
Steeped in sheer ignorance, this group can best be seen as NPCs, ‘non-player-characters’, the mindless zombies who are reacting to a false stimulus (like a fear of Mark Carney), instead of acting on reason or principle.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 904 – So where’s the party?—on the Left or Right?
Mar192025
Having witnessed the political party machinations in Canada on both the provincial and federal level, it should not be surprising that there have been calls to reduce the influence of political parties.
Operating on the principles of a British parliamentary system, Ontario’s Doug Ford, after having won a two-week February snap election called on a whim, has since made an utter fool of himself attempting to beat US president Donald Trump in a tariff war. Meanwhile, Mark Carney, now Canada’s Prime Minister, was never elected to office and is an open advocate of globalism and an opponent of Canadian sovereignty.
With only 19% of Ontario’s eligible voters giving Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservative Party a majority government, and with zero voters on the federal level having elected Mark Carney, some might be asking whatever happened to the ‘democratic’ principle of ‘we the people’?
In Canada, there is one federal party that has addressed this question head-on in its very name: the People’s Party of Canada (PPC) under the leadership of Maxime Bernier. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 903 – The third choice—putting our own house in order | Major Russ Cooper
Mar122025
In the wake of a growing Canadian tyranny confronted by US president Trump’s tariff threats, Canadians have three choices, argues our guest Major Russ Cooper (retired): (1) Go American, (2) Go with the British empire, or (3) Go it on their own. He favors the third choice, beginning with the task of putting our own house in order – “taking what we have and making it what we want.”
Given Trump’s musings about Canada becoming a 51st state, it might surprise most Canadians and Americans alike just how complicated and time consuming the actual process of becoming a state is. That complexity and time frame would critically weaken any power that Canada might have in any negotiations warns Russ. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 902 – Speaking his own mind—for the People’s Party of Canada | Peyman Askari
Mar052025
Fresh on the heels of Ontario’s hit-and-run provincial election, Canadians are now preparing for a federal election in which the major contenders are expected to be the Liberal Party’s Mark Carney and the Conservative Party’s Pierre Poilievre.
Both support Canada’s involvement in the Ukraine war, the ideology of climate change, and getting into a trade war with America. Each party supported the recent mandatory Covid lockdowns and injections; each party continues to support various trade restrictions and monopolies within the country. And so much more.
So where can Canadian voters turn for a political option that does not force them to fund and support these unconscionable and irrational policies? In Canada there is one clear choice: the People’s Party of Canada, which under the leadership of Maxime Bernier and his army of PPC candidates, is bringing that choice to ridings across Canada.
One such candidate is our guest Peyman Askari, whose personal journey from what he calls a “Leftist cult” eventually steered him towards the People’s Party of Canada. In sharing his story, Peyman speaks freely about his own observations regarding the state of politics in Canada.
Though low in the polls during its early history, a new political party like the PPC must stand at the ready, says Peyman. It must “always be on the starting line… to take advantage of unpredictable white swan events.”
On the contentious matter of becoming a 51st state, Peyman suggests that this would not be a good idea for Canada: “We have to get there on our own.”
As a 51st state, Canadians would be spared the effort of gaining any new found freedoms, and so would never value their freedom in the same way that those who fought for freedom do. As an entitlement, freedom is little appreciated. As a value, freedom is cherished and becomes the defining point of a nation’s culture.
That’s why for Canadians, ‘earning’ their freedom is how to do it in a way that is Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Justin Trudeau has claimed that “there is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada” and that Canada is the world’s “first post-national state.” This, of course, was wishful thinking on the part of the Liberal Prime Minister, who also claimed that “Canada works better when there are Quebecers running it because we’ve got a sense of the whole country.” This inflated sense of importance and narcissistic attitude contradicts Canada’s long history of Western, primarily British, values of classical liberalism.
Trudeau’s attempt to undermine Canadian culture is seen by some as part of broader efforts by globalists and socialists like him who seek to erode our history and spirit. Some Canadians, repulsed by such efforts, have banded together to reclaim Canada’s proud heritage as a country that respected individual rights and fostered economic prosperity. One such organization is Canadian Citizens for Charter Rights and Freedoms (C3RF), co-founded and presided over by Major Russ Cooper (Ret’d).
Major Cooper joins Robert Vaughan to discuss the perceived decline in Canadian pride since the rise of the Trudeau regime and how we can reclaim the strong sense of culture we once had.
A distinctive feature of the People’s Party of Canada is the freedom its leader, Maxime Bernier, grants his candidates to express themselves. Unlike other federal Canadian parties, which tightly control their candidates by prohibiting press interactions and, in some cases, even barring participation in all-candidates debates out of fear of missteps that could embarrass the party or its leader, Bernier takes a different approach. He encourages his candidates to openly share their personal views in public forums, trusting them to address issues important to Canadians with honesty and authenticity.
Joining Robert Vaughan is PPC candidate Peyman Askari, who not only speaks candidly about topics that interest him but also actively engages with fellow Canadians on matters they care about most. Through his video platform, “In Lay Terms,” he has produced 160 discussions to date. Peyman represents the PPC in the riding of West Vancouver–Sunshine Coast–Sea to Sky Country.
There’s more to all the talk about Canada becoming a 51st state of America than most people suspect; Canada’s demise is self-inflicted, and on its current path, is inevitable.
Whether or not one believes that Canada’s becoming a 51st state of America is a serious proposition, the underlying realities that make it possible to even entertain such a discussion do not bode well for Canada.
The survival of Canada as a nation has long been dubious. Between Canada’s Western provinces and the province of Quebec, separation from the rest of Canada has always been threatened. Why? Because the federal government had in some way interfered with the promised jurisdictional authority of the provinces.
Worse, Canadians themselves have long self-defined as ‘not’ being American, a rather meaningless identity given that citizens of all nations outside the United States are also not American. Canadians in general are ignorant of their country’s history and unaware of the nature of its government. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 900 – Ontario’s hit-and-run election—driven by a Ford | Paul McKeever
Feb192025
In a discussion that transcends its provincial boundaries, Freedom Party of Ontario leader Paul McKeever once again joins us to discuss some uncomfortable truths about voters and the democratic process itself.
“It’s a dark time in Ontario,” says Paul, in anticipation of a new round of ’emergency’ declarations following Ontario’s February 27 snap election, both on the provincial and federal levels. But never has there been such a glaringly anti-democratic Ontario election as the current hit-and-run election driven by a Ford: Doug Ford, the Premier of Ontario.
In Ontario, the electoral process has become entirely corrupt. Early voting is both permitted and encouraged even before nominations are closed and candidates have been selected. Ford has demonstrated that general elections can be called on a whim, in contravention of the Election Statute Law Amendment Act, 2004. Elections Ontario, which administers Ontario elections and regulates officially-registered political parties, has in the past refused to place a fully-qualified and nominated Freedom Party candidate on the ballot in his riding. Again, rules don’t matter.
Our review of election feedback received by Freedom Party since the dropping of the writ on January 29 demonstrates that most voters, lobby groups, and the media are completely disconnected from any issues relevant to Ontario provincial politics. Even Doug Ford, in threatening to restrict trade and impose tariffs on America, is oblivious to the fact that such actions are not open to him given that they fall exclusively within federal jurisdiction. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 899 – An Ignoble Truth—about the Noble Lie
Feb122025
In our second discussion with Salim Mansur relating to the history and ideas behind ‘neoconservatism,’ we find ourselves once again confronted with the Noble Lie: the belief that some people (the ‘elites’) are endowed with a natural right to rule other people (the masses).
In stark contrast to the principles upon which America was founded (and to the expression of these principles in the American Constitution), the various ‘noble lies’ that slowly crept into the American consciousness resulted in what Salim calls the ‘warping’ of America’s culture.
Among the manifestations assumed by the Noble Lie was one called the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a foreign policy initiative calling for America’s ‘Full Spectrum dominance’ to rule the nations and resources of the entire world.
Selling that idea to the American people, in a nation conditioned never to go abroad ‘looking for monsters to slay,’ became a fait accompli with American acceptance of the twin myths of ‘American exceptionalism’ and of a ‘chosen people’. Indeed, the establishment of the state of Israel, largely supported by Christian Zionists in the ‘bible belt’ of America, became another justification for America’s going abroad looking for ‘monsters to slay.’ Continue reading »
Comments Off on 898 – Freedom Party—challenging Ontario’s zeitgeist | Paul McKeever
Feb052025
With voters in the province of Ontario headed to the polls on February 27, our guest Freedom Party of Ontario leader Paul McKeever explains why Ontario’s snap election -called by Progressive Conservative Premier Doug Ford – is illegal and unjustifiable.
Upon first hearing rumors of an early election being discussed back in January, Paul published and distributed an open letter to call upon MPPs and others to oppose Doug Ford’s snap election bid. In that letter, he cited the Election Statute Law Amendment Act, 2004, and wrote: “I urge Ontario MPPs once again openly and strenuously to oppose – in the name of preserving the democratic rights of all Ontarians – Doug Ford’s anti-democratic plan to hold a general election before the June 2026 date that already is fixed by law.”
By no means is the abuse of democratic process something unique to Ontario; it reflects the disturbing anti-democratic zeitgeist that has gripped Western nations as never before.
Doug Ford’s justification for calling the early election borders on the psychotic. He does not even have the jurisdiction or authority to carry out any of his tariff and trade restriction threats, and his only provincially mandated course of action is to spend taxpayer money without being held accountable for the irresponsible way in which it is being spent.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 897 – Putting Canada first | Maxime Bernier
Jan292025
With a pending Canadian federal election just around the corner, we continue our January 15 preview conversation with PPC leader Maxime Bernier with a deeper focus on some of the specific policies that the PPC will be bringing to the Canadian electorate.
Significantly, Maxime Bernier and the People’s Party of Canada have of late been garnering the attention of the broader international community, which is not only becoming aware that Bernier exists, but that Poilievre may not be Canada’s ideal alternative to the Trudeau regime. Moreover, it is becoming clear that there are many similar patterns of election interference and corruption targeting Maxime’s election campaign that echo the experience of many Western nations.
After all, silencing voices of reason and common sense is a necessary objective of all those who promote Leftist ideologies and policies. That’s why the rules keep changing to keep Maxime Bernier out of the leaders’ debate in the upcoming election.
Small wonder. Just about everything that Bernier and the PPC stand for is the polar opposite of the entrenched Canadian establishment. Continue reading »
Millions have died or suffered as a result of conflicts associated with the neoconservative ideas which have shaped American foreign policy. To understand and critique these policies effectively, it is crucial to examine the background and motivations of neoconservatives.
In Part II of our discussion on neoconservatism, we examine how, growing up in the United States as descendants of Eastern European Jewish immigrants, neocons have spent the last half-century weaving a network of allies. According to their own writings from the Project for the New American Century, their mission is to enforce a global “democratic” hegemony, with the United States at the helm and Israel as a key ally.
Fueled by the ancestral memory of exclusion—physically in the ghettos of Czarist Russia’s Pale of Settlement and ideologically by Stalinist Russia, which rejected the international communism of Leon Trotsky (né Lev Davidovich Bronstein)—these neoconservatives, whose ideas are neither “new” nor “conservative,” have banded together in a sort of loose coalition to address their historical grievances.
Their instrument of vengeance is the imposition of “democracy” worldwide however ironic that might seem. To this end, they’ve barnacled themselves to the Republican Party, despite their ideological leanings being more aligned with the Democratic Party—a party associated with racial elitism and a form of unfettered democracy, which contradicts the foundational principles of the American Republic. They propagate the false notion that only a democratic world, reminiscent of Trotsky’s globalist vision, can be truly just and good, a vision to be realized through the might of the American military-industrial complex.
While it seems that most neoconservatives have moved away from traditional religious affiliations, they maintain, perhaps subconsciously as a result of their culture, that they have been chosen to guide world affairs. This perverse belief can be likened to Plato’s “Noble Lie,” suggesting that leadership should be reserved for those considered inherently superior.
In this extensive conversation, Robert Vaughan engages with People’s Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier to explore the party’s policies, many of which align with those of the newly inaugurated President Donald Trump. They particularly focus their discussion on the contentious issue of immigration.
The question arises: Why has Maxime Bernier, a respected lawyer and once trusted to represent Canada abroad as its Foreign Affairs Minister, been ostracized by the establishment and possibly excluded from the upcoming leaders’ debate? The answer likely mirrors the reasons behind the American media’s and political establishment’s opposition to President Trump: the preservation of power. There seems to be a fervent unwillingness to share power, even if doing so potentially harms the country.
After listening to this discussion, one might consider the clearly rational policies of the PPC and their parallels with those of the highly popular US President, pondering what the establishment truly fears. It is not just the People’s Party of Canada; it is the People.
Your support of our efforts is very much appreciated:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 896 – “Your fire!” says Trump to the Left
Jan222025
With the inauguration of Donald Trump as America’s 47th president, the stage has been set for the next round of conflict between America’s Left and Right. On the heels of America’s possibly worst administration ever, one might argue that there’s no place to go but up, but this would be shortchanging the Trump agenda.
Simply repairing the damage done by the Left is far from the ultimate objective of Trump’s agenda, which seeks to soar America to new heights – so high in fact, that planning to send American astronauts to the planet Mars is among the goals.
Meanwhile, back on earth, one of Trump’s most significant announcements concerns his intention to reinstate those members of the military who refused to take the Covid vaccines – with full back pay. Not only is this an unprecedented act of justice, it also sends a clear message about where Trump stands on the vaccine issue today – especially considering that he now has Robert F Kennedy Jr on his side as well.
And though not mentioned in his inauguration speech, Trump has already followed through on his previous commitment to pardon the ‘January 6’ political prisoners, as well as to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO). Most significantly, these actions, along with the hundreds of other changes that Trump has enacted through executive orders, are all happening simultaneously. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 895 – Trumping Trudeau—the art of Trump’s deal with Canada | Maxime Bernier
Jan152025
As America’s Donald Trump again prepares to lead his nation, Justin Trudeau finally prepares to end his disgraceful rule of Canada. Maxime Bernier, leader of the People’s Party of Canada (PPC), asserts that history will judge Justin Trudeau as Canada’s worst Prime Minister ever.
Meanwhile, south of Canada’s border, the state of California has been experiencing a fire that is far less the consequence of nature than the consequence of political ideology. Simultaneously, Donald Trump is about to take the helm of a nation that is also on political fire from coast-to-coast, making the California fires a perfect metaphor for what he’s up against.
On top of Trump’s domestic priority list is the issue of illegal immigration and Canada has come to be seen as a major problem in this regard.
Given Trump’s threats to impose high tariffs on Canada, plus his jokingly suggesting that Canada become the 51st state in the union, Canadian reactions have spanned a spectrum of differing views. Some reject the suggestion outright, while others have expressed a preference for being part of America rather than having to endure Trudeau any longer.Continue reading »
Robert Vaughan sat down with Maxime Bernier to discuss President Trump’s threat to impose a 25% tariff on Canadian goods crossing the border. Maxime Bernier states that the economic policies of the People’s Party of Canada would diffuse President Trump’s protectionist rhetoric, leading to more amicable negotiations and a deal beneficial to both nations.
The PPC’s policies, if implemented, would eliminate supply management, end all subsidies on lumber, oil, and gas, and dismantle the dairy cartel. These issues, according to Trump’s resent remarks, are the main stumbling blocks to freer trade with the United States. A zero-percent inflation target, also a PPC policy, would make Canada more competitive by stabilizing the purchasing power of the Canadian dollar.
Bernier also noted that before achieving freer trade with the US, Canada should remove inter-provincial barriers to trade, which increase the domestic cost of goods. He emphasized that it’s a matter of putting our own house in order before criticizing the trade practices of another country.
Also in this presentation Bernier gives a quick and blistering critique of the legacy of the Trudeau government now that Trudeau has announced his resignation.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 894 – Mind of State—Neoconservatism’s Noble Lie
Jan082025
“Neoconservatism is not an ideology; it is a state of mind,” asserts Salim Mansur – a state of mind ultimately based on the myth of the “Noble Lie.”
Tellingly, both of these terms – ‘neoconservatism’ and the ‘Noble Lie’ – are unknown to most people. While the latter originates with the early philosophers like Plato and Aristotle, the former is a legacy of 20th century world history.
Essentially, neoconservatism is based on the ‘Noble Lie’ that some people (the ‘elites’) are endowed with a natural right to rule other people (the masses). As such, it is an attitude of the Left, and is perfectly consistent with the teachings and practice of Marxism.
Turning lies into some kind of ‘noble’ virtue is a necessity for all groups and ideologies of the Left, for the simple reason that Leftist ideas are not noble in any respect; they do not correspond to reality or to reason. That’s why the consequences of their actions are so consistently destructive to humanity. Continue reading »
To understand why the United States maintains approximately 800 military bases in about 80 foreign countries and has been involved in numerous armed conflicts globally, it’s essential to examine its foreign policy of neoconservatism.
Professor Salim Mansur of Western University provides us with a master class on neoconservatism, tracing its roots back to the influx of Eastern Europeans into the American cultural matrix during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He examines how many of these newcomers and their descendants came to influence U.S. foreign policy, transforming it from the isolationist and benign approach intended by the Founding Fathers to one that is interventionist and belligerent.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Robert interviews author, John C.A. Manley about his latest book All the Humans Are Sleeping. Here’s what Robert and Bob had to say about it:
“Once again, John C.A. Manley has created a masterpiece. The narrative transcends his story’s plot, infusing insights and observations about some of the most fundamental issues that have faced mankind throughout history.” —Bob Metz
“In All the Humans Are Sleeping,John C.A. Manley skillfully crafts a compelling post-apocalyptic psychological drama where a man faces his ultimate challenge: follow the rest of humanity into a life of shallow fantasies and comfortable lies, or face death in a harsh and unforgiving world devoid of love and hope. And then there’s the robot… You won’t predict the ending, and you won’t be able to put it down.” —Robert Vaughan
Comments Off on 893 – Just Sleeping? —from artificial intelligence to artificial life | John C.A. Manley
Jan012025
Picture a dystopian future following a global nuclear holocaust in which the world’s inhabitants have fled to underground facilities where all the humans are sleeping in pods, living virtual lives in an A.I. generated unreality.
If this theme sounds vaguely familiar, it should. It was the film The Matrix that was the inspiration for the novel “All the Humans are Sleeping,” according to its author and our guest John C.A. Manley.
What does it mean to be ‘human’? At the heart of this question lies the theme, plot, and philosophy of John’s novel. Are we mere intellects, able to exist separately from our biological bodies? Or is being human both an intellectual and physical enterprise?
It’s not as if these questions have not plagued humanity throughout its existence; how one perceives the nature of humans lies at the core of everything that an individual believes to how he behaves. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 892 – Drones—deadly danger or devious distraction?
Dec252024
All around the world, people have been observing and recording sightings of lights in the sky that have for the most part been identified as large drones. In considering whether drones pose a deadly danger or are just a devious distraction, the real question being asked is: Who controls them?
Most of the attention has focused on the New Jersey town of Mendham, whose mayor Christine Glassner has personally witnessed the drones. Above all, she warns against any attempts to shoot them down, citing the possibility that the drones could be carrying a payload of explosives, chemicals, or other dangerous weaponry.
Meanwhile, ex-FBI agent John DeSouza calls the drones “LSDs” (Large Superweapon Drones) suggesting that they are capable of emitting electro-magnetic pulses (EMPs) and can deactivate drones and planes approaching them.
Most ominously, he predicts that all this activity is working up to some kind of “mass casualty event.” He suggests that this could manifest itself in a single catastrophic event or be a “slow kill,” not unlike the strategy employed during the Covid pandemic. Another way to accomplish a “slow kill” is to employ “dirty radiation bombs.”Continue reading »
Comments Off on 891 – Canada’s dystopian derangement—from race to Russians
Dec182024
Upon witnessing the caliber of Canadian politicians and bureaucrats in action, it’s not hard to see why Canada has become so corrupt.
For all its claims to the contrary, Canada has become an explicitly racist, sexist, and fascist state, made so by decades of political corruption that was never addressed or rectified.
On the municipal and provincial levels, we are witness to the town of Wainfleet Ontario‘s council stealing the money and property of its own municipal taxpayers through the use of arbitrary fines.
Meanwhile, the town of Emo Ontario has been fined by an Ontario Human Rights tribunal for failing to fly a gay pride flag.
And on the federal level, Canadian podcaster Lauren Southern has been threatened and harassed for expressing her views by Canada’s fascist Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 890 – Left or Right? It’s about time we got it Right!
Dec112024
Many on the Right have recently found themselves questioning whether or not those on the Left are literally suffering from some kind of mental illness. In making this observation, Montreal litigator turned YouTuber David Freiheit recently said “I’m trying not to think along the terms of Left versus Right,” yet nevertheless was compelled to do exactly that. “Something is broken about a Leftie brain,” he concluded.
And he was essentially correct, though not for the reason he suspects. What is ‘broken’ in a ‘Leftie’s brain’ is the Left’s epistemology, which consists of a litany of false definitions, contradictions in logic, and an explicit rejection of reality. This mindset originates from the ‘Primacy of Consciousness,’ a way of thinking which holds that reality has no independent existence and is a product of consciousness.
No different than a computer programmed with corrupt software, those on the Left have been programmed by a ‘garbage-in-garbage-out’ political language and ideology that does not correspond to reality. Consequently, more and more rational people are beginning to realize that the Left and Right are much more widely polarized along fundamental principles than previously believed.
Of course, the fundamental flaw in the long believed-in ‘political spectrum’ is that, with Communism on the Left and Fascism falsely represented as the Right, freedom and capitalism were nowhere to be found. But both in theory and practice, fascism belongs on the Left along with its other collectivist ideologies. Freedom belongs on the Right. This is a polarity, not a spectrum. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 889 – Trump’s mandate—to rein in the rogue state
Dec042024
Trump’s electoral victory should not be seen as a mission accomplished. His mission is just beginning.
“Trump has to be able to put people like those in Operation Crossfire in jail,” suggests Salim Mansur. “Unless he can do that, there will be no accounting and no future American will be safe.”
Salim describes MAGA (Make America Great Again) as a movement dedicated to restoring America to its constitutional roots. It’s a simple objective, but comes with a tremendously complex array of issues that must be addressed individually.
Those issues include America’s immigration crisis, the state of the economy, free trade and tariffs, health care, the de-weaponization of the Justice Department, and of course, the broader challenge of ‘draining the swamp,’ to name but a few.
In our review of each of these issues, we must be able to both appreciate the positive developments that have arisen as a consequence of Trump’s election, and be aware of the very real dangers associated with Trump’s coming agenda. Continue reading »
President Donald Trump has made some ambitious promises of reform leading up to his decisive victory on November 5th. Whether or not he is capable of delivering on those promises depends on several factors, including how palatable they may be to the House and Senate, how boldly Trump wields the power he holds as Chief Executive, and the character of those he appoints to his cabinet and inner circle as advisors.
To Make America Great Again, Trump’s greatest ally, however, won’t be in his cabinet or in Congress; it will be the United States Constitution and the principles upon which that great republic was founded.
Here to discuss just how successful Trump’s second term might be is Professor Salim Mansur of Western University in conversation with Just Right Media’s Robert Vaughan.
Your generous financial support makes our programming efforts possible.🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 888 – Reverse polarity—Righting the political compass
Nov272024
Those who believe that Left and Right no longer matter in politics are victims of what Dinesh D’Souza calls the Big Lie. The consequence of a Leftist propaganda campaign following World War II, what has most popularly been recognized as the ‘political spectrum’ is in fact a political fiction that has succeeded in crippling the Right – and its ability to counter the Left.
This fictional ‘political spectrum’ places communism on the Left and fascism on the Right. Nowhere on this ‘spectrum’ is there any point or position for the political conditions of freedom and capitalism.
Since the Right represents freedom, in contrast to the Left representing tyranny, getting the world to associate the Right with fascism instead of freedom was a propaganda victory that paved the way for the Left’s ascendancy. It not only robbed the Right of its political identity, it destroyed the natural polarity of politics by placing a single polarity of tyranny at each end of a so-called ‘spectrum.’
Today, many on the Right, when labeled ‘far right’ ‘extreme right’ or the like, cower in fear and shame rather than accept being so labeled as something to be proud of. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 887 – You be the judge—from entity to identity | Paul McKeever
Nov202024
Whether acknowledged or not, every individual has a philosophy, leaving open only the question of how well that philosophy is understood.
At a time when so many people are unable to determine even their own identity (whether based on gender, sexual, political, racial, social, religious grounds, etc.) let alone the nature of the world around them, the dystopian consequences of popular philosophy’s shortcomings have become embarrassingly evident. However, the causes are not so evident because they relate to a failure to properly identify the very nature of things that exist – entities.
The solution to this dilemma, explains our guest Paul McKeever, is to consider the ‘identity’ of any ‘entity’ from a ‘first person’ perspective, not from a ‘third-person’ perspective based on some relationship with the entity in question. If all this seems rather abstract, it is, but the ‘first person’ perspective resolves a fundamental error made by philosophers throughout the ages.
In his monumental work, “Judge: Philosophy and Freedom in the First Person,” Paul meticulously examines thirteen classic philosophical problems, offering solutions with such lucidity that there remains no justification for their continued discussion as credible issues. Written over a period of ten years, it is the product of a philosophical examination never before undertaken.
‘Judge’ presents both a challenge and a clarity to many long-held philosophical concepts including, among others, free will, induction, causation, perspective, relation, entity, identity, change, autonomy, and freedom itself.
In the field of philosophy there are four essential categories affecting how and what choices people make. Metaphysics and epistemology describe ‘what is.’ Morality and politics describe ‘what ought’ to be. But if one’s moral and political actions are based on a false conception of ‘what is,’ then a dystopian unreality becomes a natural consequence of the error. Hence, the importance of being able to correctly identify the reality within which one acts.
In an age of ‘identity politics,’ it’s surprising how little the concept of ‘identity’ is actually understood. For that shortcoming, we can blame the philosophers throughout the ages who never got it Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
For many, philosophy has devolved into an exercise where errors in reasoning, logic, and definitions are layered upon one another, resulting in the field becoming a subject of mockery among the general populace. Imagine if foundational sciences like physics, chemistry, or mathematics had clung to their initial mistakes; we might never have seen the advent of computers or advancements in medicine, and basic arithmetic could still be in dispute.
To rejuvenate the importance of philosophy, we need to pinpoint and resolve its historical puzzles and paradoxes, effectively consigning them to obsolescence.
In his work, “Judge: Philosophy and Freedom in the First Person,” Paul McKeever meticulously examines twelve classic philosophical problems, offering solutions with such lucidity that there remains no justification for their continued discussion as credible issues.
“Judge” distinguishes itself as a work of deep insight, crucial not just for academic scholars but for anyone intrigued by the exploration of human nature, our connection to reality, and our interactions with others. In a very novel way, it provides one with an understanding of reality, perception, identity, logical reasoning, ethical principles, and the fundamental aspects of individual freedom.
However, there’s no need to take our word for this assessment. In keeping with the theme of McKeever’s work, you be the judge.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 886 – The Trump Rearrangement Syndrome
Nov132024
Unlike those suffering with Trump ‘Derangement’ Syndrome, those subject to the Trump ‘Rearrangement’ Syndrome will actually have something real to contend with. Donald Trump’s plans heading into his next term as president include a litany of changes that will rearrange America’s political scene in a way never before attempted.
With Trump’s aggressive plan to dismantle the deep state and to reclaim freedom of speech as the cornerstone of a free society, a new syndrome is arising, one that specifically afflicts those in the deep state: the Trump Rearrangement Syndrome.
Symptoms include an open and public refusal to acknowledge Trump’s presidency, attempts to jail Trump, attempts to assassinate Trump, propaganda campaigns directed against Trump, and infecting the public with lies that lead to Trump Derangement Syndrome.
One of the strangest things about the 2024 election was how the Democrats ran a campaign as if Trump was the incumbent. This is telling. Not only did this strategy suggest that they knew the last election was stolen, but they were also psychologically acknowledging that Trump remains the people’s choice. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 885 – State of confusion—about the state
Nov062024
Now that Trump has achieved his well-earned electoral victory, expectations will be high for the Trump team to deliver on its agenda. If past experience is any guide, the greatest danger now facing the Right is for a sense of complacency to emerge within its ranks, following a victory presumed to be an end goal.
Too often, many on the Right disengage from the political process after achieving a given political objective. Meanwhile, the Left never ceases to aggressively engage in the political process irrespective of its victories or losses.
It is not for nothing it is said that eternal vigilance is the price of freedom. It is a lack of that vigilance (and understanding) required to protect freedom that has allowed the process of state growth to continue unabated.
Thus the years ahead demand a clear understanding of the nature of what we have all been through, in terms of our governments running amok, constantly creating crisis’, and pushing us to the brink of war. To reverse that trend and to prevent it from repeating, we must correctly identify the cause and process that leads to tyranny.
Towards that end our attention was recently drawn to Murray Rothbard’s Anatomy of the State (1974), in which the classic libertarian defined what the state is and is not, along with the step-by-step process that tyrannical governments universally follow to achieve their sinister ends. It is a process chillingly descriptive of today’s political zeitgeist. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 884 – The Trump card—is being played
Oct302024
With the US election days away, the Trump card is now on the table and is well in play.
Ironically, it is Donald Trump’s opponents who are playing the Trump card to Trump’s advantage. In their frenzied state of panic, they are irrationally reacting to Trump’s every nuanced statement in a way that can only encourage reasonable people to support Trump.
As Robert F Kennedy Jr observed when citing the Democrats’ lack of policy back on August 26, “Who needs a policy when you have Trump to hate?”
Indeed. Those afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome have yet to offer any cogent, intelligent, or objective reasons justifying their hate. And hate it is; theirs is no mere disagreement.
Consequently, even this close to election day, many are predicting that there won’t even be an election. Some predict that there will be a breakout of nuclear war before the election or in the immediate days following. There are those predicting that Trump will win in a landslide, but that the Democrats will cheat at the polls again. Some are predicting that Trump will be assassinated before he is inaugurated. And of course, there are the myriad of predictions of various ’emergency declarations’ over everything from climate change to viral pandemics.
From a predictive point of view, the only question is which of these tactics will ultimately win out over the others, or if any of them will actually come to pass. Whatever one’s expectation, with regard to each and every prediction just listed (plus many others) there are activists, politicians, and private interests working towards each of those sinister objectives.
The time has arrived for Americans to vote for the candidate whose qualifications are Just Right to Make America Great Again.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 883 – Just write—the power of fiction is no fiction | John C.A. Manley
Oct232024
Canadians were “surprisingly sadistic” during Canada’s recent Covid lockdowns says author John Manley, whose fictional account of that reality reflects some of his own personal experience in that regard.
As a book that just “had to be written,” Much Ado About Corona is a chilling reminder of a very real dystopia that many are attempting to shove down the memory hole of forgotten lessons of history. Indeed, the absence of current fictional stories, TV shows and movies that even acknowledge the recent and current forced lockdowns, forced injections, and other death cult atrocities is telling.
Not surprisingly, YouTube immediately deleted our interview with John, recognizing that, even though ostensibly a discussion about fiction and writing fiction, truth is no stranger to fiction. Truth is an essential element of any good fiction.
In contrast, YouTube prides itself on spreading lies, misinformation, and disinformation while projecting its crimes on to those who are exposing YouTube’s lies, misinformation, and disinformation. YouTube gives new meaning to the phrase ‘truth is stranger than fiction.’
But the power of fiction is no fiction. Especially when truth becomes ‘stranger than fiction,’ it is fiction that can best reveal that truth in a way that is Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
We highly recommend Much Ado About Corona: A Dystopian Love Story for its accurate portrayal of the human condition during the upheaval of the COVID-19 era. This narrative not only weaves an enjoyable tale of romance and adventure but also serves as a much needed reflection of the shared experience during those years.
In the aftermath of any significant historical event, one has the choice between engaging with the clinical, data-driven accounts found in academic papers and history books, the politically skewed accounts in newspapers and government press releases, or exploring the emotional, psychological, and social dimensions through the immersive storytelling of fiction.
Much Ado About Corona offers a literary lens through which to view the complexities, the chaos, and the collective madness of the COVID-19 years, making it an essential read for anyone seeking a deeper understanding of this recent and painful historical moment.
Here we interview author John C. A. Manley and delve into some of the background details which went into the creation of “Much Ado About Corona” and also some of the events during the Corona-era which prompted the writing of the novel.
It should be noted that YouTube removed this video from their platform for its accurate analysis of the Covid years and for condemning the medical tyranny which tarnished that time in our history.
Comments Off on 882 – Singing to end the reign (of tyranny)—with more music that’s Just Right
Oct162024
“It’s culture” say many reacting to the flood of musical memes based on Donald Trump’s “Eating-the-dogs-eating-the-cats” refrain.
In this, our fourth venture into the culture of ‘Music that’s Just Right,’ the significance of the memes have forced us to feature several versions, attesting to a musical phenomenon that is unprecedented. With the American election only a few weeks away, their significance is all the more heightened.
It is remarkable how creative and well-performed so many of these memes are. Even more remarkable is that they are being created at all. For Donald Trump, this represents a massive cultural re-alignment, once again demonstrating the principle that “politics is downstream from culture.”
Of course, our musical spotlight today extends beyond the current “Eating-the-dogs-eating-the-cats” phenomenon. Also featured are several musical voices for freedom from other eras in the history of Western culture. These yet again demonstrate another principle – that history repeats, and that the struggle for freedom is eternal and demands eternal vigilance.
Sometimes that vigilance takes the form of music that’s Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 881 – The politics of abortion: Rights versus Status
Oct092024
The issue of ‘abortion’ has once again been thrust into the political arena. America’s Democratic Party has practically become a ‘single issue party’ campaigning for ‘abortion rights’ extending from conception to birth – and beyond.
Yet, it has long been understood that ‘abortion’ – as a political issue – is unresolvable in terms of satisfying a voting majority, which is why most political parties wisely avoid raising it. Some believe that abortion should be banned outright, others at various stages during a pregnancy, and still others are supportive of abortion up to and ‘after birth.’
By pushing the abortion issue into the political arena, Democrats have successfully forced their opponents to address the issue, a tactic that tends to reveal weakness and division among those on the Right.
For example, Trump has been celebrated by the Right for having reversed Roe vs Wade, thus returning the jurisdiction over abortion back to the individual states, as per the American Constitution. On the other hand, many on the Right were outraged by Melania Trump’s recent publicized support of a woman’s right to an abortion.
And in Canada the new ‘right wing’ Unity Party of Canada has formed to compete specifically with the People’s Party of Canada with whom it shares many policy initiatives, save for the issue of ‘abortion.’ (Not exactly what one might expect from a party promoting ‘unity.’) Continue reading »
“You must use your words, your ideas, as your weapon. It’s a war. It’s a cultural war. It’s an ideological war. And to win that war we need to speak out – use our words as our weapon. They’re very powerful.”
So asserts Maxime Bernier, leader of the People’s Party of Canada (PPC), whose recent appearance in London Ontario afforded us an opportunity to personally get together to discuss some of the major issues facing Canadians (and most of the Western nations as well).
For those still unfamiliar with Bernier and the PPC, our broadcast today offers information and insights you’ll never hear in the corporate mainstream media. Listen in on Maxime’s address to his audience; note how he fearlessly and knowledgably responds to tough and uncomfortable questions during Q&A sessions.
In particular, we enjoyed how he responded to our suggestion that he is Canada’s ‘Donald Trump,’ and to the significance of Trump’s recent comments about “eating the cats and eating the dogs.” Continue reading »
It is ironic indeed that a political party called the ‘Democratic’ Party should be so fundamentally anti-democratic. It has reached the point where Democrats believe that murder, violence and hatred are completely acceptable in the arena of politics and elections. And they brag about it.
In calling for the assassination of Donald Trump, Democrats and others on the Left (which includes many ‘conservatives’ and RINOs) are demonstrating their utter contempt for the democratic process – and for the majority of Americans. Yet they hypocritically accuse Trump of being ‘a threat to democracy.’
Those on the Right who do not believe in murder and violence as a means to achieve an electoral or political victory must resolve the problem of how to possibly defeat an armed and deadly sociopathic political ideology by peaceful means. This is made all the more difficult because those on the Right are handicapped by their own principles and sense of morality. For peacefully working hard to ensure that future American elections will result in accurate and valid vote counts, Democrats and the Left accuse them of ‘insurrection’ and threatening democracy! Continue reading »
Comments Off on 878 – CATastrophic developments in Springfield Ohio
Sep182024
“They’re eating the cats…” With those words, Donald Trump unleashed a veritable cultural revolution and stole the show that was masquerading as a presidential candidates’ debate. It was a stroke of genius, unrecognized by the vast majority of commentators, bloggers, and podcasters, including many on the Right.
In assessing who ‘won the debate’ held on September 10, very few took the big picture view. Many were impressed by Kamala Harris’ aggressive demeanor as she spewed a torrent of demonstrable lies, while interpreting Trump’s low-key demeanor and his ‘cat comments’ as evidence of Kamala’s victory in the debate.
Given the overwhelming – and continuing – public response to Trump’s declaration that “They’re eating the cats,” there can now be no doubt that Trump was the clear winner of the debate. The world’s attention turned to Springfield Ohio where the problem of mass immigration could be seen on a level understandable to the average person on the street. It is to this demographic – the NPCs – that Trump’s ‘cat’ comment most appealed. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 877 – Trump’s political play—for the NPCs of politics
Sep112024
The term ‘Non Player Character’ (NPC) is widely understood to refer to those characters in a video game who are not controlled by a player, but are pre-programmed automated features of the game. In the world of politics, NPCs are voters who automatically follow the herd, without considering the fundamental principles or issues behind a given election in which they are voting. In other words, most voters.
Also referred to as ‘low information voters,’ NPCs have correctly come to be seen by many as a significant cause of America’s radical drift to the Left. But the problem is not the fact that NPCs exist and participate in the electoral process; it is that they tend to vote Left by default.
For those on the Right, it is tempting to want to correct the voting ‘process’ in the hopes that this will halt or reverse the slide into tyranny. To be sure, having an honest voting process is a positive and necessary objective, but it must never be forgotten that whether we get ‘good’ government or whether we get ‘bad’ government depends on the people and parties we elect.
Complicating matters is the fact that electoral politics by its nature compels the voter to vote for a ‘person,’ not necessarily for an idea, ideology, or policy. That’s why during political campaigns, politicians tend to attack the messengers rather than the messages. For the NPCs in the political herd, politics is thus reduced to a cult of personalities devoid of issues or substance. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 876 – America’s republic—dead and buried?
Sep042024
For those on the Right, the alliance between Donald Trump and Robert F Kennedy Jr. has produced both a sense of optimism and of foreboding. That such an alliance would even be deemed necessary is a testament to the serious nature of America’s political crisis.
“We are entering very stormy waters,” warns Salim Mansur, who says he is more worried today going forward, particularly given the recent failed assassination attempt against Trump.
His heightened concern is justifiable. Knowing that a Trump-Kennedy alliance terrifies those on the Left, and knowing that the Left does not abide by established civilized principles of democracy, “stormy waters” are indeed ahead.
The Left has already demonstrated that it prefers ‘bullets to ballots,’ both domestically and abroad. “We are on a war footing,” warns Salim, “and the Democratic Party is full out for war.”Continue reading »
Comments Off on 875 – Elect trick: The DNC, Kennedy, and Trump
Aug282024
While the Democratic National Convention was being hailed as an ‘electric’ event by Democrats, the real ‘elect trick’ was being pulled off by Robert F Kennedy Jr and Donald Trump. With Kennedy’s announcement that he would be endorsing Donald Trump in the November elections, whatever wind had gathered behind the Democratic sails was instantly dissipated.
“The DNC manufactured a surge of popularity for Harris based on nothing,” Kennedy announced on August 26. “Who needs a policy when you have Trump to hate?”
While Harris may not have any policies, she and the Democratic Party do nevertheless pursue an ideology based on the politics of envy.
“We fight for equality but we also need to fight for equity because not everybody starts out at the same place” proclaimed Kamala Harris. “You understand some people need more.”Continue reading »
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s decision to suspend his campaign and support Trump in the swing states marks a momentous shift in American politics.
His castigation of the Democratic Party as a party of “war, censorship, corruption, big pharma, big tech, big ag, and big money” has all but gutted Kamala Harris’ chance to become President.
Professor Salim Mansur of Western University joins Just Right Media’s Robert Vaughan to discuss this historic decision by Kennedy to put county before party.
Your financial support is appreciated and is what makes our programming possible:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 874 – The politics of envy—the pro-socialist mentality
Aug212024
It is a sad fact that the vast majority of people have no idea what either socialism or capitalism actually are. However despite this shortcoming, most have some vague association regarding the moral justification for each.
Generally, most associate socialism with an altruistic philosophy of caring for others, and capitalism with selfishness, greed, and exploitation of others. Both of these viewpoints are false, and both emanate from the ideology of the Left.
Just as most are unaware of the nature of either socialism or capitalism, they also are unaware of the person who was primarily responsible for creating their false conceptions of each: Karl Marx.
Karl Marx was a loser in regard to every aspect of what it means to be human. In his image, he created the religion of Marxism. “It’s crucial to see Marxism as a religious architecture, not an economic theory,” warns Professor James Lindsay. And as reported by TIKhistory, “Karl Marx was brought up in mainstream religion instilling him with an altruistic morality.” Continue reading »
Comments Off on 873 – The politics of envy—the anti-capitalist mentality
Aug142024
Politics has earned a negative reputation among the populace, owing not to the nature of politics per se, but to the nature of the majority who are drawn to politics and political office. Regrettably, when it comes to most politicians, they have often been described as being lazy, envious, entitled, and/or incompetent. Most significantly, they oppose capitalism and all that it represents.
That’s because capitalism is an economic condition that naturally arises within a free society. By definition, capitalism is an economic condition under which force, coercion, fraud and theft are prohibited by law, and under which all economic transactions are voluntary. Under capitalism, the government is a referee, not a player on the economic board within its jurisdiction.
The anti-capitalist mentality expresses itself in a number of ways.
“It’s sick and twisted that I have to work, just to live my life,” complained one young poster on Tic Tok. To him, this was an injustice, to be corrected by others freely providing him with the basic necessities of life while not having to offer anything in return. It is to this envy, laziness, incompetence, and sense of entitlement that so many politicians and their policies cater. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 872 – From Marx to Jefferson—Epicurious about Epicurus
Aug072024
When a philosopher has been said to influence everyone from Karl Marx to Thomas Jefferson, it bears taking note, particularly given the polarized political zeitgeist in which we currently find ourselves. One such philosopher was Epicurus (341-270 BC), perhaps best known as an advocate of ‘the simple life’ as the path to happiness.
So naturally, we became ‘epi-curious’ about Epicurus given that the right to the ‘pursuit of happiness’ is a founding principle of a free society. What we discovered was that ‘happiness’ itself is an incredibly polarized concept, a polarization that can also be seen in terms of the political Left and Right. This perhaps partially accounts for the differing narratives and interpretations regarding Epicurus’ history and philosophy.
For example, given the contrast between the motivations of Karl Marx and Thomas Jefferson, it should not be surprising that each interpreted the philosophy of Epicurus in equally contrasting ways. Were Epicurus alive today, how he himself might have viewed their Epicurean narratives is certainly a subject open to discussion.
According to one source regarding the Greek philosopher: “Epicurus promoted the following worldview: the universe is made of atoms and void and subject to the laws of physics without divine intervention. The world can be understood through an empiricist epistemology, and pleasure, pursued intelligently and ethically, is the goal of life.”Continue reading »
Comments Off on 871 – The outsiders: Donald J Trump – John F Kennedy
Jul312024
In the wake of July 2024’s failed assassination attempt against Donald Trump, a brief review of America’s ‘assassination record’ may be in order. Viewed through the lens of history, what alarmingly emerges are numerous parallels between the Trump shooting and the assassination of John F Kennedy back in 1963.
Trump and Kennedy are both ‘outsiders’ says Salim Mansur, who describes the ‘insiders’ as those ‘inside’ the ‘military-industrial-complex.’ So when it is said that the actions taken against the ‘outsiders’ are an ‘inside job,’ it must be understood in this context.
Nor is America’s ‘assassination record’ limited just to Trump and JFK. From the many political figures to the patsy’s blamed for their murders, the list of victims and intended victims again echoes a common refrain: “It’s an inside job.”
What Trump and JFK share in common is the fact that both are outsiders with plans to dismantle the military-industrial-complex. That placed them in direct conflict with the so-called ‘neo-cons’ who, as the voice and “political face” of the military-industrial-complex, argue for the maintenance of perpetual war and conflict, even if it involves the use of nuclear weapons.
Together, the ‘neo-cons’ and the military industrial complex can be loosely identified as the ‘deep state.’ They are “psychopaths with no humanity in their actions” concludes Salim upon observing their actions and history.
In the eyes of the ‘deep state’ Trump‘s singular ‘crime’ was to be an ‘outsider’ competing for the office of president, and who, in the process, exposed the ‘deep state’ to both America and the rest of the world. That is why Trump, America, and the world continue to be in danger as long as the ‘deep state’ is left free to pursue its death cult ideology.
Fortunately, there has been one major and positive development between the time of JFK’s assassination and today.
Unlike conditions in 1963 when the assassination narrative was monopolized by the assassins, thanks to the technology of i-phones and social media in 2024, not only has that monopoly been broken, but alternate narratives pointing towards the truth are now available for the first time. Ironically, in an age of the surveillance state, conditions are now Just Right for the surveillance state to be itself surveilled by those it spies on.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Latest, Politics, VideoComments Off on JFK Redux—The attempted assassination of President Trump
Jul242024
While a comprehensive analysis is imperative, preliminary findings from the extensive video and audio documentation at the scene suggest that the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump was orchestrated by the Deep State. This incident bears a striking resemblance to the successful assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963, suggesting that the Deep State will employ any means necessary to safeguard the interests of the Military-Industrial Congressional Complex.
Joining Just Right Media’s Robert Vaughan is Professor Salim Mansur of Western University. Together, they discuss the ominous parallels between the assassination of JFK and the attempted assassination of DJT, providing a unique scholarly perspective on these events.
Your financial support is appreciated and is what makes our programming possible:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 870 – Within earshot—of the end of America
Jul242024
The failed July 13 2024 attempt to assassinate Donald Trump has captured the world’s attention and imagination. Can Trump’s survival be attributed to lady luck or was it divine intervention?
Of course, those disappointed or outraged that Trump survived certainly would not ask such a question. For them, this was a failed attempt to rid the world of a Hitlerian fascist dictator, that fake political caricature created by the fake news media.
Even so, notions of divine intervention were less inspired by the fact that Trump survived an assassination attempt than by the fact that he was shot in the ear. It was Trump’s ear injury that changed the dynamic of the event by providing objective evidence of an assassination attempt that could not easily be denied.
The reality that America came within earshot of its own destruction also served to catapult the event within earshot of the entire world community. Ironically, had Trump not been injured at all, July 13 might never have attained its symbolic status that will now be embedded into American history and lore for years to come.
More than anything else, July 13 was a sobering reminder that we live in one of the most dangerous times in history, afflicted by a ‘deep state’ death cult of the Left that only wants to maintain power and perpetual war.
On the other hand, July 13 was also a refreshing reminder of the power of the internet in an information war never before accessible to individuals and groups outside of the establishment media.
With the realities of history challenging the fake news narratives of years gone by, independent and objective reports on those histories are now surfacing that appear to reflect a current truth about our so-called ‘democracies’ that is unfortunately Just Right: namely, that reprehensible and evil people really control the world.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Peyman Askari is standing as a candidate for the People’s Party of Canada in the riding of West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea To Sky Country. He came across many of Robert’s Just Right Media videos regarding the PPC and Canadian politics and thought that he might make a worthy guest on his new podcast, In Lay Terms.
Many topics of a personal and public nature are discussed: education and work experience, running as a candidate for the Canadian Alliance, Robert’s time as a trustee on the London Board of Education, co-hosting the radio show Just Right, his many interviews with many celebrities and personalities, and his personal beliefs and philosophy.
Comments Off on 869 – The Canadian Connection—Globalism and Immigration
Jul172024
In the shadow of the Trump assassination attempt, it is important never to forget that that shadow was cast by global events that reveal a growing public opposition to the Left and to globalism. Little has actually changed on the world political stage – other than a speeded awakening of many who were still unaware of the threat to their own lives. For the deep state, the assassination attempt was just business as usual, given its death cult ideology and record.
With opposition to wars raging in the mid-east and Ukraine, with domestic protests and riots occurring in most of the European nations, and with European election results revealing an emerging trend to the Right, the ‘deep state’ has a lot to worry about. It is encountering a powerful rejection of its mission to flood established cultures with unregulated immigration and to establish a one-world globalist state.
Robert Vaughan and Salim Mansur took a look at the recent election results in France, where that country’s unique run-off electoral system exposed some political trends that might otherwise have gone unnoticed in other nations with differing electoral systems.
However, their reference to “the French connection” within the context of the European elections concerned the French connection with Canada, a country that owes much of its history to France, and which also exhibits certain parallel current political trends with France.
Like France, Canada is being threatened by globalism and unregulated immigration. And also like France, hidden within each country’s legitimate immigration history are the millions of ‘new’ French and ‘new’ Canadian citizens who can no longer be separated from the cultures of those nations. As an example, despite Robert and Salim’s own very different historical connections to Canada, they each identify as Canadian in a country that, like France, must attempt to restore its own history in order to preserve the Canadian culture and identity.
While many Western nations have “suicidally crashed their own histories,” France appears to be attempting to recover its French history. In contrast, Canada’s history as a “peace keeping” nation continues to be lost thanks to its support of foreign wars and a lack of leadership in Canada. “Where are the Canadian voices?” laments Salim.
That’s a question that remains to be resolved. If there’s one thing the globalist Left fears most, it’s anything that is Just Right, particularly when it’s the voice of the people speaking out against tyranny.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
The poem “The Second Coming” by William Butler Yeats begins with the lines, “Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; / Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.” These verses are particularly apt in light of the recent French National Assembly elections, where President Emmanuel Macron’s centrist party suffered a significant defeat. As Professor Salim Mansur observes, “They have turned against the Center.”
The historical ties between France and Canada are profound, dating back to the era of Samuel de Champlain. Approximately one quarter of Canadians trace their ancestry to France, and Canada has fought two world wars on French soil. The two nations share an intricate and intertwined history.
In light of this historical context, it is crucial to examine the recent French election results, which saw Macron’s Centrist Ensemble fall to second place, while the Leftist New Popular Front and the Rightist National Rally gained ground.
Macron’s party faced a massive defeat as the French grew weary of both a globalist agenda and an increasing immigrant population. The New Popular Front addressed the globalist agenda in a manner reminiscent of Charles de Gaulle, rejecting the machinations of a Europe that would entangle them in a conflict with Russia. Meanwhile, the National Rally, led by Marine Le Pen, focused on the issue of immigration.
Salim and Robert discuss the election results, which, contrary to the beliefs of many on the Right, are not entirely negative when viewed in full context amidst the looming backdrop of war.
Your financial support is appreciated and is what makes our programming possible:
🧡 PayPal
Following his disastrous performance in his first 2024 Presidential election debate with Donald Trump, one must wonder if Joe Biden is just biding his time until Democrats decide what to do about him. Speculation about the future of Biden’s presidential candidacy is at an all time high, given that so many were still unaware of his condition until the June 28 CNN presidential debate.
As a career politician for decades, Biden would be the perfect poster boy for Donald Trump’s plan to introduce term limits to the American political landscape.
But while most dwell on Biden’s physical and mental condition, it was his political condition that was far more concerning. Biden’s vision of America is a dystopian nightmare of perpetual war and tyranny.
While Trump speaks of a ‘great’ America as a safe place for Americans to live, work, and pursue their own happiness and objectives, Biden’s vision of a ‘great’ America is one of a bully state, bullying other nations to the point of conflict and war. “They don’t want to screw around with us,” said Biden in reference to China and Russia.
For his part, Trump’s debate performance was among his best: disciplined and presidential. Clearly aware of Biden’s incoherence and inability to focus, Trump was placed in the difficult position of having to diplomatically treat his opponent with consideration for his condition.
Perhaps Trump’s best presidential performance in terms of his vision for America took place on July 4, 2020 with his speech delivered in front of Mount Rushmore. Citing the destruction of American history and culture by the Left, Trump delivered a speech to set the record straight, vowing never to be silenced by his opponents.
With Trump’s unparalleled popularity and an agenda that is Just Right for Americans in their time of crisis, whether or not Biden is replaced will have little effect on Trump’s re-election this November.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 867 – Time served—the criminal trials of Julian Assange
Jul032024
“The case of Julian Assange symbolizes how bankrupt the West has become,” says Salim Mansur. He also warns that, in the rise of an Anglo-American empire, there can be no republican values.
Translated, that means that individual rights and freedom do not exist in empires and that freedom of speech represents a deadly threat to empires because they are of necessity based on lies.
In referring to the criminal trials of Julian Assange, it must be emphasized that it is the trials themselves that were criminal, not any proven allegations against Julian Assange. His ‘crime’ was to shine a light on the empire of lies.
Among the greatest of those lies were the narratives contrived to justify perpetual war. With an understanding that war depends on lies while peace depends on truth, the necessity of false narratives on the part of the war mongering ‘military industrial complex’ becomes self-evident.
How something as undemocratic as a ‘military industrial complex’ could have arisen within a democracy can partially be explained by learning that the original name of that complex was the ‘Military Industrial Congressional Complex.’ In other words, the democratic component of the complex appears to have been Congress itself, and the word ‘Congressional’ was duly removed to help conceal that association.
The false narratives were spread by what Donald Trump famously coined ‘the fake news media’ while those who revealed true narratives were subject to censorship and political imprisonment. Despite a past Supreme Court ruling that “a free press is intended to serve the governed, not the government,” it is clear that there is no longer a functional Fourth Estate dedicated to that task and responsibility.
Thankfully it appears that the rising influence of social media, combined with the falling influence of mainstream media, is having a positive effect towards creating a better informed citizenry. Independent journalism seems to be an ideal way to re-establish a Fourth Estate that serves the governed in a way that is Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 866 – Defining politics: the political theatre of epistemology
Jun262024
When it comes to politics, you can never be sure whether to laugh or cry. In a field where the cardinal rule is ‘define or be defined’, defining politics itself can be elusive.
Politics is commonly (though correctly) associated with the state and government. But politics is also played outside of the government arena, as in office politics, business politics, and social politics involving competitions for social status.
Interestingly, most dictionaries do not describe what makes ‘political’ activity distinct from other forms of human activities without referring to state or government.
One distinctive attribute of politics suggests that when something becomes ‘political’ it means that the game is no longer being played on a level playing field. But the unspoken truth about the distinctive nature of politics is that it has become a socially acceptable means of acquiring the unearned. Worse, when it comes to governments, actions otherwise considered unconscionable or criminal are broadly tolerated if carried out for political reasons.
Politics has always operated in a political theatre of epistemology – a war of words calculated to win the support of the public. By controlling populations through the creation of fake definitions, politicians can pursue their real agendas in a manner unseen by most.
No issue could demonstrate the political war of definitions better than the Covid ‘vaccine-bioweapon-gene therapy-plandemic’. Several American states have launched civil actions against Pfizer, based on the fact that Pfizer illegally re-defined terms like ‘vaccine,’ ‘adverse event,’ ‘virus,’ ‘vaccination,’ and ‘infection’ to mean things that those words and terms do not mean. The significance of this is that for vaccine manufacturers using the contrived definitions, immunity from liability will no longer apply.
Thankfully, the war of words is also fought with valid definitions that correspond to the facts. These developments appear to represent a significant step in the Right direction because when it comes to the vaccine industry, it’s the defining issue that’s Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
“Is Europe turning far right?” That question is being asked by many commentators both in social media and in the mainstream media itself. Concluding that the the recent results in the European Union parliamentary elections represent a “conservative Red wave and a move to the Right,” expectations are high that the tide of tyranny is finally reaching an end.
Aside from the inconvenient fact that conservatism is associated with the color blue, and not red, one can never be certain what values most people associate with the Right. The same uncertainty presents itself regarding the association of conservatives, libertarians and Objectivists with the Right. One of the problems with the terms Left and Right is that to most people, these terms are not associated with definitive ideas but simply represent political opposition.
It’s safe to say that virtually all those on the Left are globalists, even if they are unaware of that term. They idealize a ‘nation-less’ world as some kind of utopia, utterly oblivious to the horrifying reality of that idea. Disappointingly (and surprising to some), conservatives, libertarians, and even Objectivists have many representatives and factions promulgating Leftist objectives and ideals, particularly globalism and an end to the sovereignty of nations.
Consequently, you can never be sure whether any of these individuals and groups are on the Left or Right until you understand their specific views and policies as measured against the understood and correct principles of each polarity.
‘Red’ or ‘Blue,’ whether that wave is truly moving in the Right direction is a question that can only be resolved when the wave reaches the shore of national governance.
When the Left constantly berates anything Right as being ‘far,’ ‘extreme,’ or whatever, the objective is to destroy the very concept of being Right. To the extent that they can get enough people to believe that being Just Right is simply not possible, the Left will continue to win the information war even in the midst of a ‘Red wave.’
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 864 – The Right WING—flying in every direction
Jun122024
The belief that Left and Right have become useless labels has been utterly destructive to those on the Right.
Expressing a recognition that conservatives and liberals have become a ‘uni-party,’ many on the Right have falsely operated on the assumption that, for example, Republicans represent the Right and Democrats represent the Left. The sad fact is that, just as ‘Republicans in name only’ (RINOs) are not Republicans, so too many on the right ‘wing’ are ‘Right in name only.’ Or in other words, their ideologies are Left.
How did this misconception of Left and Right arise?
That Republicans and Democrats sit in ‘opposition’ to each other leads most to believe that the split between them is ideological – Left versus Right. But the real ‘split’ is about power, not about ideology. (This principle also applies to parliamentary governments, where there is an ‘official opposition’ yet with little or no ideological difference to the ruling party.) Continue reading »
As our guest earlier this year on February 21, Ches Crosbie stressed that “the (censorship industrial complex) must be eliminated before the truth about ‘vaccine’ injuries reaches enough people and a proper reconciliation can be pursued.” He was then speaking on behalf of Canada’s National Citizens Inquiry and it is now becoming apparent that his was no mere ‘armchair’ observation.
Ches joins us again today to update us on some potentially significant developments, one concerning efforts to pursue a proper reconciliation regarding vaccine injuries and the necessity of compensation for the victims, and the other on countering the censorship complex with new voices of opposition.
“That we are subject to pandemics at all is ‘the’ greatest lie,” asserts the former leader of the official opposition in Newfoundland. While calling for the Canadian government to consider a ‘no fault’ compensation program for victims of vaccine injuries, he additionally asserts that it is more important to have criminal proceedings undertaken against those responsible for the damage. In assessing public support for such action he notes that the public’s “pendulum is swinging and it’s swinging with a lot of force.”
On the free speech front, Ches has announced that beginning on July 1, a new two hour national daily talk show hosted by Randy Taylor will begin on its mission of talking about “true things.” Introduced during a time when the Canadian and US governments have launched all-out attacks against media outlets that offer facts and truth to their audiences, it may prove to be a rather risky and adventurous undertaking.
But when it comes to talking about “true things,” we welcome the prospect of sharing the honor of being Just Right with as many voices as possible.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
“One death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.” ~ Stalin
The callousness of Stalin’s treatment of his countrymen is infamous. One might assume that such disdain for human life would be an isolated historical incident. However, enduring the events of recent years, we have witnessed a level of carnage rivaling the scale of the Soviet Union’s purges and pogroms.
The data on all-cause mortality now available reveals that there was no COVID-19 pandemic. It was, in fact, a complete fabrication. Instead of the feared “curve” or upsurge in hospital admissions overwhelming the “system,” we saw doctors and nurses gleefully performing choreographed dance routines in the empty corridors and wards of vacant hospitals.
Just as the data surrounding the COVID-19 deaths was suspect, so too are the statistics concerning just how many people died or were severely crippled and otherwise injured from the injection of an experimental mRNA into their system to create a toxic spike protein.
By the Canadian government’s own admission, these are the results of vaccine injuries (excluding Quebec which has its own reporting and compensation system):
Total adverse events: 58,712 (as of Jan 5, 2024)
Non-serious: 47,010
Serious: 11,702
Deaths: 488 (although they claim only 4 were causally related to the COVID-19 injections)
Each injury represents a tragedy. The tens of thousands injured? Well, that’s just a statistic.
With the pall of fear hanging over the heads of healthcare professional who dare to question the doctrine of their guilds these statistics should be considered to be a pale reflection of the actual carnage inflicted on us by those responsible.
In November of 2023 the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) released its report on the overreach by governments in response to “the pandemic that never was.” It’s conclusions are damning, and its documentation and archiving of some of the stories of Canadians adversely affected by the “pandemic” are monumental.
Ches Crosbie, a Newfoundland lawyer and former Leader of that province’s official opposition (2018-2021), played a key role in administrating the NCI. His experience makes him uniquely qualified, indeed an expert, in understanding how COVID-19 and the government’s response to it injured and even killed Canadians.
In his concluding words in this discussion with Just Right Media’s Robert Vaughan, Crosbie states:
“The reality is, I’m convinced, that modern societies, our society, is not susceptible to pandemics. That’s the one lie that underlies all the other lies. That we are subject to pandemics at all is the greatest lie and anyone who advances a platform—news, advice, recommends vaccines—they need to go into the category of extreme suspicion because they’re trying to sell you something based on fear and a fear which is wholly unjustified. Watch out for the purveyors of fear. They are probably lying.”
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 862 – SOCIALISNT—The ugly truth about socialism
May292024
Socialism is promoted by most of its supporters as a compassionate ‘redistribution’ of wealth, when in fact socialism isn’t compassionate at all. The truly remarkable thing about socialism is that it has a 100% failure rate when it comes to improving the lives of those living under socialism. Yet its popularity persists.
That’s because socialism is a pyramid scheme that appears to benefit the first generation of people who adopt it – at the cost of future generations who receive no benefits but must pay all the costs. Ours is that future generation.
For example, the photo accompanying this post illustrates just one instance of how socialism looks in London Ontario in 2024. Drug addicted and homeless people clutter the streets everywhere. Scenes like this were unthinkable only a few years ago.
The Canadian Press recently reported on the results of a poll in which one third of Canadians approve of Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID) for homeless people. That so many people would approve of killing the homeless is tragic evidence of how deeply the Left’s death cult has taken root. And as we have been learning, MAID is far from being a guarantee of painless death: As observed by Kelsi Sheren in her conversation with Jordan Peterson: “MAID is a terrifying way to die.”
Similarly, socialism is a terrifying way for societies and cultures to die. As an ideological variant of the Left, the ugly truth about socialism is that it is simply another death cult. History has repeatedly demonstrated this and still, in light of this knowledge and experience, millions around the world continue to proudly call themselves socialists.
The antidote to socialism is capitalism, but most fear to acknowledge this because capitalism is Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
In a speech delivered before the Institute Of Public Affairs in Australia, writer and podcaster Brendan O’Neill suggested that ‘lockdown amnesia’ is a consequence of the shame people experienced during the Covid lockdowns.
Based on his observations that many people have completely forgotten some of the most outrageous violations of individual rights and freedoms perpetrated by governments during the Covid lockdowns – including the lockdowns themselves – O’Neill contends that “the state is complicit in cultivating this culture of forgetting.”
His view is reminiscent of Ches Crosbie‘s (of Canada’s National Citizens Inquiry) call to end the “censorship industrial complex” that he identified as also being complicit in cultivating a culture of fear and ignorance. “It must be eliminated before the truth reaches enough people and a proper reconciliation can be pursued.”
The censorship industrial complex is indeed ‘complex’ and can be said to include the ‘amnesia industry’ and the intentional manipulation of memory.
But one must wonder how much of the impetus ‘to forget’ is actually driven by shame or how much is driven by the fear of being held accountable. Either way, it appears that a great reckoning is on the horizon.
As more and more of the destructive and negative consequences of everything to do with the lockdowns become impossible to ignore and avoid, attempting to erase the causal history behind all of the destruction appears to be a viable backup strategy to keep a significant part of the public in the dark.
“It is an abomination to forget what happened,” warns O’Neill, “It is essential to remember to protect ourselves from the possibility it will happen again in the future.”
Perhaps the most chilling aspect of the entire ‘culture of forgetting’ is the number of people who have forgotten what is Just Right, and in so doing, have just Left themselves to be manipulated by those who would destroy them.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 860 – Death traps—from euthanasia to environmentalism
May152024
Question: What does Canada’s MAID (Medical Assistance In Dying) program have in common with environmentalism? Answer: They are both prescriptions for death and depopulation.
Canada is sadly among a growing number of nations intentionally murdering their own citizens. Strong words? Hard to believe?
Says Britain’s Dr. Vernon Coleman: “This is the most evil cold blooded massacre since Genghis Kahn made genocide fashionable. Forget the self-serving myth that euthanasia is painless and dignified.”
And on the environmental front, in announcing the release of Canada’s ‘Federal Plastics Registry,’ it was described as an “important demonstration of Canada’s commitment to end pollution and build a circular economy.” Continue reading »
In their attempt to dismiss or ignore narratives and truths that conflict with the ideology of the Left, the term ‘far right’ has been used as a pejorative to silence the opposition.
‘Far right’ is an anti-concept. It is based on a fictional political spectrum that simply does not exist, either in theory or in practice. Left and Right do not exist on either end of a ‘spectrum’ but are strictly polarities representing the opposing political conditions of tyranny (on the Left) and freedom (on the Right).
‘Far right’ implies that there are other types or ‘degrees’ of Right. However, the values represented by the political polarities of Left and Right do not exist in ‘degree’ but only in ‘kind’. There is no ‘middle of the road’ and any compromise between Left and Right can only benefit the Left, as the Right (the good) has nothing to gain from the Left (the evil) in such a compromise. This has been the political trend for many decades.
In the information war, as in any war, it’s “Define or ‘be’ defined.” Unfortunately, those on the Right (meaning those in favor of freedom and capitalism) have come to lack both the vocabulary and proper definitions to articulate their values, and this was not by accident or omission. The Left has been hard at work destroying the very concepts necessary to articulate these values. Continue reading »
Conservatism is being promoted as a Christian political philosophy that should be applied to the governing of a country. That, at least, was the expressed opinion of David Haskell (Wilfred Laurier University) during his recent debate with Bruce Pardy (Queen’s Law).
Sponsored by Augustine College and First Freedoms Foundation, the 2024 Rand Debate (named after Canadian Supreme Court Justice Ivan Rand), was based on the following resolution: “Be it resolved that, as Wokeism destroys the West, the first responsibility of government is to foster a virtuous society, rather than protect individual liberty.”
In addition to the resolution itself being based on a contradiction (pitting “virtue” against “liberty” when in fact they are inseparable), the debate serves as an ideal exhibit of what we have been referring to as the “political dyslexia” persistently surrounding political debates and discussions.
Most disturbing is the Christian ‘virtue signaling’ now literally being advocated as a political response to the politics of WOKE virtue signaling.
David Haskell argues that through the power of the state, “conservatism as guided by the Judeo-Christian tradition is going to make choices you don’t agree with, especially if you’re not a religious believer.” Bruce Pardy, in response, notes that “this is why so many progressives think that conservatives are dangerous.”
Given Haskell’s subjective definitions of words like ‘liberal’, ‘virtue’, ‘equality’, ‘utilitarian’, and many others including ‘conservatism’ itself, Haskell and Pardy could never have arrived at anything resembling agreement. This creates a deep and unnecessary divide between those fighting for ‘liberty’ and those fighting for ‘conservatism’ in their mutual war against ‘Wokeism.’
Until more people who regard themselves as ‘conservatives’ begin to use definitions that are Just Right, their proposed solutions for defeating the WOKE ideology, let alone for achieving freedom, will always be just wrong and ineffective.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 857 – Political dyslexia—causes and cures
Apr242024
The disdain and revulsion that many people have developed for politics is understandable. But a growing danger emanating from this attitude is the inability to conceive of any political solutions to our freedom dilemma, and to withdraw from the political process entirely.
This is particularly tragic for those on the political Right – the polarity of individualism, freedom, and capitalism – because most people who believe in these values have demonstrated little interest in politics. And to the extent that they do participate in the political process, they more often than not continue to support and vote for parties and candidates opposed to their values.
Most voters are so confused about politics that they still cannot tell Left from Right, a condition perhaps best described as political dyslexia.
In fact, the prevailing myth is that there is no difference between Left and Right, based on the mistaken assumption that political parties like Canada’s Conservative Party and America’s Republican Party are on the ‘Right’ when they are actually as Leftist as their liberal and democratic counterparts.
Consider the political awakening of Rosanne Barr who, in a recent discussion with Russell Brand, described her 2012 candidacy for president as leader of the Green Party as “socialist.” Remarkably, she associated “freedom of speech, civil rights, self improvement through education, and individual rights” with socialism and the Left. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 856 – ATHEISNT—Fallacies And Realities About Atheists
Apr172024
Atheist Richard Dawkins recently sparked a controversy that challenges fundamental assumptions about both atheism and faith-based belief. Referring to himself as a “cultural Christian” he has been criticized by both atheists and religious believers alike.
Unfortunately, too many self-described atheists are being unfairly criticized and maligned by those who, on the one side, equate atheism with an absence of morality, while on the other equate the sharing of some religious beliefs with unprincipled atheism.
One dictionary we consulted incorrectly defines ‘atheism’ as “the belief that there is no god.” The problem with this definition is that atheism is not a ‘belief’ system at all. Nor is atheism a philosophy or code of morality. It is merely the non-acceptance or a rejection of the concept of a literal supernatural ‘deity’ – nothing else. Atheism does not require ‘belief’ as its base of justification. Atheism is primarily a response to theism, which does rely on ‘faith’ and ‘belief.’
The fact that many atheists abide by a moral code that mirrors that associated with Christianity is less about atheists borrowing from Christian values than it is about Christians and atheists alike borrowing values from other shared philosophical sources. This includes many writers and philosophers throughout history setting out the principles of Western culture over time – from the early Greeks through the Age of Enlightenment and to the present day.
Those who blame atheism as being the source of our current tyrannical zeitgeist – or who blame the Soviet Union’s past tyrannical history on its ‘officially atheist status’ are arguing a contradiction. One cannot judge any individual or national actions on what is ‘not’ believed and practiced but on what ‘is’ believed and practiced. In both cases, the cause of the tyranny was (and is) the ideology of collectivism.
Today’s WOKE ideology is merely the latest label given to yesterday’s Marxist ideology – and religious affiliation or lack thereof has little to do with the support of such ideologies. The same principle holds true for freedom.
Whether atheist or religious, if one accepts and respects the principles of individualism, individual rights and freedom, then it is possible for people of every belief and non-belief to share the ideals and blessings of a society that’s Just Right, with the understanding that freedom of religion also includes the right to be free from religion.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 855 – Do you mind?—thinking about thinking
Apr102024
There has recently been a growing concern and much discussion about why so many people are still not awake, but just remain WOKE in the face of a pending civilizational collapse. “The WOKE mind virus is the greatest existential threat faced by humanity,” concludes Gad Saad, and Elon Musk apparently shares his alarm.
Among other causes cited for this sad state of affairs are the inability to have an inner monologue, the effect of the Covid spike protein, fear mongering, bacteria, chronic infection, the fake news media, intelligence guided by irrational bias, and of course the WOKE ideology, to name but a few.
Missing from most of the discussions is the ‘means’ by which people actually think: through the use of concepts and language. Because the human mind is essentially ‘programmable,’ and because words and concepts are the ‘software’ on which each mind functions, humans in the exercise of free will have the capacity and choice to think and behave either rationally or irrationally.
An irrational concept is one that does not conform to reality or reason. And significantly, irrational concepts can be held by highly intelligent people. How is this possible? Continue reading »
Comments Off on 854 – No peace in the foreseeable future | Jacob Peretz
Apr032024
“There will be no peace in Israel’s foreseeable future” predicts our guest Jacob Peretz.
His pessimism is based not only on current events or on the history of the region, but also on personal experience. His regret over saving the life of a wounded Egyptian soldier during the Yom Kippur war speaks to a growing sense of hopelessness regarding any prospects of peace or brotherhood between Jews and those who relentlessly disparage and attack them.
In speculating beyond the “foreseeable” future, Jacob notes that there are forty-eight Arab states in the United Nations, states that do not have any interest in pursuing peace with Israel. In making this observation, he has also identified the fundamental evil nature of the United Nations, which was described by Ayn Rand many decades ago (and not in reference to Israel):
“There is no margin of error about a monstrosity that was created for the alleged purpose of preventing wars by uniting the world against any aggressor, but proceeded to unite it against any victim of aggression.
“Who but a concrete-bound epistemological savage could have expected any other results from such an ‘experiment in collaboration’? What would you expect from a crime fighting committee whose board of directors included the leading gangsters of the community?”
What we need is not a “United Nations,” but an international organization of “United Democratic Nations,” suggests Jacob, and until such a body emerges, any organization with members opposed to freedom and democracy can only be a threat to peace, not a vehicle for peace.
Meanwhile, as the global debate continues to rage, Israel’s military efforts continue to escalate – demonstrating that predictions of “no peace in the foreseeable future” are proving to be Just Right, as tragic as that reality may be.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 853 – Israel reconsidered—in the light of history
Mar272024
In his March 4 essay entitled Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus* – The Chronicle of Zionist lies and their implosion foreseen, Salim Mansur concludes that the Balfour Declaration which created the state of Israel has no legal standing.
Given Israel’s current military actions in Palestine and the recent International Court of Justice‘s (ICJ) provisional judgement finding it “plausible” that Israel is violating the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, events suggest that Israel’s “false history” is rapidly catching up with its present.
That history includes the publication of Theodor Herzl‘s book, ‘The Jewish State’ with its “plan” for Zionism, how the Balfour Declaration was implemented, the suppression of the King-Crane Commission report, the Alfred Dreyfus case and the controversial opinions of figures like Edwin Montagu.
When Salim suggests that “a settlement will come within the context of a false history,” he is not solely referring to any possible ‘court’ settlements regarding the state of Israel, but to the inevitable continuum of history. Although various historical narratives are often shown to be false, actual historical events themselves nevertheless unfold on the reality of the past, not on the political fictions. “It’s karma.”
Even when not recognized as such, the reality of truth exerts its own deterministic force against intentions and efforts to hide truths that, given enough time, eventually surface. Since the study of history is a discipline dealing with related events through passages of time, an accurate history becomes an indispensable necessity in establishing any understanding of the present.
Global pressures and public opinion against Israel continue to build, and now even include Donald Trump‘s cautionary warning to wrap up its mission in Palestine. Whether or not Israel maintains (or perhaps improves) its status and international respect as a state is unpredictable. But a “settlement will come” and it will be interesting to see if that settlement proves to be one that is Just Right – irrespective of any false histories.
* Latin “False in one, false in all.”
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 852 – Primacy—consciousness or existence?
Mar202024
“In politics, perception is reality, the truth doesn’t matter.”
Given the broad acceptance of this view of politics, it should not be surprising that so many good people see politics as an evil. They thus avoid getting involved in a process that affects everyone’s life whether they are interested in politics or not.
But this viewpoint is itself a form of political propaganda because in reality the truth does indeed matter in politics, so much so that political interests which are not aligned with truth go to such great lengths to hide and/or misrepresent the truth. Those political views are broadly identified as coming from the Left, which represents many variants of collectivism.
For those on the Right (which represents individualism, freedom, and capitalism), the current state of politics has become so irrational and beyond understanding that it is almost impossible to accept that the tyranny we are experiencing is real. “Everything is upside down or totally backwards,” has become a familiar refrain expressing this frustration and disbelief.
To understand the madness of the political Left, it is necessary to know how those on the Left think. One of the most difficult concepts to grasp is that those on the Left are strictly ideological, not philosophical. Ideology originates strictly in the mind, unconcerned with the facts of reality. A working philosophy on the other hand, is disciplined by the facts of reality.
In philosophy, these two opposing ways of thinking are contrasted as the ‘primacy of consciousness’ (in which reality is not perceived by consciousness but is created by consciousness) and the ‘primacy of existence’ (in which reality exists irrespective of anyone’s consciousness).
In politics, it is the Left that relies on ideology, while the Right relies on philosophical principles.
Consequently, this conflict between Left and Right manifests itself in a battle of definitions and concepts, ranging from the definition of freedom to the definition of democracy. While those on the Left are obsessed with “defending democracy,” many on the Right insist that freedom is the primary value to be defended.
While freedom is indeed the primary value, the surprising truth is that freedom and democracy go hand-in-hand.
Unfortunately, even when the truth is told, most people cannot recognize it or distinguish it from all of the false perceptions about politics. To be understood in a light that is Just Right, truth must be discerned; it requires a process of thought and discipline that too few understand: philosophy.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
From the 19th-century Pale of Settlement, to the writings of Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, to the ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip, Professor Salim Mansur and Robert Vaughan delve into the significance of Zionism’s history and the establishment of Israel in comprehending contemporary events in the Middle East.
Your financial support is always appreciated and is what makes our programming possible.
E-Transfer your donation to feedback@justrightmedia.org
Or via PayPal
Comments Off on 851 – Political atheism—the loss of faith in democracy
Mar132024
Could you be a ‘political atheist’ without even knowing it?
Political atheists are those who have either completely lost their faith in what they believed to be the democratic system, or never had such faith in the first place. Unfortunately, most of these people tend to be found on the Right.
Unlike those on the Left who remain eternally and consistently politically active and therefore monopolize the electoral process, too many on the Right remain uninvolved in any meaningful political process. They may vote during elections from time to time, but even then, they end up voting for candidates of the Left – the Leftist they consider to be the ‘lesser of a given number of evils.’ Even when a true identifiable freedom candidate of the Right is on the ballot, most ‘right-wingers’ still vote Left: “He’ll never get elected.”
And then there are those who never vote or never participate in politics whatsoever. Taken together, these voters and non-voters alike can be considered to be ‘political atheists’ in that they really have no faith in the possibility that anything positive can result from politics. Given the zeitgeist of the day, this is an understandable, though false, belief.
The one reality about politics that no one can escape is the fact that even if you’re not interested in politics, politics is always interested in you. Those who regard themselves as ‘apolitical’ are in fact no less political than any political zealot. Being ‘apolitical’ is just another political ideology. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 850 – The spoken to—Censorship’s true target
Mar062024
Once again, Canada’s politicians are on the ‘banning hate speech’ bandwagon, this time in the guise of a piece of legislation being introduced into parliament as Bill C-63.
The proposals contained in Bill C-63 are so bizarre and outrageous that most would dismiss them outright. Like something out of a science-fiction horror fantasy, the bill allows the government to convict, fine, and imprison ‘for life’ people who have not committed any speech offense, but who may do so in the future. Seriously.
How are such people to be identified? Through a ‘complaint’ system in which the identity of the complainant is kept a secret. The complainant can be anyone. As explained by Ezra Levant, “a person may lay an information if he fears that another person will commit a speech offense in the future.” And that’s just the tip of the iceberg of Bill C-63’s unconscionable and immoral proposals.
But more frightening than the contents of the bill itself are the people who would even allow themselves to entertain such evil. Former Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault, who drafted the law, has announced that the government also has a “nuclear option” by being able to make it impossible to access any specific website in the country.
The Trudeau government’s obsession with regulating and censoring the internet suggests that he and his government greatly fear the truth. Truth is, after all, what is being eliminated from any allowable public discussion.
The real immorality of censorship is not just in the fact that it violates the fundamental right of someone to speak freely (which it does) but also because it violates the fundamental rights of those who wish to hear and listen freely. Censorship is less about the speaker than it is about the ‘spoken to’. The speaker is already in possession of the truth; the ‘spoken to’ may not be aware of the truth, and that’s how the politicians of the Left want to keep it.
Given that the Left is always unable to defend its ideology on intellectual or moral grounds, censorship is a great way to avoid that responsibility: “When persuasion fails, just use force.” Censorship is the perfect weapon of violence for those consumed with irrational hatreds that they do not wish to have exposed.
This should not be surprising because when it comes to ‘hate,’ the Left hates individualism, freedom, free speech, private property rights, justice, capitalism, and anybody or anything that is Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 849 – Applied philosophy—the practicality of freedom
Feb282024
In their struggle against tyranny, many dismiss ‘philosophy’ while calling for ‘practical’ solutions to a condition that is wholly the consequence of ideas – and ideology. Given that the predominant zeitgeist of today’s culture is primarily on the Left, it should not be surprising that the field of philosophy has been largely discredited and dismissed as a failed subjective approach to the problems and challenges of life. However, this is a tragic error.
Reality dictates that one cannot possibly separate the philosophical from the practical without encountering a contradiction. If the ‘theory’ does not match the ‘practice’ then the ‘theory’ is no longer valid and cannot be regarded as such. The proper response is not to dismiss all ‘theory’ out of hand, but to formulate a theory that does indeed match the practice.
In the fields of ethics and politics, ‘theory’ is often equated with ‘philosophy’ or ‘ideology.’ Each of these terms is properly associated with modes of thinking that lead to certain intended outcomes or results.
So why do so many applied ‘theories’ fail to result in their intended outcomes? For a simple reason: the ‘theories’ are based on a mode of thinking philosophically referred to as the “primacy of consciousness” which stands in direct opposition to the “primacy of existence.” Continue reading »
Comments Off on 848 – Witness to betrayal—the National Citizens Inquiry | Ches Crosbie
Feb212024
As victims of COVID-19 government policies, each of the witnesses who testified before Canada’s National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) shared their own unique experience and personal tragic consequences. But what they all truly witnessed in common was the official betrayal of Canadians on a scale once thought to be unimaginable.
Released on November 28, 2023, the final report of the NCI’s Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada permanently places on the record the Canadian government’s intentional misinformation and disinformation campaigns about the COVID-19 pandemic. What is undeniably clear is that Canadians were betrayed by all of their institutions and politicians.
As our guest Ches Crosbie notes, the “censorship industrial complex” must be eliminated before the truth reaches enough people and a proper reconciliation can be pursued. And significantly, the testimonies and information found in the final report can serve as a resource for other betrayed victims who have yet to seek some kind of justice. It is a treasure trove of information for litigation purposes.
Given that the truth is now visible to anyone who cares to look, a call for reconciliation appears to be the next step in the direction that is Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
The COVID-19 pandemic plunged Canada into a culture of fear and panic, marked by egregious violations of individual rights not seen since times of war. One might assume that the federal and provincial governments would have faced opposition to their unjustified and tyrannical measures aimed at curbing the spread of what amounted to nothing more than a severe flu. However, they did not. Instead, all of “officialdom” supported the measures taken, and anyone who questioned those measures were tormented, canceled, and vilified. Some were even beaten, arrested, and imprisoned.
In turbulent times Canadians normally turn to the mainstream media to pose challenging questions regarding the actions of government, pursue a balanced approach to the available “expert” information, and at the very least document the experiences of Canadians. Not this time. The mainstream media, receiving funding by the federal government since 2019, completely failed Canadians. No probing questions were asked, no alternative opinions were offered, and the negative effects of government actions were ignored. Some legacy media outlets even stooped to inciting hatred and encouraging Canadians to turn on those who did not share the official narrative.
With the lack of responsibility and probity on the part of Canadian officials, institutions, and media, it fell to the People themselves to document the effects of the government’s overreach and offer solutions.
The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) marked a first for Canada. Citizen-led and funded it traversed the county gathering the heartbreaking stories of 305 victims, the testimony of 94 experts in law and medicine, and over 76,000 signatures on a petition of support.
Ches Crosbie, a Canadian Lawyer and spokesman for the NCI, joins Robert Vaughan to discuss some of the recommendations of the NCI’s final report: Inquiry into the Appropriateness and Efficacy of the COVID-19 Response in Canada, released November 28, 2023, and the disregard of the report by those who would benefit most from its findings.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider donating:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 847 – Rules of the game—of definitions
Feb142024
A Jan 26 2024 provisional judgement finding it “plausible” that Israel is violating the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide has unleashed yet another epistemological conflict in which the two sides of the debate have been polarized over the valid definition of a concept, in this case, the word “genocide.”
Rendered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the judgement was made in response to an application filed against Israel by South Africa. Though the definition of “genocide” used by the ICJ is far broader and, to the minds of many, invalid relative to its long accepted “dictionary” definition, this objection fails to recognize the “rules of the game” that were accepted by each of its players long before the first move was made.
“It happens. That’s politics,” explains our guest Salim Mansur in describing the apparent injustice and unequal application of the rules to differing players in the game. As America and other nations escape judgment, Israel appears to be unduly targeted for “genocidal” activities no different from those nations with “veto” power.
In light of the fact that each of the governments involved are signatories to the conditions and definitions being adjudicated, it is important to understand the rules of the definition game in which they are engaged, before attempting to apply definitions and standards proven to be Just Right for most of us not playing games.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Tucker Carlson’s interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin did not reveal groundbreaking insights into the leader or his policies to those of us who have been closely monitoring events in that region. However, it did bring to light previously overlooked facts to hundreds of millions, courtesy of a journalist committed to honesty, in stark contrast to the West’s dismissive yellow press.
In this insightful discussion, Professor Emeritus, Salim Mansur and Robert Vaughan delve into the interview’s implications, exploring its impact on a global audience that is typically shielded from the truth but now finds itself unexpectedly confronted with reality, thanks to a journalist who values integrity.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider making a donation:
🧡 PayPal
When the International Court of Justice (ICJ) announced that it found it “plausible” that Israel is violating the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, many immediately drew parallels to the Holocaust, suggesting that Israel’s actions were akin to the treatment of Jews under Nazi Germany.
However, this interpretation is not accurate. The common understanding of “genocide” as the “systematic extermination” of a group of people does not align with the definition in the UN’s Convention, nor is it the definition under scrutiny by the ICJ.
In UN law, “genocide” encompasses a broad range of actions, including killing any number of people in a defined group, even a single person, or causing serious mental harm to a member of the group. This expansive definition implies that nations involved in any conflict, anywhere, at any time could potentially face allegations of “genocide.”
Professor Salim Mansur from Western University joins us to explore the implications of the ICJ’s provisional decision and its potential impact on the very existence of the state of Israel.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider making a donation:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 846 – United Freedom Party of Alberta—neither united nor free
Feb072024
Due to the emergence of an officially registered party in Alberta called the United Freedom Party (UFP), we find ourselves forced to conduct some damage control given our own association with Ontario’s officially registered Freedom Party. The two parties have literally nothing in common.
Organizers of the UFP, Luke Denis and Chris Hampton, have described themselves as “extreme right wing Christian conservatives,” whose key agenda includes the advancement of anarchy, libertarianism and the socialistic redistribution of wealth. Citing the “fifth greater re-set event being held right now, from the libertarian sector and the yellow and black anarchist types,” they attribute the current functionality of society on “some kind of magic hootenanny.” Seriously.
Unable to offer an objective definition of political freedom, the UFP organizers suggest that freedom is “the ability to do whatever one wants, so long as it does not ‘harm’ other individuals or the environment.” Among the ‘harms’ it includes in this definition is, for example, the inability or failure of a private road contractor to meet the financial or construction obligations of its contracted agreements. They appear to be unaware that using the so-called ‘harm’ argument to justify restricting freedom was the very ground on which everything from covid injections to wearing masks to mandated lockdowns was justified.
For the most part, the UFP’s perspective on politics and the economy is incoherent, contradictory, and so bizarrely oblivious to any kind of consistency or civilized standard that it is difficult to comprehend what kind of people would support such madness. The principle of justice, due process, or consent is nowhere to be found in their rhetoric. “We don’t need their bloody permission” they say of their fellow Albertans.
At one point it was suggested that Bill Gates should have been “murdered and ripped apart on stage.” They see people like Tucker Carlson and Douglas Murray as mostly “controlled opposition.”
Among the UFP’s bizarrely contradictory and anti-freedom proposals are the following:
The UFP would institute an across-the-board 3% resource tax and provide all Albertans with cheques drawn upon that account “because these are natural resources that we should share.”
In a pure Joe Biden open border policy, the party would “flood the province of Alberta with millions of people from outside the province (doubling Alberta’s population) who would theoretically support and vote for “unity” and “solidarity” though no means of vetting such people was deemed necessary. At the same time the party would expel all current Albertans who disagree with the party’s policies: “Get the ‘f’ out.”
On the democratic front, there is simply no way to reconcile or make sense of the party’s utterly contradictory and illogical proposals. On the one hand they would “remove the power of politicians” to legislate, and would “end the voting process after the UFP is voted into power.” On the other hand, they would encourage people to “vote more furiously in all the time honored ways of voting.” The UFP would also be in favor of “forming a new country” in the province of Alberta and within other jurisdictions around the world.
While they pay lip service to “private education” they claim the right to “educate the sheep” and “if you don’t like it get the ‘f’ out.”
And all this is just the tip of the iceberg of the UFP’s irrationality.
Claiming that ‘unity’ and ‘solidarity’ are their central concerns, one must question the motives of a party that would register in a province where there are already a myriad of conservative splinter groups with those same objectives, including Artur Pawlowski’s political party which had already successfully registered candidates in all of Alberta’s ridings.
Given the utter irrationality and contradictory statements made by the UFP, it’s beginning to look like the only way to define Alberta’s UFP in a way that’s Just Right is as some kind of psyop designed to disrupt and destroy any opposition to the existing regime.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 845 – Politics is simple—it’s just not easy
Feb012024
The spectacle of thousands of political protesters gathering to “fight tyranny” without having a clue as to how this might be done can only lead to continued tyranny ahead. Though accomplished and expert in their own fields of discipline – whether medicine, law, education, journalism, etc. – most of the leading voices in the “freedom movement” are clueless when it comes to the politics of freedom.
It’s one thing to be able to identify the political condition (tyranny) you’re running ‘from,’ it is quite another to identify the political condition (freedom) you must move ‘towards.’ Calls for ‘unity’ or ‘solidarity’ or for ‘political separation,’ or for ‘creating a republic’ or for ‘changing the electoral system’ are not calls for establishing a free society. They are desperate aimless propositions that amount to a clear admission that the protesters really don’t know what must be done.
This is completely understandable. Most people pay no attention to politics until it is too late. Fortunately, one group that has discovered the fundamental principles necessary to the advancement of individual freedom is the Freedom Party of Ontario, established on January 1, 1984.
A brief review of the party’s myriad of successes in changing and affecting the laws of Ontario makes two things clear: (1) that winning individual battles against the deep state and the political parties of the day is doable, if one employs the proper principles and tactics, and (2) that Canada’s tyranny today is no different than it has been for the past half century and longer. In every respect, municipal, federal and provincial governments in Canada were as abusive of their power and authority in the 1980s as they are today.
Protesting against tyranny and oppression certainly has some limited value. But preventing the next wave of tyranny and oppression demands a political discipline currently not seen in the political arena – one ‘for’ freedom, not merely ‘against’ the latest manifestations of state injustice.
The war for freedom can only be won by those who understand and act on the singular set of freedom based principles that are Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 844 – The empire strikes out | Salim Mansur
Jan242024
“A republic, if you can keep it.” Benjamin Franklin’s famous response (Sept 1787) to Elizabeth Willing Powel’s question: “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” was as much a warning as it was a description of an ideal America as a state in which the sovereignty resides in the people and the legislative and administrative powers are lodged in officers elected by them.
It is now 2024 and the republic to which he referred no longer exists. Were he alive today Franklin might be tempted to respond with “An empire – if you can defeat it” as the means of both defining the nation and of recovering its republican status.
Our guest Salim Mansur argues that America’s descent from a free republic to a coercive empire was accelerated and completed during the period between the election of Woodrow Wilson in 1912 and the installation of Joe Biden in 2020. “We are now in a post-constitutional America,” he says.
America’s republican status was dismantled thanks to the imposition of the federal income tax, the 17th amendment which “democratized” the election of senators, the establishment of the federal reserve (1913) and other legislation making “America now the world’s biggest threat to individual rights.”
As an empire, America suffers from the “disease of the empire” which Salim describes as a nullification of freedom at home and the coercion of people abroad. Ultimately all empires are little more than military rule.
Despite all of this corruption and power, the good news is that the vast majority of “we the people” has begun to see America and its global empire for what it has become. With world-wide protests and demonstrations against their own politicians, to say nothing of the unprecedented popularity of Donald Trump, the rulers of the empire are beginning to be uncomfortably aware that their empire may soon be struck out.
For that reason, we are in “uncharted waters” when it comes to predicting what the empire’s elites may do to strike back in their state of desperation. It looks like 2024 will be the decisive year in which Americans will choose between living in an empire or in a constitutional republic. So far it looks like they’ll choose to do what is Just Right by striking out an empire and choosing to keep a republic as their home’s base.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Upon leaving the Constitutional Convention of 1787 Benjamin Franklin was asked about the kind of government created by him and the other delegates. His response was, “A republic, if you can keep it.”
If Franklin were alive today he would say that the American People had failed. What initially started out as a bold experiment in liberty has transformed into an empire engaged in a “Forever War,” led by the very type of elites the War of Independence was waged to overthrow.
Our guest, Professor Salim Mansur, has described the United States of 2024 as a “rogue state” and the most dangerous enemy of freedom based on individual rights.
Salim puts the start of the Republic’s fall in 1912 with the election of Democrat Woodrow Wilson. It was under Wilson that the 17th Amendment to the Constitution had US Senators elected by the People rather than by the legislatures of the states they were supposed to represent, altering a key aspect of the Republican nature of the country. This change made the Senators no different than the elected members of the House of Representatives.
Adding to Wilson’s ignominious administrative term was the signing of the Federal Reserve Act and the 16th Amendment, which allowed for a federal income tax. No longer did the federal government require the financial backing and consent of the States to wage war. Upon his reelection in 1916 and with these new tools at his disposal, Wilson quickly entered into the Great War already waging in Europe.
If one were to bracket the fall of the Republic at one end with Wilson’s Administration, on this end of history the other bracket would be the installation of the Usurper Joe Biden, installed into the position of President during a ceremony attended not by the American People, but by a select group of elites in a Capital surrounded by razor wire and 25,000 armed guardsmen.
There could be no greater nor obvious symbolism than that spectacle to demonstrate that Franklin’s Republic has fallen and that a New World Order headed by an American Empire has begun.
The video is also available on the following platforms:
Comments Off on 843 – The missionary position—on sex, politics, and religion
Jan182024
“We’re far more divided than we thought – between people who see freedom as God defines it and those who see freedom as they define it.” So declared one Christian spokesman regarding the current “freedom alliance” on the Right.
Surprisingly, his concern was primarily based on differing sexual attitudes and lifestyles: “God created marriage for one man and one woman, for life, and any sex outside of that is a sin and against nature.”
While this choice of lifestyle is perfectly legitimate for those who choose to adopt it, turning it in to a point of division between those who differ is tragically self-defeating. It is as if to argue that no political alliance is possible unless everyone in that alliance uses the missionary position. This is a complete non sequitur in the greater war on tyranny, where the only consensus required for alliance is the acceptance of individual freedom.
Different attitudes on sexuality are unnecessarily divisive when brought into any political sphere or arena. By sexuality in this context we mean disagreements over consentual lifestyle choices, not on the tyranny of gender politics.
Thanks to gender identity politics, sexuality has become yet another area of disagreement and division. But gender politics is not about sex or about sexuality. It is about creating division and conflict in the political arena.
It’s unfortunate that some in the religious community are using their own personal sexual beliefs to create further division. Complete unanimity between differing religious groups, faiths and those who profess no specific religious views is not a necessity in the broader war against the current tyranny.
The current “freedom alliance” need not be threatened from within. All it takes to keep it intact is a consensus of freedom that is Just Right for everyone.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
“When you’re dead, you don’t know you’re dead. The pain is felt by others. The same thing happens when you’re stupid.” And to explicitly conclude the thought of that popular meme: “When you’re stupid and you don’t know it, the pain is felt by others.”
The truth of that statement strikes at the heart of what was experienced in Nazi Germany, thanks to the seemingly willing support that so many German people gave to Hitler. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a German Lutheran pastor theologian and anti-Nazi dissident, believed that this was a not a consequence of malice, but of widespread stupidity.
While in a German prison during the Hitler years, he formulated a theory arguing that we must seek to understand the nature of stupidity as stupidity is not an intellectual defect, but a moral one. Stupidity, therefore, is a much more dangerous enemy than malice because one can expose malice and argue against it and even use force to stop it, but this is not possible when dealing with stupidity.
One has but to look at all of the utterly stupid ideas and causes (and quite demonstrably so) being supported in today’s zeitgeist. From Covid to climate change, these stupid fictions continue to be believed by a significant number of people who, as a result, become a danger not only to others but to themselves as well. But having chosen to be stupid, they are oblivious to this reality.
Moreover, this phenomenon of stupidity, observed Bonhoeffer, is most predominant among people living in groups and collectives, and very rare in independent individuals or those who generally live alone. This suggests a strong psychological force at play, and goes a long way towards explaining why the collectivist Left (communism/socialism/fascism) promotes so many genuinely stupid and immoral ideas, policies and ideologies.
Upon a review of the evidence, it would appear that Bonhoeffer’s theory that stupidity is a moral defect turns out to be Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Sometimes our philosophical assumptions and beliefs can be challenged by the most unexpected and seemingly trivial events. To illustrate this, we offer a remarkable true story about a lowly housefly named ‘Myfly’ and what it tells us about human nature.
The story has encouraged us to re-examine some long accepted philosophical principles, like the one that postulates that truth is that which reflects and corresponds to reality. But is that really ‘true’? Might it be possible for something to be true, but not necessarily real? Is there a distinction between the ‘real’ and ‘reality’? These are but a few of the questions considered in our first presentation of 2024,and we hope and trust that everyone had a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
Given all of the dire predictions and expectations for this new year, being able to distinguish between narratives that are true or false becomes all the more urgent and necessary. The science devoted to the discovery of the proper methods of acquiring and validating knowledge is known as epistemology.
In both politics and war the first rule is to define or be defined and in so doing, control the narrative. Through the application of valid epistemological principles. false narratives can easily be identified and discredited without having to resort to censorship and other means of speech restrictions.
If it is true that the narrative is all, then clearly those on the Right must endeavour to spread those narratives known to be Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider donating:
🧡 PayPal
The Oct 7th, 2023 atrocities committed on Israeli civilians by Gaza’s Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) prompted widespread expression of sympathy towards the people of Israel. However, as Israel responded to this act of terrorism to bring Hamas and its supporters to justice, the narrative quickly shifted to a surge of anti-Semitism.
In a candid conversation, Jewish-Canadian businessman Irving Weisdorf and Robert Vaughan delve into the origins of anti-Semitism, the historical context leading to the establishment of the state of Israel, and the complex dynamics of the insatiable animosity held by many Arab Palestinians towards their Jewish neighbours.
Your donations are greatly appreciated and are what makes our programming possible:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 840 – Singing against the reign of tyranny—More music that’s Just Right
Dec282023
As 2023 draws to a close and an anticipated turbulent 2024 comes with an expectation of escalated assaults on individual freedom, one positive trend has been a growing cultural resistance to the tyranny and its many manifestations. If it’s true that politics is ‘downstream from culture,’ then it is beginning to appear that the Left’s dominance of the cultural mosaic is finally encountering some meaningful competition from the Right.
Fundamental to classifying any artistic expression as being Just Right is the understanding that all such expression values individual freedom and/or condemns tyranny.
Increasingly, more and more musical artists are finding themselves on the Right by singing out on behalf of freedom. As both a form of protest and critical analysis, the combination of the Right words with the Right music can prove to powerfully and emotionally reflect the changing zeitgeist of the day in a way otherwise not possible.
Our first two unique and distinctive musical collections defying the propaganda of the day can be found archived on our site with the broadcasts of Just Right-738-December 23, 2021 and Just Right-817-June 29, 2023. It is in the spirit of this growing awakening that we now dedicate a third broadcast devoted to yet another unique and distinctive collection of music that’s Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Since October 7 the attack on Israel by Hamas has dominated the world stage. Though initial global reaction sympathized with the Israeli victims, it was not long before Western public sentiment had expressed a surprising level of moral support for the actions of Hamas, accompanied by open calls for the death of Jews.
Why the Jewish culture has been so hated and condemned throughout history has never been explained in a way that can withstand the test of time. To help broaden our discussions about the nature of Israel and Jewish traditions, our guest Irving Weisdorf – as a secular Jew himself – offers his own perspective and experience within the Jewish tradition.
With a traditional stress on education and hard work combined with an ethic of “being the best that you can be,” that philosophy goes a long way towards explaining why the Jewish culture is so successful. It may also help explain the real motivation behind anti-Semitism as being a “hatred of the good for being the good,” as described by Ayn Rand.
Whether this proves to be the explanation that is Just Right is something that can only be determined in an open forum of free discussion involving the nature of good and evil itself.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Few people have actually experienced being hospitalized or the pain and discomfort that most often accompanies the need for hospitalization. That unfortunate opportunity presented itself to Just Right’s host Robert Metz who in today’s broadcast reports on that experience along with some broader observations about Canada’s socialized health care system.
London Ontario’s Victoria Hospital is a city within a city. Helicopters fly in regularly bringing patients from various parts of the province and arriving ambulances can be heard on a regular basis. But given many of the news items and stories about Canada’s health care crisis, all of this activity seems incongruous with the reports.
Beyond such considerations, the one thing most of the patients in the trauma unit share in common is the “pain factor.” How each individual reacts to pain – whether their own pain or the pain of others – can be as different as night and day. Beyond the physical trauma and challenge of being in the trauma unit of the hospital, there is also psychological stress that can lead to unexpected consequences.
Our brief investigation into one such consequence has led to a philosophical principle that strikes at the heart of human behavior.
Perhaps the greatest irony about pain is that it so often is the motivation required to push people in a direction that is Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 837 – Prelude to a massacre—The assassination of Yitzhak Rabin | Salim Mansur
Nov302023
L’chaim! A traditional Jewish toast celebrating life has taken a somber note in the Middle East, with recent events like the Hamas Massacre on October 7th and Israel’s retaliatory bombing of Gaza. The echoes of conflict reverberate through a history that traces back to the establishment of Israel by the United Nations in 1948, marking 75 years of persistent bloodshed in the region.
Despite the grim reality, a glimmer of optimism urges us to seek resolution in understanding the historical roots of this enduring rivalry. To unravel the complex narrative, Robert Vaughan engaged in a thought-provoking conversation with Professor Salim Mansur of Western University. Mansur’s recent Substack article, titled Rabin’s Murder is Prehistory of Gaza-Israel 10/7, delves into the profound changes Israel underwent from a secular state led by figures like Yitzhak Rabin to a religious state under leaders like Benjamin Netanyahu. Mansur suggests that this shift contributed to a trajectory of increased bloodshed and conflict, posing a challenge with no clear solution, possibly necessitating intervention by the United Nations.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Following the Oct 7th Hamas Massacre in Israel, there has been an increase in awareness among many young people about Osama bin Laden’s “Letter to America,” a manifesto which was published 14 months after the 9/11 attacks on America.
Most of these young individuals were too young to recall the events of that day, which occurred 22 years ago. Indeed, many were not even born. In a sense, they might be forgiven for their ignorance of Bin Laden’s encyclical and the surrounding causes and effects of Al Qaeda’s actions. However, upon learning about why bin Laden killed almost 3,000 civilians, it should be clear to most with a conscience, that there is no justification for his heinous deeds.
In his lengthy missive, Bin Laden addresses two main questions: why he attacked and what he expects Americans to do in response. He claims that America attacked first, referring to the United States’ ongoing military engagements—the so-called Forever War. This constant interference in the affairs of other nations, unrelated to America’s existential concerns, serves primarily to sustain the Military Industrial Complex. For those shocked by the revelations on platforms like TikTok, this should serve as a wake-up call.
Bin Laden’s answer to the second question is straightforward: submit to Islam or face death. In this episode, we delve into the perplexing reactions of young Americans who are only now awakening to history and discovering the malevolence within the minds of Islamists willing to kill men, women, and children for their beliefs. As Bin Laden chillingly stated, “(We) desire death more than you desire life.”
This chilling admission from a mass murderer in his Ex Post Facto Manifesto is no different from the manifestos left behind by others seeking redress for perceived wrongs through violence.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 835 – Evil is not a mental illness
Nov162023
Steven Crowder’s disclosure of the manifesto by Audrey Hale, the Covenant School shooter, has prompted some to label such heinous acts as the very definition of mental illness. However, categorizing evil solely as a mental disorder or abnormal dysfunction serves as an excuse rather than a proper understanding.
Evil deeds stem from a deliberate suspension of one’s consciousness and a rejection of critical thinking. Every individual has the potential for wrongdoing, influenced by their upbringing and the circumstances that shape their moral compass.
The Hamas Massacre on October 7 in Israel highlights that the conditions for evil exist in all people. It is only through a conscious decision to think and an act of will can we overcome the inclination to react violently to those we disagree with or those we’ve been conditioned to hate.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
In the information and propaganda war that always accompanies a physical war, maintaining the narrative is key to winning both. Today’s confusion reigning around the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is completely understandable, and has a deliberate cause.
It also has had a desired effect, observed mainly in the international moral outrage against the “terrorist Hamas” from the Right, and in international moral support for the “resistance movement Hamas” from the Left.
Disturbingly, these emotionally charged public reactions could easily be interpreted as benefiting either side of the conflict, leaving open the question of a “false flag” operation on the part of Israel – particularly in light of its open border and lack of response during the invasion on October 7.
Worse, in the din of the “this is Israel’s 9/11” chorus, one cannot help but reflect on the fact that 9/11 itself is now understood to have been a false flag event, calculated to initiate a war in the mid-east.
While it may seem callous to downplay the unspeakable atrocities committed on the Gaza strip, to do otherwise is an invitation for more of the same. After all, the very purpose behind the “shock and terror” violence is to manipulate we the people.
For those in the conflict, what matters most is controlling the narrative, and the question of whether or not the reported acts of terrorism are real, imagined, manufactured or some combination thereof is secondary. What is necessary is to have the desired narrative believed and accepted by as many as possible in order to justify yet another battle in the greater global conflict increasingly being recognized as World War III.
In order to make sense of the latest conflict a good place to start is by recognizing World War III is not a war between nations; it is a war within nations. The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is but the latest example of a fate that awaits all nations who fail to do what’s Just Right when dealing with what’s Left in their midst.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 833 – Multiculturalism—and the normalization of fascism | Salim Mansur
Oct192023
“When you cannot define something, it has no identity,” asserts our guest Salim Mansur in a statement that strikes at the heart of all politics and human rationality.
At question is the term “multiculturalism.” Salim has been calling it a “Delectable Lie” which is also the title of the book he wrote to repudiate that lie and to distinguish the natural social condition of “multi ethnicity” from the contradictory and undefinable concept of “multiculturalism.”
“Culture” describes a human collective based upon a set of commonly shared values. “Ethnicity” describes an individual, based on physical characteristics, language, religion, social tradition, and/or nation of origin, etc.
And while it is valid to say that a group of individuals sharing the same ethnicity and values can be called a “culture,” the same cannot be said about a multiple “group of cultures.” This is contradictory.
For example, if “two or more cultures” were said to share the same set of values, then by definition we would still be dealing with a single culture (i.e., Western culture). But if two or more cultures with widely differing and opposing values were to be grouped under a single identity, calling such a grouping a “culture” is an absurd contradiction because it completely invalidates the concept and definition of “culture.”
Hence, “multiculturalism” – the “ism” being key to the true nature of the concept (political), and of those who would promote it (politicians). Given the globalist agenda to destroy cultures and nationhood, the anti-concept “multiculturalism” was invented to accommodate and perpetuate a contradiction destructive to all real cultures. That contradiction is the real reason why the term can never be defined objectively.
Consequently, defining the term has been left to the subjective whims of the politicians forcing their destructive contradiction upon society, an agenda that by its nature is fascist. Thus by the simple acceptance of the term “multiculturalism” fascism itself has become normalized within the liberal cultures originally founded to prevent that from happening.
Fortunately, Salim’s warning against multiculturalism comes with a singular remedy that’s Just Right: “E pluribus unum” (Out of many, one).
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
United Kingdom Home Secretary Suella Braverman, along with other Western leaders, has shared concerns about multiculturalism, viewing it as a policy which has failed Western society. She sees it as a policy that has unintentionally led to the creation of isolated communities, where people live lives parallel to the rest of society, often challenging the institutions and laws of their host countries to promote their own collective and tribal goals.
In Canada, where multiculturalism is an official policy, we’ve witnessed the outcomes of significant, unrestricted immigration. People are bringing with them the collectivist influences of their own cultures. Whether it is the Khalistani separatists, Ukrainian Nazis, or Hamas supporters, to name but a few, the official endorsement of multiculturalism has permitted such groups to contributed to a cultural gap between the foundational classical liberal culture of the West and tribal sentiments and passions of less liberal societies.
Salim Mansur, professor emeritus at Western University, sheds light on this concerning political trend. Twelve years ago, he expressed his scholarly perspective in Delectable Lie: a liberal repudiation of multiculturalism. His views then as well as now, serve as a cautionary reminder of the potential chaos tied to the shortcomings of multiculturalism as a policy.
This video is also available on our Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee channels.
Your financial contributions are what make our programming possible:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 832 – Perpetual wars—perpetual denials
Oct122023
“The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous.” – George Orwell
Over the past week, the world’s attention has been shifted from the “war” in Ukraine to a “war” in Israel. In a matter of days, everyone’s attention shifted from the previous week’s frenzy about Canada, Russia, Ukraine and the Nazis in our midst (including Jewish Nazis), to yet another event calculated to engender global sympathy for Israel and the Jewish people.
What is happening in Israel today is directly connected to events in Ukraine; any attempt to isolate one event from the other is to fail to understand that World War III is already well under way.
“Distant history will view all of these wars as nuances, concluding that Wars I, II, and III were really one catastrophic conflict with time out for rearmament and recruitment,” suggests Bill Whittle in his recent review of wars past and present.
War is not the greatest evil to fear. It is the condition of tyranny that results when collectivism rules instead of individualism, which has been the default condition under which most of humanity has lived since the beginning of recorded history.
It is a sad reality of history that the number of people killed in wars fought against foreign enemies is utterly dwarfed when compared to the number of people killed, murdered, and enslaved by their own rulers and governments. In this context, wars are mere flash points of a given tyranny running into resistance, more often from another tyranny than from any popular or democratic resistance. Hence, perpetual wars.
In the Western nations, tyrannies have been hastened with the consent of the people, a consent that does not necessarily mean agreement or support – just cooperation and compliance.
Too many have failed to resist or to speak out against a growing tyranny when the opportunity still exists. In the classic “I see nothing – I hear nothing – I know nothing” expression of denial popularized in the 1960s television series Hogan’s Heroes, most “say nothing” – even in the face of outrageous injustices and horrors.
Despite this, governments are doing all they can to silence the few voices that dare to speak out in an effort to prevent those voices from being heard by others. The antidote to tyranny, and therefore to war, is to ensure that a critical mass of people “see something, hear something, and know something” that is Just Right – and then act accordingly.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
